Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

Trump Was Right – He’s Now Asking About ‘Natural Born Citizen’ – Larry Sinclair – The BOPAC Report

April 11, 2011

The BOPAC Report

Larry Sinclair’s Journey –

Remember the injustice Larry Sinclair suffered at the hands of the Obama Regime.

Hmmm. Interesting.  Raising my nose to the air, I think I get the faint scent of a lawsuit.

Dr’s & West Virginia University Hospital-East Administrators Apologies Not Enough

Written By: Administrator – Apr• 09•11

Today we received a copy of an “amendment” Dr. Liza Hiles (right) (WV has no Medical License on file for Dr. Hiles) wrote and had placed in Larry’s medical records after being contacted over her and two other Dr.’s multiple reports where they stated Larry was diagnosed HIV+.  According to Dr. Hiles amendment she did discuss it with Dr. Timothy DeVine (left). Dr. Hiles amendment is simply not enough nor is the letter (also received today) from Marilys Gilbert, WVUH-East Director of Quality and Risk Management where the hospital apologizes for the diagnosis but at them same time implies it is possible Larry is HIV+.

After publishing 

Dr’s Falsely Diagnosed Larry HIV+ Based On Claims of Sheriff Deputy???

Mrs. Gilbert and WVUH-East Jefferson Memorial Hospital Administrator Christina Coad both visited this site and archived the article. The below shows both Mrs. Gilbert and Mrs. Coad archiving the page…

 

Natural Born Citizen –

The Journolist Truth Assassins - careless with truth regarding little things, big things and all things in between. Do you doubt the "Journolists Truth Assassins" were involved in shaping the news regarding Obama's lack of eligibility?

Trump is Right and is Now Turning to the Real Issue – What is a ‘Natural Born Citizen?’

Trump has been right in bringing up Obama’s eligibility/natural born citizen issue, the ‘birther’ issue.  No one else (at this point in time) has the clout or the guts to tackle it. No other politician or ethical reporter will cover this issue in any depth because the Political Correctness (PC) police have been out in full force intimidating all who might dare to raise any questions. They’ve been very successful too. That’s why ‘birther’ is the name everyone associates with it; and why most associate the meaning the name implies – not born in Hawaii. No independent thought necessary! However, it is an issue that needs to be addressed, if for no other reason that we have military men and women fighting around the world at Obama’s beck and call

And the high stakes game, it appears will have a few more hands to play.

The issue with Obama’s eligibility (regardless of what the media is trying to lead you to believe) not only involves the place of his birth but also his conflicted allegiances vis-à-vis the citizenship of his father.

Unfortunately, there is no Supreme Court decision that I know of where the Court addresses the specific question (in a case where it is factually necessary to the facts and issue presented) of who can and can’t be a Natural Born Citizen, other than in the penumbra of discussions/historical presentations in cases involving ordinary and/or naturalized citizenship. 

However, the relevant writings/common understandings that were available to the Founders and the ones that have been suggested that the Founders relied, suggest (see article by Prof. Solum – ‘Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause’) that to be a natural born citizen requires being born in country to parents (2) who were citizens at the time of the person’s birth.

Further, the significance of the Constitutional provision containing both the terms ‘Citizen’ and ‘Natural Born Citizen’ clearly indicate there is a difference in meaning in the two.  This has been recognized in several cases and writings.  The reasons for inclusion of the Presidential eligibility restrictions are also recognized as being the need for and/or fear of a person becoming President who did not have complete/sole allegiance to the new nation. In your heart of hearts, do your perceptions of Obama’s actions and ideology validate the Founders’ concerns?  For me, the answer seems obvious.

Did you see that Trump had a meeting with a group that included a Rep. from Arizona and gave out some homework?  In that meeting, Mr. Trump asked for information regarding the term “natural born citizen”. Only the Donald can assign research as homework and not have to pay for it.  Once Donald Trump receives the information asked for, he will then be in a position to force the main street media’s hand; and call them on their decision to cut the public out of considering the Obama eligibility issue in any meaningful, thoughtful way.

Simply labeling everyone asking questions ‘birthers’ is neither meaningful nor thoughtful.

Keep in mind that, Trump also has his mother’s naturalized citizenship status as a possible springboard should he decide to file a suit for a Declaratory Judgment indicating he (Trump) is eligible. 

That’s an ace in the hole that only Trump has!

Get your Popcorn ready!  Trump has sent investigators to Hawaii and is collecting his assigned homework. There are more hands to play!

Commentary –

If Gen. George Patton were still around, I would bet that he would be standing shoulder to shoulder with Lt. Col. Lakin!

In support of Lt. Col. Lakin’s courage in seeking the ‘Truth’ (and as a former In-Flight Tech in the Navy), I urge all who have served or have friends/family in the military to ask the following question of those currently serving. 

Brothers and Sisters in the Military, when are you going to demand Obama establish that he is a Natural Born Citizen, eligible to serve as Commander In Chief?  

The military is the only government organization that I continue to have respect for and it pains me criticize those serving.  And I understand the consequences of challenging Obama’s eligibility directly, but the continuing attacks against our Constitution by the left cannot be allowed to pass without objection in some form or another.  Acquiescence is not the only option.

Consider this please.  What if every serviceman or woman went to his or her Chaplin, stated their concerns and provided the basic evidence (direct and circumstantial, links, former statements by NPR etc. indicating a Kenyan birth, etc., etc.) that would cause most reasonable persons to have legitimate questions about Obama’s lack of eligibility to serve and issue lawful orders?  What if requests were made to each Chaplin instructing them to pass these concerns up the Chain of Command?  Would there come a point, a number of requests that would cause the leadership to demand proof of eligibility?

Maybe military leadership could utilize the following provision?

§ 935. Art. 135. Courts of inquiry

(a) Courts of inquiry to investigate any matter may be convened by any person authorized to convene a general court-martial or by any other person designated by the Secretary concerned for that purpose, whether or not the persons involved have requested such an inquiry.

If the Oath to protect the Constitution is not important today, why don’t we just change the oath of allegiance to reflect our current level of commitment? 

I, _______, do solemnly swear to protect ME and I will try to defend the Constitution as long as it doesn’t adversely impact the aforementioned ‘ME’.

 

Selwyn Duke says Obama is a moral relativist – which when it comes to faith wouldn’t make a pimple on a real Christian’s, Jew’s, or Muslim’s butt. Moral relativism does explain Obama’s marriage, rumors of his Man’s Country membership, his fling with Larry Sinclair, his flawed birth narrative, and how the world revolves around Obama. Moral relativist it is - camouflaged by Taqiyya Two Step

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Albert Einstein

Other News:

Unfortunately, I don't have to make a big leap to believe something like this actually exists in the Obama White House basement! Especially after the discovery of the existance of the 'Journolist' Truth Assassins - Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, The Constitution, our freedoms, etc. all appear to be in the BOPAC Administration's and their friends' (State Run Media, Journolist, NAACP, Black Panthers, Ayers, Rev. Wright) sights.

American Thinker

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/donald_trump_scores_an_importa.html

CitizenWells

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/donald-trump-on-obama-natural-born-citizen-status-us-constitution-requirement-natural-born-citizen-not-citizen/

Dr. Kate’s Review

http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/yawn-alinsky-5-ridicule/

Lame Cherry

http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2011/04/obamas-islamic-coke.html

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Natural Born Citizen

Orly Taitz, Esq.

Philip Berg, Esq.

SafeguardOurConstituion – Lt. Col. Lakin’s Site

Talk Wisdom

http://talkwisdom.blogspot.com/2011/04/paul-ryan-gop-heroes-vs-obamafraud.html

The Post Email

The Steady Drip

United States Constitution

 Official DisclosureJust to be clear, my graphics depict almost all members of the BOPAC Administration as being full of crap.  They do not actually look like turds – one needs special ‘full of crap’ glasses to be able to see the core of those who continually feed America BS.  I treat everyone equally – when Glenn Beck goes off on those who reasonably question Obama’s eligibility, he gets a half-full of crap depiction.

Historical Definition of Natural Born Citizen in Congress – Leo Donofrio – T-Shirt Ideas for Obama’s Visits – Larry Sinclair New Book in time for 2012 Election – The BOPAC Report

March 10, 2011

The BOPAC Report

Natural Born Citizen –

Unfortunately, I don't have to make a big leap to believe something like this actually exists in the Obama White House basement! Especially after the discovery of the existance of the 'Journolist' Truth Assassins - Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, The Constitution, our freedoms, etc. all appear to be in the BOPAC Administration's and their friends' (State Run Media, Journolist, NAACP, Black Panthers, Ayers, Rev. Wright) sights.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/the-house-of-representatives-definition-of-natural-born-citizen-born-of-citizen-parents-in-the-us/

Leo Donofrio, Esq. continues to hit the books to provide America a more informed understanding of the term ‘natural born citizen’. Mr. Donofrio concludes at the end of his article:

“You have a voice.  You have freedom of speech.  You have access to your federal and state representatives.”

I realize those in the military don’t have the ability to be as vocal as the rest of us, but if the Constitution is to be changed by whoever happens to be in power willy-nilly (without proper consideration, debate, consensus), then America is on the fast track to diminished freedoms.

The House of Representatives Definition of “Natural Born Citizen” = Born of citizen “parents” in the US.

…During a debate (see pg. 2791) regarding a certain Dr. Houard, who had been incarcerated in Spain, the issue was raised on the floor of the House of Representatives as to whether the man was a US citizen. Representative Bingham (of Ohio), stated on the floor:

“As to the question of citizenship I am willing to resolve all doubts in favor of a citizen of the United States. That Dr. Houard is a natural-born citizen of the United States there is not room for the shadow of a doubt. He was born of naturalized parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, and by the express words of the Constitution, as amended to-day, he is declared to all the world to be a citizen of the United States by birth.” (The term “to-day”, as used by Bingham, means “to date”. Obviously, the Constitution had not been amended on April 25, 1872.)

Notice that Bingham declares Houard to be a “natural-born citizen” by citing two factors – born of citizen parents in the US.

John Bingham, aka “father of the 14th Amendment”, was an abolitionist congressman from Ohio who prosecuted Lincoln’s assassins. Ten years earlier, he stated on the House floor:

“All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.(Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 1639 (1862))

Then in 1866, Bingham also stated on the House floor:

Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.(Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))

No other Representative ever took issue with these words on the floor of the House. If you read the Congressional Globe to study these debates, you will see that many of the underlying issues were hotly contested. However, Bingham’s definition of “natural born citizen” (born of citizen parents in the US) was never challenged on the floor of the House.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court’s holding in Wong Kim Ark did not address Presidential eligibility, nor did it define “natural born citizen”…

…The definition of natural born citizen as stated on the House floor = born in the US to parents who are citizens. It’s not like those cats were incapable of correcting each other’s mistakes. Since no Supreme Court case ever stated a different definition of “natural born citizen”, and no Represenative ever challenged Bingham on this point, the House definition stands and officially remains unchallenged as of today. If the House wants to change this definition, let them bring the issue to the floor now and properly debate it.

Until then, call it the House of Representatives definition as offered by the father of the 14th Amendment who was never challenged upon it.

Don’t let history be rewritten by propagandists. The evidence is mounting on a daily basis that the current Commander In Chief is not eligible to hold the office of President. You have a voice. You have freedom of speech. You have access to your federal and state representatives…

I heard that recently the Obama regime has been worried schools are not applying for his presence at their graduation ceremonies in sufficient numbers.  I have a suggestion for those adventurous seniors who might want to give Obama a welcome he deserves. How about wearing a T-Shirt under your gown with a message.  If successfully accomplished, he or she may be able to spin this into T-Shirt business to make a little extra money this summer.

Here’s a few suggestions for the front or back of your shirt. I’m sure there are hundreds  you can create.

Mr. President do you remember Inspector General Walpin?

Remember the injustice Inspector General Walpin suffered at the hands of the Obama Regime.

Mr. President do you remember Larry Sinclair?

Remember the injustice Larry Sinclair suffered at the hands of the Obama Regime.

Mr. President do you remember Donald Young?

Remember the injustice Donald Young suffered.

Mr. Obama do you remember Lt. Col. Lakin?

Remember the injustice Lt. Col. Lakin suffered at the hands of the Obama Regime.

Larry Sinclair’s Journey –

Larry Sinclair has always been under threat from Obama's minions for daring to disclose allegations of sex, drugs, and other things involving Obama. Take Care Larry.

Good news coming from Larry Sinclair.  A little present from Larry in time for the 2012 Election?

Sinclair Starts Work on Second Book: “When One Man Stands”

Written By: Administrator – Mar• 08•11

Larry Sinclair has begun work on his second book tentatively titled “When One Man Stands,” as his follow-up to his first book Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder?

His second book will give an even more detailed and personal look into Larry’s life before meeting Barack Obama, including revelations into his childhood as well as more detailed look into what Larry has been subjected to after standing up to tell the truth about Barack Obama. The book will include more emails, photos.

The book “When One Man Stands” is planned for a mid summer 2012 release date.

Commentary –

Obama's failure to be transparent about his possible lack of eligibility is tarnishing the currently serving military personnel's service! Will there be an update to the DD-214?

In support of Lt. Col. Lakin’s courage in seeking the ‘Truth’ (and as a former In-Flight Tech in the Navy), I urge all who have served or have friends/family in the military to ask the following question of those currently serving. 

Brothers and Sisters in the Military, when are you going to demand Obama establish that he is a Natural Born Citizen, eligible to serve as Commander In Chief?  

The military is the only government organization that I continue to have respect for and it pains me criticize those serving.  And I understand the consequences of challenging Obama’s eligibility directly, but the continuing attacks against our Constitution by the left cannot be allowed to pass without objection in some form or another.  Acquiescence is not the only option.

Consider this please.  What if every serviceman or woman went to his or her Chaplin, stated their concerns and provided the basic evidence (direct and circumstantial, links, former statements by NPR etc. indicating a Kenyan birth, etc., etc.) that would cause most reasonable persons to have legitimate questions about Obama’s lack of eligibility to serve and issue lawful orders?  What if requests were made to each Chaplin instructing them to pass these concerns up the Chain of Command?  Would there come a point, a number of requests that would cause the leadership to demand proof of eligibility?

Maybe military leadership could utilize the following provision?

§ 935. Art. 135. Courts of inquiry

(a) Courts of inquiry to investigate any matter may be convened by any person authorized to convene a general court-martial or by any other person designated by the Secretary concerned for that purpose, whether or not the persons involved have requested such an inquiry.

If the Oath to protect the Constitution is not important today, why don’t we just change the oath of allegiance to reflect our current level of commitment? 

I, _______, do solemnly swear to protect ME and I will try to defend the Constitution as long as it doesn’t adversely impact the aforementioned ‘ME’.

The Journolist Truth Assassins - careless with truth regarding little things, big things and all things in between. Do you doubt the "Journolists Truth Assassins" were involved in shaping the news regarding Obama's lack of eligibility?

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Albert Einstein

 

Other News:

Selwyn Duke says Obama is a moral relativist – which when it comes to faith wouldn’t make a pimple on a real Christian’s, Jew’s, or Muslim’s butt. Moral relativism does explain Obama’s marriage, rumors of his Man’s Country membership, his fling with Larry Sinclair, his flawed birth narrative, and how the world revolves around Obama. Moral relativist it is - camouflaged by Taqiyya Two Step

CitizenWells

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/daniel-frawley-rezko-partner-cooperating-obama-connection-companion-security-contract-iraq-frawley-pleads-guilty/#comment-187592

See also: http://www.dakotavoice.com/2011/03/supreme-court-shirks-states-proceed-on-presidential-eligibility-issue/

United States Constitution

 Official DisclosureJust to be clear, my graphics depict almost all members of the BOPAC Administration as being full of crap.  They do not actually look like turds – one needs special ‘full of crap’ glasses to be able to see the core of those who continually feed America BS.  I treat everyone equally – when Glenn Beck goes off on those who reasonably question Obama’s eligibility, he gets a half-full of crap depiction.

Great News For Larry Sinclair – He’s Being Sued! – Maybe the Truth will be Established – Man’s Country – Lame Cherry – Lt. Col. Lakin – The BOPAC Report

June 4, 2010

 The BOPAC Report

The Secret Life of O –

Ahmadinejad - One of Many Reasons Why Larry Sinclair's Allegations Matter!

Connections are being made and what at first appeared as a simple matter of secret personal preferences might be growing into some sort of systemic cancerous reflection of many in American politics.  The cancer is secrecy about infidelity and identity.  I could care less what people’s sexual preferences are – but I do care about honesty, security clearances, transparency and the possibility of blackmail regarding members of our government.

From Lame Cherry:

Obama’s Man’s Country
There has been a story circulating around the internet by Wayne Madsen which if true confirms a great deal of the profiling conducted here in the Barack Hussein Obama Chicago sodomite group he was involved in, as it is stated that B. Hussein Obama and Rahm Emanuel both belong to a gay sex shop called Man’s Country.

The fascination I have with this story is not that it confirms research, profiling or provides even more exoneration to Lawrence Sinclair, but that it fills a crucial void in this story of Obama the gayster, as he bounced around the globe from Indonesian adoptee to Pakistani partridge hunter.

No one has asked the question in this yet, if the reason Obama was introduced to the secret handshake crowd which lifted him from gay Columbia University to the Gay Clubs of Chicago, was not about Marxism, black liberation, Muslim mafia money, but instead was about the connected gay community opening doors for one of their own…Continue Reading

Larry Sinclair’s Journey –

Larry Sinclair's story will be told and I'm confident he will be vindicated - The pieces of the story continue to unfold.

Well, finally some good news for Larry Sinclair. He’s being sued!  This is good news because the ultimate defense for defamation is the alleged conduct, etc. is ‘true’.  It’s good news because it is another opportunity for the state run media to cover a story they have been trying so hard to hide.  It’s good news because Larry Sinclair will have another opportunity to review the results of the ‘polygraph’ exam results.  For those who have been following Larry Sinclair’s story, most are aware that the results were not definitive.  It seems that Larry Sinclair passed a computer analysis of the results.  All good news!  I wonder if Larry can subpoena the records of ‘Man’s Country’ to verify recent news stories about Obama and Emanual’s memberships there. That would be great!  Maybe a reward for former lovers to come forward.  I said COME not &*)(!  How about the subpoena for Axelrod. 

I think Larry Sinclair will welcome his day in court.  It’s always been about the TRUTH for most of us following Larry Sinclair’s story.  We have watched how Mr. Sinclair has been vilified and threatened.  It is TIME FOR THE TRUTH!

What do you want to bet that somehow this lawsuit goes away? Some may not want people to have the opportunity to judge for themselves who’s more credible – Larry Sinclair or Obama.

 From Courthouse News:

Obama Accuser Accused

By RYAN ABBOTT 

WASHINGTON (CN) – A political blogger claims a gadfly defamed him with “wild allegations” about colluding with then-Senator Barack Obama’s campaign to hide the murder of a church choir director, cocaine use and gay sex. Daniel Parisi sued Larry Sinclair in Federal Court, and also sued a radio talk show host, Sinclair Publishing, Barnes & Noble, Amazon.com, and Books-a-Million.
     Parisi claims Sinclair published a book in 2009 that accuses him of colluding with Obama’s adviser David Axelrod to rig a polygraph exam that would debunk Sinclair’s story that he had sex and took cocaine with then-Senator Obama.
     Parisi claims that in 2008 Sinclair posted “wild allegations regarding the purchase, sale and use of drugs and sexual activity by and between Sinclair and Obama,” on YouTube. That video was still posted on YouTube this morning (Thursday)….Continue Reading

Lt. Col. Lakin’s Journey –

I'm Sure There Are Many Soldiers Living This Nightmare. It's Time For The Joint Chiefs of Staff to Step To The Plate and Support Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin! Don't Be Military Sheep.

Unfortunately but not unexpectedly, Lt. Col. Lakin’s journey is going to be a difficult one.  The Investigating Officer has said he will not consider evidence of Obama’s ineligibility. This means that Lt. Col. Lakin will not be able to obtain a fair trial if such evidence is not allowed to be presented at his Courts Martial. Certainly an issue for appeal, but given that those with power have added a few extra wardrobe accessories to go with Lady Justice’s blindfold – ear plugs, a sock in her mouth, shackles on her feet, and handcuffs – it will be steep climb.  Those in the DC area should note that the Art. 32 hearing is open to public – bring video cameras.

 

And Obama continues to hide documentation that every other President has allowed to be made public.  This courageous Officer is risking his career and liberty to live up to the Oath he took and Obama sits on his hands

 

From World Net Daily:

 

Army slams door on Obama details

Lt. Col. Lakin hearing: ‘Items pertaining to president’s credentials are not relevant’

Posted: June 03, 2010
4:06 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

An Army “investigating officer” has banished evidence about the controversy over President Obama’s eligibility – or lack thereof – to be commander-in-chief from a pending hearing for a career military doctor who announced he is refusing orders until Obama documents his constitutional status.

“In my view our constitutional jurisprudence allows Congress alone, and not a military judicial body, to put the president’s credentials on trial,” wrote Daniel J. Driscoll in a memorandum determining what evidence the defense for Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin will be allowed to explore at next week’s hearing.

“It is my opinion the discovery items pertaining to the president’s credentials are not relevant to the proof of any element of the charges and specifications set forth in the charge sheet,” he continued. “Consequently I will not examine the documents or witnesses pertinent to the president or his credentials to hold office.”

The ruling came prior to a scheduled Article 32 hearing for Lakin, who posted a video inviting his own court hearing because of the status of the president and questions over whether his eligibility means orders given under his control would be invalid. …Continue Reading

CitizenWells gives another example of how the American Justice system is decaying.  It seems that most people still have a shot at equal justice as long as their cases don’t involve controversial ‘political’ issues that challenge power.  First we learned that what was thought as a fair media was exposed to be nothing more than a tool for those seeking to undermine the Constitution and now we discover that our justice system is in the process of changing the very definition of ‘justice’ to one written in Chicago.  Time will tell just how corrupt our courts have become.

Hollister v Soetoro aka Barack Obama, Update, June 3, 2010, Motion for recusal of Judge Robertson, Attorney John D. Hemenway motion

June 3, 2010

Hollister v Soetoro aka Barack Obama, Update, June 3, 2010, Motion for recusal

From Attorney John D. Hemenway.

“On behalf of Colonel Gregory Hollister, et al, Attorney John D. Hemenway filed a “Motion for Recusal” in the Colonel Gregory Hollister, et al, v. Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama, et al, lawsuit now pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The Judge in question is Judge Robertson who ruled the issue of “the President’s citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and was otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry…,” among numerous other bias statements. Atty Hemenway cites numerous cases including a SCOTUS case regarding bias and the recusal of Judges. The Motion for Recusal embedded below the snippet speaks for itself and is well worth the time to read.

This is the same Judge that ruled that Jihadists at Gitmo are entitled to the same benefits as our Troops….Continue Reading

 Brothers and Sisters in the Military – When are you going to demand Obama establish that he is a Natural Born Citizen, eligible to serve as Commander In Chief?  Don’t be OBamboozled!

If your Oath to protect the Constitution is not important today, why don’t we just change the military oath of allegiance to reflect our current level of commitment? 

I, _______, do solemnly swear to protect ME and I will try to defend the Constitution as long as it doesn’t adversely impact the aforementioned ‘ME’.

 

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Albert Einstein

 

Other  News –

Prime Minister Netanyahu, you have millions of American's behind you. Ignore Obama's theatrics and protect Israel!

From CitizenWells:

Blagojevich trial day 2, June 4, 2010, Jury selection, Judge James Zagel, Prosecutors and defense attorneys question jurors, Open thread

June 4, 2010

The Universal United Church of OBamboozle! State Run Media Always Welcome! Every Secret Well Kept! Kal Penn, Larry Sinclair, not a Natural Born Citizen, Bill Ayers, Reggie, etc., etc., etc.

Google Suppresses Obama Social Security Number Story? – Rev. Manning Obama Trial Starts – Lt. Col. Lakin Gets Court Date – American Patriot Foundation – The BOPAC Report

May 13, 2010

The BOPAC Report

ChiBama Politics –

The Universal United Church of OBamboozle!

It seems when the truth gets to close to Obama, Google salutes and censures news.

From WND:

Google hides Obama’s Social Security Number story

Searches for WND report diverted to Kagan, oil, Tampa stories

Posted: May 12, 2010
8:50 pm Eastern

© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Internet giant Google today was hushing up the new dispute over President Obama’s strange Social Security number by diverting searches for news reports on the issue to unrelated stories about Elena Kagan, oil, Tampa and the Federal Reserve.

The actual story, posted on WND.com, explained how two private investigators – working independently – are asking why Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state. …Continue Reading

 

Natural Born Citizen –

Coddling Terrorists, Persecuting Navy Seals and CIA, Persecuting Israel, Socialist Takeover of Industry, Political Correctness Allowing Ft. Hood Massacre – Will this be the next thing we see from Obama and Eric Holder?

For those of you who are not familiar with Rev. Manning, you should what a few of his youtube videos. He is a committed pastor who, like millions of Americans is simply seeking the truth.  Google seems to be following their pattern regarding Reverend Manning also.

Obama eligibility ‘trial’ set to launch

Academics, citizenship to be investigated

Posted: May 12, 2010

By Stewart Stogel
 

NEW YORK – Though he’s been in office some 16 months, one-third of his elected term, a multitude of questions still linger as to whether Barack Obama is legally eligible to serve as president of the United States.

And one organization, in Harlem, has decided to move the issue front and center by sponsoring what it calls “a real trial” which it contends will “shed light” on the questions surrounding the 44the president.

Starting Friday and for a full week, the Atlah World Missionary Church will hold in essence a citizen’s court in what it bills as “the greatest trial in American history.”

The “trial” which will include legal scholars and retired court officers will “examine” several issues, among them:

  1. Obama’s birth place
  2. His citizenship status
  3. His academic credentials
  4. His ties to the Central Intelligence Agency

The Atlah World Missionary Church, headed by Rev. James Manning, says the proceedings are not a mock trial and are permitted under the U.S. Constitution:

“A number of Americans have been gravely concerned about the eligibility issue of Barack Obama… We have been able to look at the briefs filed by several attorneys and the courts have just refused categorically to allow any access or due process on the matter… We are going to call a 10th Amendment sanctioned trial. It is not a grand jury, it’s not a hearing, it’s a trial and we are going to follow all the rules and practices of both federal and state jurisprudence… We are going to adjudicate this trial in such a way that it will be historically respectful and appellate proof.”

Continue Reading

 

Lt. Col. Lakin’s Journey –

If Obama is Not Eligible to Serve, He Cannot Issue "Lawful Orders" Obama may be a Natural Born Turd But He's Not a "Natural Born Citizen".

Lt. Col. Lakin’s appointed defense counsel is MAJ Matthew J. Kemkes.  This Navy Veteran supports your efforts to uncover the truth about Obama’s eligibility, or lack thereof, to serve as Commander In Chief.  Everyone should be reminded that Obama could easily release the documents that could prove is eligibility at any time.  How many careers will Obama sacrifice to keep his secrets? Every other person to sit in the Oval Office has released similar documents in the course of running for such an important office. What does common sense tell you?  Hiding something big?

Press Release: Army Schedules Formal Hearing 

American Patriot Foundation, Inc.
1101 Thirtieth Street, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20007
http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com

PRESS RELEASE

ARMY SCHEDULES FORMAL HEARING IN CRIMINAL CASE AGAINST DECORATED ARMY PHYSICIAN BEING COURT-MARTIALLED FOR REFUSING TO OBEY ALL ORDERS

AT REQUEST OF DEFENSE COUNSEL, HEARING NOW TO PROCEED ON JUNE 11, 2010

Washington, D.C., May 12, 2010. The Army has now officially scheduled a formal hearing its case against Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who is being court-martialled by the Army for refusing to obey orders to deploy to Afghanistan because the President refuses –even in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary– to prove his eligibility under the Constitution to hold office. It will proceed on June 11, 2010 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C. at 9:00 a.m. in room 134 of Building T-2.

All proceedings are open to the media and public….Continue Reading

 

I'm Sure There Are Many Soldiers Living This Nightmare. It's Time For The Joint Chiefs of Staff to Step To The Plate and Support Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin! Don't Be Military Sheep.

Brothers and Sisters in the Military – When are you going to demand Obama establish that he is a Natural Born Citizen, eligible to serve as Commander In Chief?  

If your Oath to protect the Constitution is not important today, why don’t we just change the military oath of allegiance to reflect our current level of commitment? 

I, _______, do solemnly swear to protect ME and I will try to defend the Constitution as long as it doesn’t adversely impact the aforementioned ‘ME’.

 

Obama Dreams About Government Run Health Care, Larry Sinclair, Birth Certificates, Natural Born Citizens While America Lives in a Nightmare.

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Albert Einstein

 

Other  News –

 

From World Net Daily:

Dalai Lama has advice for Obama! America Must Demand Proof or Face the Consequences!

Hearing set for officer challenging eligibility

Army doctor’s investigation scheduled for June 11

From CitizenWells:

When I served in the Navy, I understood that I was risking my life for Freedom, Liberty and the Constitution. I would not have joined if I were defending socialism. Have our most revered sacrificed all in vain? Not yet but we are getting close.

These are the times that try men’s soul, Battle of Bunker Hill, 1775 ,Why should vain mortals tremble at the sight of Death and destruction in the field of battle, The American Hero, Andrew Law, Nathaniel Niles

 

Democratics Better ‘THINK’ – Aretha Franklin Lyrics – Generic Congressional Ballot – Reading Tea Party Leaves – Jonah Goldberg – ObamaCare – ObamaNomics – 3000% Discount to Employers – Second Amendment – ‘NBC’ Ad – Kerchner/Apuzzo – The BOPAC Report

March 17, 2010

 The BOPAC Report 

2010 Election –

As Aretha Franklin says: You better think (think) think about what you're trying to do to me - Yeah, think (think,think), let your mind go, let yourself be free!

As the old Aretha Franklin song ‘Think’ lyrics go: 

You better think (think) think about what you’re trying to do to me
Yeah, think (think, think), let your mind go, let yourself be free 

Democrats had better THINK! 

Generic Congressional Ballot 

Republicans Lead Democrats by 10 in Generic Ballot, Highest Lead Yet 

Tuesday, March 16, 2010 

Republican candidates have now stretched their lead over Democrats to 10 points in the Generic Congressional Ballot, their biggest lead ever in nearly three years of weekly tracking. The GOP has been leading on the ballot for months. 

The new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 45% would vote for their district’s Republican congressional candidate while 35% would opt for his or her Democratic opponent. Voter support for GOP congressional candidates increased slightly from last week, while support for Democrats fell two points. …Continue Reading 

Tea Party –

Tea Party - Supporting Those of Any Party Who Support The Constitution, Limited Government, Responsible Fiscal Policy, Lower Taxes, and Free Markets. Add Sen. Ben Nelson to the list of those to flush out of the Senate.

Reading tea party leaves 

Members have been portrayed as anti-intellectual and anti-elitist, but their goal is a system that reflects the Constitution and the precepts of limited government. 

By Jonah Goldberg 

March 16, 2010 

If you read the Op-Ed pages these days, you’d be forgiven for thinking that the GOP and the conservative movement have been taken over by know-nothing mobs, anti-intellectual demagogues and pitchfork-wielding bigots. There’s no omnibus label for this argument, but it’s a giveaway that a person subscribes to it if he or she describes the “tea party” movement as “tea baggers,” an awfully telling bit of condescension from the camp that affects the pose of being more high-minded. 

The case against the tea party movement is constantly evolving. Initially, they were written off as “astroturfers,” faux populists paid by K Street lobbyists to provide damaging footage for Fox News’ Obama coverage. Then, they were deemed racists who couldn’t handle having a black president. 

But now that the movement or, more broadly, the Obama backlash is so widespread…Continue Reading 

Natural Born Citizen –

Just like Obama is not Malcolm X - Obama is not a "Natural Born Citizen"! Obama may look like Malcolm X and Obama may be a "Citizen"; but being a "Citizen" does not necessarily mean that Obama is a "Natural Born Citizen"! Joint Chiefs of Staff’s new mottos: Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil & Don’t rock the boat!

The struggle for truth continues: 

Monday, March 15, 2010 

New Ad – Obama Flaunts the Constitution – 15 Mar 2010 Issue of Wash Times Natl Wkly – pg 5 

 

New Ad – Obama Flaunts the Constitution – 15 Mar 2010 Issue of Wash Times Natl Wkly – pg 5 

Commander Kerchner makes a statement in this new ad concerning what he believes was an absolutely incredulously lame legal brief filed by the DOJ lawyers for the putative president Obama on March 8th because it shows the total disregard for the Constitution of the United States held by the Administration and his subverted Department of Justice. The DOJ should be standing up to support and defend the U.S. Constitution and honor the oath they took to do so, instead of defending the constitutionally ineligible usurper putative president in the Oval Office, Mr. Obama, and helping him hide his true legal identity and all his early life records. Obama was born a British Subject. How can a person born British be eligible to be President and commander of our military? He cannot. A person born a British Subject, and a dual-Citizen at best, is NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the USA which is the Article II eligibility requirement in the U.S. Constitution for the person who would be President.  See the new ad for more information. 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28403528/Obama-Flaunts-the-Constitution-20100315-Issue-Wash-Times-Pg-5 

Charles Kerchner, Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com 

ObamaCare –

Well Maybe Obama's Obamacare will save money? But it will suck to be old!

ObamaCare is not about reforming healthcare.  It’s about taking control of a fifth of the US economy.  It’s a stepping stone to greater and greater control over all our lives.  I don’t know about you but I like have control of my own life. Thank you very much. 

Key Dem: Using ‘deem and pass’ health plan is ‘wrong’By Jordan Fabian – 03/16/10 11:53 AM ET 

A plan that would allow House Democrats to bypass a direct vote on the Senate’s healthcare bill is causing “discomfort,” a key centrist Democrat said Tuesday. 

Rep. Jason Altmire (D-Pa.), a member of the Blue Dog and New Democrat Coalitions, said that the plan to pass the plan using the so-called “deem and pass” procedure is “wrong” and unpopular among his constituents. …Continue Reading 

…“If President Obama and the Democrats repeat the mistakes of the health insurance mandate on a national level, they will bankrupt this country within four years,” Cahill said. … 

Cahill is the Massachusetts Treasurer. 

From the Boston Herald: 

Cahill rips governor on health care plans 

By Jessica Van Sack
Tuesday, March 16, 2010 – Updated 11h ago 

Treasurer Tim Cahill ripped Gov. Deval Patrick and President Obama this morning for health care initiatives that the independent gubernatorial hopeful alleged will “bankrupt the country in four years.” 

“Last week Gov. Patrick criticized me as ‘missing in action’ on the issue of health care in Massachusetts,” Cahill said. “In reality, I’ve been critical of Gov. Patrick’s implementation and management of the Massachusetts universal health care program for a long time.” 

Cahill alleged the governor has “spent like we’re in a booming economy at a time when we’re experiencing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.” 

“If President Obama and the Democrats repeat the mistakes of the health insurance mandate on a national level, they will bankrupt this country within four years,” Cahill said. “It is time for the President and the Democratic leadership to go back to the drawing board and come up with a new plan that does not threaten to wipe out the American economy.” 

Cahill’s call for a new plan resembled the statement made during US Sen. Scott Brown’s insurgent campaign…. Continue Reading 

For our children and grand children’s sake, we must keep up the pressure to kill this bill. 

CNN: ObamaCare opponents 11 votes away from killing the bill 

March 16, 2010 by Allahpundit
  

I maintain that whip counts are worthless, but (a) the GOP has the same count and (b) since we’re probably headed for a bitter defeat this weekend, we should enjoy our illusions of hope while we can. 

Feel the nomentum. Can you feel it? 

Five more House Democrats said Tuesday that they will vote against Senate health care legislation, which puts opponents of reform just 11 votes shy of the 216 needed to prevent President Obama from scoring a major victory on his top domestic priority… 

A total of 27 House Democrats, including nine who supported the House plan in November, have indicated that they would join a unified Republican caucus in opposing the Senate plan, which passed in that chamber December 24 with the minimum required 60 votes… 

Of the 39 Democrats who voted against the House plan in November, 17 have indicated that they will vote against the Senate plan as written, 11 remain uncommitted, and nine did not return repeated calls for comment

One member, Parker Griffith of Alabama, became a Republican in December. An additional member, Rep. Eric Massa of New York, resigned his seat last week. 

If the reports tonight are true, Kucinich will be a no-to-yes flip tomorrow. Even so, all we need are 11 of the 19 undecided Dems who hated this thing enough to vote no on the House bill way back in November? Granted, the Senate bill is kinda sorta more fiscally conservative than Pelosi’s bill was (no public option, for starters), but the political climate is more toxic now too. Eleven seems … possible, especially with the phones melting down. …Continue Reading 

Anti-ObamaNomics –

Obamanomics - It's a Crap Shoot!

 Where are the Blue Dog Democrats? 

Gov. Christie budget plan unveils big cuts and layoffs 

By MICHAEL SYMONS • GANNETT STATE BUREAU • March 16, 2010 

TRENTON — Gov. Chris Christie unveiled a $28.3 billion state budget plan Tuesday that includes deep cuts in spending on property tax rebates and aid to municipalities, schools and colleges, as well as the layoffs of thousands of state workers. 

“This plan requires sacrifice by all New Jerseyans. But it is a shared sacrifice. And while holding the line is difficult today, it is necessary for a better tomorrow,” Christie said. 

“The watchwords of this budget are shared sacrifice and fairness. Individuals contribute, businesses sacrifice, local governments tighten their belts, and we end our
addiction to spending,” Christie said. “Everyone comes to the center of the room — we
jump off the cliff together to stave off certain fiscal death for the hope of economic salvation tomorrow.”…Continue Reading 

ObamaNomics  –

(It’s not fuzzy math, it’s idiotic math.) 

Obama Dreams About Government Run Health Care, Larry Sinclair, Birth Certificates, Natural Born Citizens While America Lives in a Nightmare.

What an idiot!  100% reduction would mean employer pays nothing. 

http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/2010/03/president-obama-says-obamacare-will.html 

Rush Limbaugh gives more details: 

…BEGIN TRANSCRIPT 

RUSH: Audio sound bites.  This is Obama yesterday in Strongsville, Ohio.  This whole appearance yesterday was filled with lies, falsehoods, untruths, even another sob story about some person unable to get health care. “Yeah, she can’t be here today because she’s so sick.” The reason why she wasn’t there is she’s in the hospital, being treated at no charge!  Anyway, this is just one thing Obama said. 

OBAMA:  How many people are getting’ insurance through their jobs right now? Raise your hands?  A’right. Well, a lot of those folks, your employer, it’s estimated, would see premiums fall by as much as 3,000%, which means they could give you a RAISE! 

FOLLOWERS: (cheering) 

RUSH:  Three thousand percent premiums are going to fall! Three thousand percent!  Now, there were only 200 people that showed up yesterday.  I don’t know if that’s all that were interested or that’s just the number they could find that were not opposed to health care.  But let’s just look at some numbers here. Let’s apply some numbers here to this 3,000% reduction in premiums.  I’m just going to pick a random number here to use. Let’s say the employer pays $4,000 in health care premiums for an employee.  If his premium went down 100%, he would save $4,000, all right?  If the premium went down 3,000%, that’s a savings of $4,000 (100%) times 30.  That equals $120,000, which means that if Obama’s number is accurate here, that health care will allow employers to give people a raise because their premiums will go down 3,000%. That means the employer will make a $120,000 profit on each employee’s health care insurance once Obamacare is passed.  Now, you can buy a lot of unicorns for $120,000, and you can buy a lot of idiots for $120,000, but that’s what he said. (doing impression) “Employer, eh, 3,000%! He could give you a raise.”  Well, they’re not going to get any raise.  This is bogus, 3,000%?  The health care companies are going to be giving employers 120 grand per employee?…Continue Reading 

Second Amendment –

Pretty soon only the tyrannical members of our government and criminals will be the ones with guns! Protect the Second Amendment to the Constitution with everything you have!

The Eggman is exactly right in his analysis over at ammoland. 

No More Gun Rights and No More Gun Control 

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010 at 8:20 pm
Tags: Gun ControlGun Owner ControlGun Owner RightsGun RightsNAGRNRASCOUTS 

No More Gun Rights and No More Gun Control
By TheEggman 

Letters to the AmmoLand Editor: Got something on your mind? Let us know and you can see it here. 

Virginia –-(AmmoLand.com)- I am constantly reading on the Net and in the media about so-called “gun rights” and “gun control.” 

Some examples; 

“The final briefs seeking to shape the Supreme Court’s coming decision on the reach of the Second Amendment’s protection of gun rights suggested Friday that states might be free to violate other parts of the Bill of Rights…” 

“The National Association for Gun Rights, often referred to as “NAGR”, was founded to assist the growing movement of pro-Second Amendment organizations, especially state-level gun rights groups. 

“The National Rifle Association is the largest gun rights lobbying organization in the United States.” 

On one hand, we preach that guns are mere machines, inanimate objects and tools. On the other, we appear to be attempting to give ‘rights’ to these inanimate machines. 

I submit to you a request; that we remove the phrase “gun rights” from our vocabulary and replace it with the more human, and more accurate, “gun-owner rights.” 

The First Amendment does not guarantee rights to printing presses as machines; it guarantees the rights of people to use printing presses, radios, televisions and the Internet without restriction. 

The Second Amendment guarantees no rights to guns themselves, as they are mere machines. However, it does guarantee the right of the people to keep and bear them…Continue Reading 

Other Team FOCOA News – 

(Full of Crap Obama Administration)

When I served in the Navy, I understood that I was risking my life for Freedom, Liberty and the Constitution. I would not have joined if I were defending socialism. Have our most revered sacrificed all in vain? Not yet but we are getting close.

http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/2010/03/cnbcs-jim-cramer-says-obama-care-will.html 

Tuesday, March 16, 2010 

CNBC’s Jim Cramer Says ObamaCare will “Break the Federal Budget”; Lead to “50%-60% Tax Rates” – Video 3/16/10 

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/klein-hamas-advises-obama-get-your-act-together-he-is-unable-to-do-anything-before-he-restores-the-trust-of-his-own-people/

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/03/16/doing-the-health-care-anecdote-vetting-the-left-wont-do/

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/milton-r-wolf-md-obama-health-care-bill-primum-nil-nocere-first-do-no-harm-obama-cousin-sean-hannity-show-march-16-2010/

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/auto_industry/march_2010/44_less_likely_to_buy_a_toyota_but_it_s_still_more_popular_than_chrysler

 

…Forty-three percent (43%) have a favorable view of Chrysler, with just nine percent (9%) very favorable. Forty-seven percent (47%) view the bailed-out automaker unfavorably, including 16% with a very unfavorable opinion. 

Ford is the most popular of the five automakers included in the new survey. Seventy-three percent (73%) view Ford favorably and just 18% unfavorably. This includes 34% with a very favorable opinion and five percent (5%) who see the company very unfavorably.  

Sixty-six percent (66%) have a favorable opinion of Honda, including 25% who view the carmaker very favorably. Honda is viewed unfavorably by 26%, with just eight percent (8%) very unfavorable. 

The other bailed-out Big Three automaker, General Motors, is regarded favorably by 57% and unfavorably by 37%. These findings included 20% with a very favorable opinion and 11% who view GM very unfavorably. …

Boycott General Motors and Chrysler!

 

Protest ObamaCare – Stand Up Once More for America’s Future – Michelle Malkin – CitizenWells – The BOPAC Report

March 8, 2010

 The BOPAC Report

ObamaCare –

 

Well Maybe Obama's Obamacare will save money? But it will suck to be old!

Michelle Malkin is calling on all tea party people to stand up once again.  The plans are in place to pass ObamaCare before the Easter recess of Congress.  Please warm up those phone and email fingers, make your signs, buy some comfortable shoes!

Make your voice heard: Counter-protest the Obamacare Road Show

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 8, 2010 02:48 AM

This is it, Tea Party people. This is the week for your on-the-ground mobilization to help drive a final nail into the Obamacare coffin. The perpetual campaigner-in-chief will be in Philadelphia today and St. Louis on Wednesday to rally his troops/stage props on a taxpayer-funded road show.

He said “make your voice heard” last week.

Make sure he and the MSM hear yours.

As usual, only a select few will get inside the events. So raise your voices outside.

It’s short notice to organize, but here are details on the Philly visit this morning:

President Barack Obama will take his health insurance road show to the Delaware Valley Monday when he speaks at Arcadia University in Glenside, Pa. The event is free and open to the public but you must have a ticket to get in the door.

The tickets were all distributed on Saturday.

He’s scheduled to speak at 11:00am Eastern.

Arcadia University is located at 450 S. Easton Road, Glenside, PA 19038.

Here’s the website for the Philadelphia Tea Party Patriots.

Details on the St. Louis speech and fundraiser on Wednesday:

The White House announced Saturday that President Barack Obama has chosen St. Charles High School as the backdrop for his speech next Wednesday on health care. The afternoon address will be by invitation only, and not open to the general public, his staff said in a release…

…After the St. Charles speech, the president is to head to downtown St. Louis for a campaign fund-raising event Wednesday night to raise money for U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

While in Hannibal for Democrat Days, McCaskill told reporters that she expects — and will urge — that much of the DSCC money raised Wednesday be used to help Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, the best-known Democrat running for the U.S. Senate.

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon said Saturday that he expects to join Obama at some point during Wednesday’s visit.

St. Charles High School is located at 725 North Kingshighway Street, St Charles, MO 63301-1797.

The McCaskill/Obama fundraiser will be held at the Renaissance Grand Hotel. More info:

Continue Reading

Obama Dreams About Government Run Health Care, Larry Sinclair, Birth Certificates, Natural Born Citizens While America Lives in a Nightmare.

And from CitizenWells a post with the phone numbers you need:

Obama Buys Vote With Public Option Promise, Raul Grijalva, Cochair of Progressive (Socialist) Caucus , Health Care Bill, Obama buying votes

March 8, 2010 ·

Obama Buys Vote With Public Option Promise, Raul Grijalva

From AMERIPAC.

 

 

Obama Buys Vote With Public Option Promise
To Co-chair of the Progressive (Socialist) Caucus

ALERT: Obama’s gorilla legislative tactics are buying votes in Congress. In a statement just released by the press office of Arizona Democrat Raul Grijalva, co-chair of the Progressive (Socialist) Caucus and the son of a migrate from Mexico is “glad” to further his cause of socialism in exchange for a vote for ObamaCare. Obama, betraying America is not leading and has become a Progressive Dictator ruling from the extreme liberal left with his own agenda.

TELL ALL 261 Democrat/Independent Representatives, Blue Dog Democrats AND President Obama To KILL THIS BILL and CUT HealthCare COSTS FIRST.

We must make every effort to fax, call and even personally visit every key congressman in their offices in Washington DC.
Select Here SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

Initially against ObamaCare Grijalva got the payoff he was looking for while talking to Obama and will change his vote on ObamaCare passage. Grivalja’s press statement said “I was glad to hear…” Obama is “…personally committed to pursue a public option after passage of the current bill.” Grivalja’s statement continued saying Obama told him “the public option lacks enough Senate support to be included in the final package.”

There is no way to stop ObamaCare in the Senate since Obama has ordered Reid to use reconciliation, FORCING THE BILL TO PASS WITH 51 VOTES. But we can beat it in the House! Dozens of Congressmen who voted for the bill last time are re-thinking their support as tax increases and special deals to buy off Senators are included. And, since the bill passed by only 220-215, Pelosi has no Democratic margin for error.

This is the biggest gamble of Obama’s presidency. Nancy Pelosi may not have the votes to pass the healthcare bill through the House. So, Obama is telling the Blue Dogs that he is prepared to sacrifice them in order to get ObamaCare. Will they cave in and throw away their chances in November, or will they finally live up to their “conservative” label?

America Cannot Afford To Wait Until November

Americans have already rejected ObamaCare. A Quinnipiac poll showed Americans disapproved of Obama’s healthcare plan by 54-35 percent. Rasmussen said 56% opposed and 41% approved, and both Pew Research and PPP said 50% were opposed to it. WE MUST KILL THIS BILL AND CUT HealthCare COSTS NOW!

We must make every effort to fax, call and even personally visit every key congressman in their offices in Washington DC.
Select Here SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

This is outrageous and exactly what Americans do not want. FAX NOW AND OFTEN AND MAKE CALLS TO CONGRESS. We need your continued help more than ever as Socialized Health Care MUST STILL Be Stopped.

TELL KEY CONGRESSMEN LISTED BELOW TO VOTE NO: Fax, Call and Even Personally Visit Each in their Offices in Washington DC:

PLEASE CALL! DC OFFICE LOCAL OFFICE State District
Harry Mitchell                 (202) 225-2190  (202) 225-2190    (202) 225-2190  (202) 225-2190             (202) 225-2190  (202) 225-2190    (202) 225-2190  (202) 225-2190                 (480) 946-2411  (480) 946-2411    (480) 946-2411  (480) 946-2411             (480) 946-2411  (480) 946-2411    (480) 946-2411  (480) 946-2411 AZ 5th District
Gabrielle Giffords                 (202) 225-2542  (202) 225-2542    (202) 225-2542  (202) 225-2542             (202) 225-2542  (202) 225-2542    (202) 225-2542  (202) 225-2542                 (520) 881-3588  (520) 881-3588    (520) 881-3588  (520) 881-3588             (520) 881-3588  (520) 881-3588    (520) 881-3588  (520) 881-3588 AZ 8th District
Ann Kirkpatrick                 (202) 225-2315  (202) 225-2315    (202) 225-2315  (202) 225-2315             (202) 225-2315  (202) 225-2315    (202) 225-2315  (202) 225-2315                 (928) 226-6914  (928) 226-6914    (928) 226-6914  (928) 226-6914             (928) 226-6914  (928) 226-6914    (928) 226-6914  (928) 226-6914 AZ 1st District
Jerry McNerney                 (202) 225-1947  (202) 225-1947    (202) 225-1947  (202) 225-1947             (202) 225-1947  (202) 225-1947    (202) 225-1947  (202) 225-1947                 925-833-0643  925-833-0643    925-833-0643  925-833-0643             925-833-0643  925-833-0643    925-833-0643  925-833-0643 CA 11th District
John Salazar                 202-225-4761  202-225-4761    202-225-4761  202-225-4761             202-225-4761  202-225-4761    202-225-4761  202-225-4761                 970-245-7107  970-245-7107    970-245-7107  970-245-7107             970-245-7107  970-245-7107    970-245-7107  970-245-7107 CO 3rd District
Jim Himes                 (202) 225-5541  (202) 225-5541    (202) 225-5541  (202) 225-5541            (202) 225-5541  (202) 225-5541                (866) 453-0028  (866) 453-0028           (866) 453-0028  (866) 453-0028 CT 4th District
Alan Grayson                (202) 225-2176  (202) 225-2176           (202) 225-2176  (202) 225-2176                (407) 841-1757  (407) 841-1757           (407) 841-1757  (407) 841-1757 FL 8th District
Bill Foster                (202) 225-2976  (202) 225-2976           (202) 225-2976  (202) 225-2976                630-406-1114  630-406-1114           630-406-1114  630-406-1114 IL 14th District
Baron Hill                202 225 5315  202 225 5315           202 225 5315  202 225 5315                812 288 3999  812 288 3999           812 288 3999  812 288 3999 IN 9th District
Mark Schauer                (202) 225-6276  (202) 225-6276           (202) 225-6276  (202) 225-6276                (517) 780-9075  (517) 780-9075           (517) 780-9075  (517) 780-9075 MI 7th District
Gary Peters                (202) 225-5802  (202) 225-5802           (202) 225-5802  (202) 225-5802                (248) 273-4227  (248) 273-4227           (248) 273-4227  (248) 273-4227 MI 9th District
Dina Titus                (202) 225-3252  (202) 225-3252           (202) 225-3252  (202) 225-3252 702-256-DINA (3462) NV 3rd District
Carol Shea-Porter                (202) 225-5456  (202) 225-5456           (202) 225-5456  (202) 225-5456                (603) 743-4813  (603) 743-4813           (603) 743-4813  (603) 743-4813 NH 1st District
Tim Bishop                (202) 225-3826  (202) 225-3826           (202) 225-3826  (202) 225-3826                (631) 696-6500  (631) 696-6500           (631) 696-6500  (631) 696-6500 NY 1st District
John Hall                (202) 225-5441  (202) 225-5441           (202) 225-5441  (202) 225-5441                (845) 225-3641  (845) 225-3641           (845) 225-3641  (845) 225-3641 x49371 NY 19th District
Bill Owens                (202) 225-4611  (202) 225-4611           (202) 225-4611  (202) 225-4611                (315) 782-3150  (315) 782-3150           (315) 782-3150  (315) 782-3150 NY 23rd District
Mike Arcuri                (202)225-3665  (202)225-3665           (202)225-3665  (202)225-3665                (315)793-8146  (315)793-8146           (315)793-8146  (315)793-8146 NY 24th District
Dan Maffei                (202) 225-3701  (202) 225-3701           (202) 225-3701  (202) 225-3701                (315) 423-5657  (315) 423-5657           (315) 423-5657  (315) 423-5657 NY 25th District
Earl Pomeroy                (202) 225-2611  (202) 225-2611           (202) 225-2611  (202) 225-2611                (701) 224-0355  (701) 224-0355           (701) 224-0355  (701) 224-0355 ND At-Large District
Steven Driehaus                (202) 225-2216  (202) 225-2216           (202) 225-2216  (202) 225-2216                (513) 684-2723  (513) 684-2723           (513) 684-2723  (513) 684-2723 OH 1st District
Mary Jo Kilroy                (202) 225-2015  (202) 225-2015           (202) 225-2015  (202) 225-2015                (614) 294-2196  (614) 294-2196           (614) 294-2196  (614) 294-2196 OH 15th District
Zach Space                (202) 225-6265  (202) 225-6265           (202) 225-6265  (202) 225-6265                (330) 364-4300  (330) 364-4300           (330) 364-4300  (330) 364-4300 OH 18th District
Kathy Dahlkemper                (202) 225-5406  (202) 225-5406           (202) 225-5406  (202) 225-5406                (814) 456-2038  (814) 456-2038           (814) 456-2038  (814) 456-2038 PA 3rd District
Patrick Murphy                (202) 225-4276  (202) 225-4276           (202) 225-4276  (202) 225-4276                (215) 826-1963  (215) 826-1963           (215) 826-1963  (215) 826-1963 PA 8th District
Christopher Carney                (202) 225-3731  (202) 225-3731           (202) 225-3731  (202) 225-3731                (570) 585-9988  (570) 585-9988           (570) 585-9988  (570) 585-9988 PA 10th District
Paul Kanjorski                (202) 225-6511  (202) 225-6511           (202) 225-6511  (202) 225-6511                (570) 825-2200  (570) 825-2200           (570) 825-2200  (570) 825-2200 PA 11th District
John Spratt                (202) 225-5501  (202) 225-5501           (202) 225-5501  (202) 225-5501                (803)327-1114  (803)327-1114           (803)327-1114  (803)327-1114 SC 5th District
Tom Perriello                (202) 225-4711  (202) 225-4711           (202) 225-4711  (202) 225-4711                (276) 656-2291  (276) 656-2291           (276) 656-2291  (276) 656-2291 VA 5th District
Alan Mollohan                (202) 225-4172  (202) 225-4172           (202) 225-4172  (202) 225-4172                (304) 623-4422  (304) 623-4422           (304) 623-4422  (304) 623-4422 WVA 1st District
Nick Rahall                (202) 225-3452  (202) 225-3452           (202) 225-3452  (202) 225-3452                (304) 252-5000  (304) 252-5000           (304) 252-5000  (304) 252-5000 WVA 3rd District
Steve Kagen                (202) 225-5665  (202) 225-5665           (202) 225-5665  (202) 225-5665                (920) 437-1954  (920) 437-1954           (920) 437-1954  (920) 437-1954 WI 8th District

We must make every effort to fax, call and even personally visit every key congressman in their offices in Washington DC.
Select Here SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

Keep calling your Senators and Representatives today, toll free numbers include               1-877-851-6437         1-877-851-6437 and               1-866-220-0044         1-866-220-0044, or call toll               1-202-225-3121         1-202-225-3121 AND REGISTER YOUR OUTRAGE at Arrogant ObamaCare TAX Increase!

CALL PRESIDENT OBAMA               202-456-1111         202-456-1111 and               202-456-1414         202-456-1414 expressing your outrage at incompetence in crippling and obstructing the “bipartisan healthcare reform summit”.

DO NOT BE SILENCED — MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!

NOTE: We need TENS OF THOUSANDS of faxes and PHONE CALLS and EMAILS delivered to ALL Congressmen right away!

This is a fight for the very heart of America. We can WIN this fight! With Senate Republicans now forcing Democrats to “ping-pong” the Obamacare bill back and forth between the two Houses, we can capitalize on the divisions within the Democrat Party itself! If we can STOP Reid and Pelosi from getting enough votes in either House — that means THE BILL WOULD DIE!

We CAN still win, by keeping the Democrats from getting the votes they need to pass Obamacare… but we can’t do it without YOUR help!

We must make every effort to fax, call and even personally visit every key congressman in their offices in Washington DC.
Select Here SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

This fight CAN BE WON! Please, take action right away to STOP this bill in the U.S. Congress!

Sincerely,

 

Matters of Religion Should Never be Matters of Controversy for Tea Party Protesters – The BOPAC Report

March 2, 2010

The BOPAC Report:

Matters of Religion Should Never be Matters of Controversy for Tea Party Protesters

Today I’ve been mostly reflecting on recklessness that we’ve been witnessing in Washington D.C. and what some are calling the one year anniversary of the Tea Party Movement.  I want to say is that I am truly thankful that millions of ordinary Americans have been so moved by what they’ve seen in American politics that they made time to care for the country that has been so important in their lives.  Thank you, thank you, and thank you!  I can only imagine how little hope there would be today had you not stood up and shouted ENOUGH loud enough for the politicians to hear. Oh, and thanks CNBC Correspondent Rick Santelli for getting it all started.

At first the Tea Parties were ignored and when they kept growing, the vilification process began in earnest in the Halls of Congress & in the mainstream media.  The disparagement began as commentators’ smirks, belittlement and mischaracterizations as to who was involved and what the they were about.  As the protests grew and politicians began being forced to address hard questions in town hall meetings, the discomfort level of the media and politicians increased exponentially.  So did the insults.

Finally, one term of disparagement/diminution stuck. A few pompous media personalities set out to attach these mostly novice protesters to the derogatory terms Tea-Bagger and Tea-Bagging (some sort of sex act thing). It became a juvenile favorite among Democrat politicians such as Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Schumer.  Why? I have no idea.  If you see images of the hundreds of thousands (millions) of these Americans engaged in peaceful protests, ‘tea-bagger’ is the last thing that would come to mind.  Most of the protesters shrug it off realizing that actually saying the term reflects most badly on those using it.  However, each has their own way of dealing with double standards and ridicule.

I’ve never been able to understand why a Republican contributor is a ‘fat cat’ and a Democratic contributor of the same amount of money is a ‘public-spirited philanthropist’.
Ronald Reagan

If an analogy must be made to a Tea Bag, then let’s do with a bit more accuracy to reflect the broad range of ordinary Americans picking up protest signs for the first time.  From what I can tell, Tea Party folks more often than not come with lots of experience because most have a few years under their belts. 

Let’s say we imagine the piece of paper attached to the tea bag string as the label tea party members might use to identify themselves to everyone else – Conservative, Moderate, Independent, Republican, Democrat, Liberal, Native American, African-American, White, Asian, Catholic, Baptist, Jew, Christian, Agnostic, Professor, Professional, Tradesman, etc., etc., etc. (I wanted to include Muslim but I haven’t actually seen anyone self identify.) It’s a big tent based on principle.

The string is the part that connects everyone together, the collective consciousness of experience that reminds each of us that some things are time tested, work well and might just pull America out of the hot water before it’s too late.

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Volume 1, 1905

As far as I can tell, this is the essence of the movement.  It reflects common sense understandings of economics and how to get our economy moving.  Experience shows that private sector does much better than a federal bureaucracy when it comes to jump starting the economy and making the system sustainable because the private sector is concerned facts and success – not their own political ideologies, beauty contests and careers. (Congress tinkering with ‘risk’ in the mortgage market caused the current economic crisis – everyone must own a home even if they can’t afford it. Right now, uncertainty regarding the possibility of tax hikes coming from Obama are what’s shackling the economy.)

Tea party people know the U.S. government’s massive debt is not sustainable.  They want politicians to stop raising taxes (actually most want to cut taxes) and to cut spending. They want America to live within its means and not pass unbearable debt to their children.

They want politicians to face the truth of our economy!  Yes, there will be pain but most Americans surely recognize we can get through it together.  However, if government does not face the truth about our economy soon, the pain will be catastrophic and our liberties could be put at risk because of civil unrest.

The truth is cruel, but it can be loved, and it makes free those who have loved it.

George Santayana, Little Essays (1920) “Ideal Immortality”

The tea party movement is not anti-government.  They want the federal government to do the things they are authorized to do under the Constitution with as small a ‘footprint’ as possible (including reasonable regulation of business).  I believe a majority wants their own states to do the heavy lifting on tax utilization and governing.  However, they want politicians to not be in bed with union leaders (special interests) because experience shows that union leaders’ greed is a big factor in the fiscal calamities facing many states today. (A 49-year-old NJ public employee (union member) who pays in a $124,000 and receives 3.3 million in benefits from state coffers.)

I suspect a vast majority of the ordinary Americans who make up the tea party movement do not want the government to take over the healthcare system. And yes, they do want reform.  They want incremental steps to be taken to reform healthcare.  They do not want a massive bill when politicians’ motives are suspect and the consequences cannot possibly be fully understood. Start over with everyone at the table.

No one tests the depth of a river with both feet.

African Proverb

Most in the movement want politicians to respect the Constitutional limitations placed on government, respect state rights, and the rights of the individual.

People know instinctually and by experience that child rearing with too much parental control will either be met with some type of resistance (outright rebellion, passive aggression behavior) or cowering (timid, afraid, distrust).  Neither is what America needs of her citizenry.

It is the individual’s task to differentiate himself from all the others and stand on his own feet. All collective identities… interfere with the fulfillment of this task. Such collective identities are crutches for the lame, shields for the timid, beds for the lazy, nurseries for the irresponsible….

C. G. Jung, Memories, Dreams, Reflections

People realize that the Constitution is the first line of defense protecting their freedoms and limiting a federal government that appears ready to dictate without the consent of the people.  Most understand that the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution established the requirement that the power of the federal government comes from the people and states – not the other way around.  I think most tea party protesters want the federal government to back off and lift the boot off their necks. 

In fact, several states have recognized the danger this Administration poses to our 2nd and 10th Amendment rights and are beginning to take action.  Three states have passed the Firearms Freedom Act and 22 others have introduced it for consideration. The FFA basically says that firearms manufactured and sold within a state’s borders are out of reach of the federal government’s interstate commerce powers. Numerous states have introduced legislation asserting their Tenth Amendment rights under the Constitution.  Several others are introducing legislation that will require candidates to submit proof that they are in fact eligible for the office they are seeking (i.e. being a ‘natural born citizen’). We will see soon if our Federal Courts have become so corrupted and/or influenced by the ’progressives’ ideology that they will not exercise their duties and act as a check to the powers of the Congress and the President.

Tea Party protesters do not want to be treated like sheep by their government and elected representatives.  This is partly why it is important that the ‘tea party’ not be taken over by any major Party.  The tea party idea is about holding all politicians accountable, not just the ones in a particular party. 

People choose politicians who should understand local values and concerns to represent their interests in Washington regardless of which Party they belong.

I do not want my house to be walled in on all sides and my windows to be stuffed. I want the cultures of all the lands to be blown about my house as freely as possible. But I refuse to be blown off my feet by any.

Mahatma Gandhi (1869 – 1948)

The people of California are not the same as the people from Georgia and both should have their interests represented in strong state governments and by elected Congressional Representatives – and neither should be blown off their feet.

I’ve been using a few quotes from the philosopher George Santayana to illustrate the need to keep our state governments strong, retaining their rights and responsibilities under the Constitution. Mr. Santayana ”…was committed to a naturalist metaphysics, in which human cognition, cultural practices, and social institutions have evolved so as to harmonize with the conditions present in their environment. Their value may then be adjudged by the extent to which they facilitate human happiness.“

To me, understanding local environmental and ethnic influences reveals the richness of America’s cultural diversity. It’s why we want our representatives to be local becuase they are (should be) more aware of who ‘they’ are and what conditions have shaped the ‘we’ of the locality.  This way change & governance evolve locally in response to the ‘happiness’ or unhappiness of its residents. It also validates the wisdom of our Founders who created a Constitution meant to insure equality of opportunity (not results) and equal protection for every person in every state.  The Constitution is a safety net preventing tyranny or abuse at the muncipal or state level while containing safeguards that protect the individual character of states and their people ( First, Second, Ninth, Tenth, Fourteenth Amendments).

If states like California and New York raise taxes too much or restricts rights and liberties too much, people and business remain free to vote with their feet.  That’s a good thing because it applies market forces to states that might encourage their politicians to act responsibility. States and regions have different flavors that appeal to varied tastes and that’s wonderful.  Just like most people do not want the flavor of another forcibly imposed upon their lives – neither do states.

Even though it’s understandable that some residents of states currently crumbling under the weight of unfair public employee labor and pension contracts and out of control politicians may be susceptible to Obama’s proclivity for a socialist system that might subsidize their state’s excesses with taxes from the innocent states, it must be resisted and responsibility demanded of their own politicians.  The good people of Texas should not be forced to bail out irresponsible politicians in California or any other state.  Today responsible people can always move and let California collapse under the weight of its own gluttony. However, if we allow the federal government to continue grow in power and influence that may not always be the case. Many times taking what appears to be the easiest path is the one that leads to the greatest loss.

The same arguments can be made in support of America’s sovereignty. Most Americans do not want to give up that which has been paid for with the blood and treasure of the millions who came before to France, Germany, Spain, any other country or the UN.  Our freedoms and Constitutional protections are not barter items.  We can fulfill our global responsibilities as good neighbors without sacrificing our sovereignty.

A man’s feet should be planted in his country, but his eyes should survey the world.

George Santayana (1863 – 1952)

The tea bag string is the determined call for fiscal responsibility, accountability, equality of opportunity, and limited representative government.

The tea bag is our United States Constitution that has guided this nation for centuries.  It’s the fabric that holds us together and protects our liberties. Without which, we would blow away like dry leaves of tea facing the winds of tyranny.

One man with a gun can control 100 without one.
Vladimir Lenin

One person cannot stand against tyranny alone. It will take many armed with all of the rights and liberties that they can preserve (including the right to bear arms).

America is the greatest of opportunities and the worst of influences.

George Santayana (1863 – 1952)

It’s these influences that are putting our liberties at risk today. 

An educational system that does not adequately teach the Constitution, our founding, or America’s goodness is making it likely our children will not recognize threats to their freedom and liberty.

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.
Ronald Reagan

Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.
Vladimir Lenin

It’s the patience of ‘progressivism’ that has been working insidiously for decades to undermine our system of governance. It’s politicians who work diligently to create voter dependency through the sense of ‘entitlement’.  It’s politicians who will not face the truth of our economy and who print trillions of dollars to ensure their positions.

The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency.
Vladimir Lenin

It’s the influence of special interests that corrupt and seduce politicians to do their bidding instead watching out for the interests of the people.  It’s politicians who lack conviction to principles.

To rely upon conviction, devotion, and other excellent spiritual qualities; that is not to be taken seriously in politics.
Vladimir Lenin

It’s the influence of those in the inner circle of the Administration.

There are no morals in politics; there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.
Vladimir Lenin

Is Lenin talking about Rahm Emanuel?

The tea is who we are.  It’s the experiences of each individual that has shaped his or her life and views.  It’s the diversity of the tea party movement.  In the tea party movement all ethic groups are represented, many are Veterans, many have family members in the military, and there are Christians, Jews, agnostics, and probably atheists.  There are those who represent rural and urban ways of life. There are pro-life, pro-choice, gay, straight, environmentalists, pro-gun, pro-10th Amendment, and those calling for the ‘natural born citizen’ provision of the Constitution to be honored.  There are Conservatives, Liberals, and Moderates. There are Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and Independents. 

From what I can see, people in the tea party movement are striving to be tolerant of the views of others as long as they don’t jeopardize the nation’s future.

Intolerance itself is a form of egoism, and to condemn egoism intolerantly is to share it.

George Santayana, Winds of Doctrine (1913) ch. 4

If the movement is to survive and flourish, egotism and intolerance must be kept in check.  If it’s not, we become them.  At the next local event, maybe I will tie the string from a tea bag around my finger to help me remember to keep my own intolerance in check and to focus on the issues the Tea Party movement has grown around.

It’s my strong opinion that the tea party movement must not be folded into any major party and that it not form its own official party. If it forms its own party, it may then feel compelled to have a platform that addresses the social issues and that could alienate many.  This is such a special movement and it would be sad to see it diminish.

This year it is critical to vote for those who have the best chance of removing absolute control from Obama, Pelosi and Reid’s Democratic Party.  The vote must not be split in 2010.  However, every Republican or Independent candidate who wins needs to be made aware that they will be held accountable for their lack of transparency, lack of fiscal discipline, and lack of adherence to the Constitution.

We will surely disagree in the future about the social issues and that will be okay.  However, today millions are united around a core set of issues that are crucial for the survival of the nation. We must not blow it. Fiscal responsibility, accountability, transparency, and limited government are the issues of the coming election.

I think I will close with one last quote of George Santayana (who was an agnostic) that seems applicable to the idea of focusing on the big picture this year.

Matters of religion should never be matters of controversy. We neither argue with a lover about his taste, not condemn him, if we are just, for knowing so human a passion.

George Santayana (1863 – 1952)

Well – unless they want to kill you if they can’t convert you.

In such case, I offer this quote:

It is better to die on your feet than live on your knees.

Emiliano Zapata (1877 – 1919)

Senator Scott Brown’s American Truck, the Cargo Cult and a Siren’s Song – The BOPAC Report

February 25, 2010

Senator Scott Brown’s American Truck, the Cargo Cult and a Siren’s Song

Recently, Republican Senator Scott Brown worried many of his supporters by voting in favor of cloture, moving Sen. Harry Reid’s  ‘Jobs’ bill forward in the U.S. Senate.  Given that Sen. Brown’s campaign had in fact focused on his independence in the Massachusetts legislature, his vote did not surprise me.  However in light of Washington Democrats’ oblivious lockstep march towards the tried and failed ideals of socialism, I held out some hope that Sen. Brown would recognize that bi-partisanship could wait until Blue Dog Democrats wrest some control of the Democratic Party away from the radical left.  Don’t get me wrong, it’s fine to debate the limits of social and economic responsibility under the Constitution in a bi-partisan manner, but to negotiate with those attempting to undermine the Constitution and American sovereignty is pointless. America needs to win.

It’s going to take a sound thumping of both ‘progressive’ Democrats and ‘progressive’ light Republicans in 2010, if the American experiment, our representative republic, has any chance of surviving.  If fact, it may already be too late unless real changes begin to be made in the psyche of ordinary Americans. The problem is that people tend to vote for who and what they perceive as being in their own self-interest.  I would suggest that many of these voters are in fact not voting in their self-interest, but are answering a siren’s song – a song sung mainly by Obama and the Democratic Party.

It’s a song meant to blind Americans to the reality of what’s required for sustainable, fiscally responsible government; and for that matter, the requirements for individual fiscal responsibility. It’s a song meant to sear the flesh of Americans with distorted notions of the responsibilities of our federal government. It’s a song meant to establish the mindset of entitlement from cradle to grave. It’s a song that makes it politically incorrect to urge personal responsibility or suggest that consequences might fall on those seduced by shortsighted destructive Democrat rhetoric. It’s a song that ultimately leads to less liberty and freedom. 

The Democratic Party has always been concerned with creating and maintaining the dependence of voters, setting themselves up as the protectors of entitlements.  Even when they fail to achieve what they have promised, they milk their efforts for every drop of voter loyalty they can get and vilify anyone daring to look at the true fiscal ramifications of their actions. It’s been that way for years.

However today’s Democrats take it even further, they know full well what they are promising/creating is not sustainable and will bankrupt the nation. (Cap & Trade, Stimulus, Bailouts, Government takeovers, Healthcare, etc.) Yet they continue to attempt to ram their ideas down the throats of Americans even though large majorities dislike them.

Could it really be they believe any legislative success, no matter how damaging to America’s economy, will help their own political futures in the 2010 elections?  Get past the elections and then find a way to blame George Bush, Republicans, or even Ahmadinejad when the house of cards collapse. Some have suggested their true strategy is cause the collapse of the entire system; then take over and start over with something much less a meritocracy, something with more centralized control, something more akin to socialism.  Either way, America suffers.

Look at Social Security and Medicare.  This year Social Security began paying out more in benefits than it receives in tax revenues. It’s clearly not sustainable. Social Security in dire shape and action needs to be taken yesterday. But, Obama knows that people who have paid Social Security taxes for their entire working life will punish anyone who dares change the system in order to make it more sustainable for future generations?  Social Security is a sacred cow that can’t be touched without political consequences being paid at the next election.  Democrats cannot afford to add to voter anger right now about Social Security.  Not yet

So what do they do? They ignore Social Security and set off to create an even bigger entitlement.

What will happen IF Government run healthcare becomes a reality?  Instead of one or two sacred cows, they are creating a sacred herd to be fed by small business and taxpayers?

Democrats are selling Obama’s healthcare program by saying it will lower healthcare costs.  They know it will not.  You cannot insure 30 million more people and expect costs to go down.  The only things that will go down are the quality of care and the ability of the patient to determine their own treatment. Rationed care will be the outcome and it will suck to be old.

Once Obamacare is put in place and health workers unionized, a new self-serving voting block will be created that will be able to block everything they oppose regardless of how it effects ordinary Americans.  A unionized government run healthcare will be able to prevent politicians who they perceive as threats from ever being elected and prevent meaningful changes from taking place.  It happened in the UK.

How many unionized health workers would emerge in a government run healthcare system?  Healthcare is 20% of America’s economy – tens of millions?

It really is like Benjamin Franklin said at the founding of this nation:

“When the people find they can vote themselves money,
that will herald the end of the republic.” Benjamin Franklin

From what I can surmise, millions of Americans who pay absolutely no federal income tax already have the expectation that Obamacare will be free for them.  I see few people who actually know the details of what is being proposed.   How it will be paid for seems to be of even less interest to them.  Obama and Democrats have effectively been making the case to non-taxpayers that ‘money fairies’ will fly out of the butts of ‘rich fat cats’ to pay for healthcare for them.

There is no display of awareness among non-taxpayers that government cannot continue to raise taxes on small business owners.  Eventually, business will say enough.  They will be forced or choose to sell/close their businesses, take their nest eggs, retire and watch the bewilderment on the faces of Americans wondering where the jobs are.  There will be a point where it is just not worth the price of having to deal with an overreaching government and selfish labor unions demanding higher and higher benefits without regard to how it effects business viability. 

America should be in a recovery with job creation by now, but uncertainty about higher taxes and restrictions coming out of the Obama administration has everyone in the business world gun-shy. (That’s the same reason several health insurance providers are now raising their rates, they can’t predict what will happen tomorrow.)

In international development work today, the dominant idea is sustainability.  And, the most important factors that predict project sustainability are when people in communities have identified their own needs and when they have a real stake in the project (money, labor, time, etc.).  Of course, free projects seem most attractive, but free frequently fails in development work. If communities themselves have identified the problem (as opposed to having an outside ‘expert’ telling the community what they need) and they have a sufficient stake, personal investment  – they are more likely to become empowered and take responsible for both the project and consequences. 

(It’s like the requirement for a down payment when purchasing a house. It’s much more likely that such a person will do all they can to make payments so they don’t lose their investment.)

Free has been tried over and over in development work. It fails over and over. In International Development simply throwing money at problems does not work. If fact, frequently it does more harm than good. The worst outcome one can imagine is the ‘Cargo Cult’ mentality that arose in the Pacific shortly after World War II. Unfortunately, it looks like many Americans are well on their way down that same road and politicians are encouraging it.

During World War II, Americans and Japanese forces brought millions of tons of material and lots of manpower to the Pacific Islands. Most villagers had little awareness of the how, where, or why the goods came to their islands. The goods came and came and expectations rose that goods would keep coming even after the troops left the islands.  ‘Cargo Cults’ had existed before WWII but they had a major revival after the war in the Pacific.  Instead of relying on themselves, looking to themselves, making decisions based on their own situations, Pacific Island villagers became seduced by the hope of easy pickings. “To attract further deliveries of goods, followers of the cults engaged in ritualistic practices such as building crude imitation landing strips, aircraft and radio equipment, and mimicking the behaviour that they had observed of the military personnel operating them.”

How is that different from the ritualistic practice of voting for a particular Party in hopes of getting something for free? Or consumers holding off making purchases they need in order to wait for some sort of  ‘cash for clunkers’ government deal? Or Cash for Caulkers? The seduction of free stuff falling from the sky with no effort on anyone’s part is tempting I suppose. Free healthcare, free social security, no hard decisions, fat pensions subsidized by ordinary taxpayers, cash for clunkers, no personal responsibility – wow that sounds too good to be true.  It is.  There is always a price that has to be paid.

However, it seems that more and more Americans could really care less as long as someone else pays their way through life, as long as benefits continue to drop from the sky.  The song is strong, hard to resist, and it impearls our Republic’s future.

‘Entitlements’ cause people to vote for the politicians making unrealistic promises and to fear those who speak of mundane things like balanced budgets.  They cause people to become complacent (lazy) and selfish. (I have a cousin that wouldn’t consider starting to look for work until her unemployment actually ran out.) They cause voting blocks to form that look almost always at what they can receive and almost never at what they may need to sacrifice for the well being of the Republic. (AARP, NAACP, ACORN, SEIU) They make it possible for politicians to attack other rights and freedoms vis-à-vis the dependency on a particular entitlement such as government run healthcare should it be enacted (guns, smoking, drinking, eating habits, etc.).  When one is in the trance of the siren’s song, it’s easy to pick one’s pocket. Furthermore, ‘entitlements’ influenced/controlled by politicians make individuals afraid to rock the boat out of fear they may lose benefits.  (Look what happened to Larry Sinclair and his Social Security Disability for continuing with his allegations that he and Obama did drugs and engaged in consensual sex in 1999.)

Americans have to know (on some level) that the nation is at or near bankruptcy; and believing in Obama’s ‘flying money fairies’ does not change reality. Our Republic is just there – a shining beacon on the hill and all it requires is for Americans to choose Representatives who most closely represent our aspired to values and principles, but if enough of us answer the siren’s song…you know the rest.

If people who receive or may receive benefits from the government in the future were to actually vote their own best interest – they would be looking closely at the sustainability of government programs (the long view), the proper role of government, Constitutional limitations, the health of the Republic, effects on business/taxpayers, fairness, our values and principles, protecting individual rights, freedoms and responsibilities.   They would not be voting based on who promises to give them the most.

They would recognize that the government must act in a fiscal responsible manner if critical programs are to survive in the future for the disabled, infirm and those who truly find themselves in situations requiring assistance.

One day every person will need a hand up and a hand needs to be there to help – not just one extended in exchange for a vote. (I certainly have needed that hand in my lifetime.)

There is really only one way that might encourage people to take their own power of personal initiative back and protects their rights/freedoms from government and politicians.  It is a way that encourages people in moderate need to rely on their friends and families – and illuminates the importance of both.  It is a way that encourages the restoration of individual dignity.  It’s not PC – not because it’s not – but because politicians don’t want it to be. However, if enacted, it would actually free politicians to vote for what’s in the best long-term interest of their constituents.  It requires a choice to be made by the individual as to when or if they reach their hand up for assistance from the government.

Imagine what would happen if when a person went on welfare, received worker’s compensation, unemployment, social security, opted for a ‘public healthcare option’ or received some other government benefit – they surrender the privilege of voting. (Unless they were determined to be permanently disabled or permanently unable to be gainfully employed.)

Wouldn’t that encourage injured workers (citizens) to come back to work earlier or unemployed workers to look a little harder? Maybe hunting season isn’t as important as voting.  (For some it wouldn’t matter and they probably shouldn’t be voting anyway.)

Wouldn’t it encourage people to get off the public dole as quickly as they could?

Wouldn’t it encourage older citizens of sufficient means to not draw social security at all?  Social Security was set up as a safety net, not a retirement plan.

Wouldn’t it encourage some senior citizens old enough to draw social security but in good health to delay leaving the work force?

Wouldn’t it encourage older small business owners to stay in business a few years longer?

Wouldn’t it allow politicians to actually do their jobs and make such programs sustainable without fear of the next election? 

It’s like the Republic is Sen. Scott Brown’s old American truck going up a steep mountain.  The engine powering the truck is small business and taxpayers. And every other person the truck passes is encouraged by Scott’s Democratic friends in the Senate to climb in back for a free ride with the only charge being a pat on the back and the promise of their vote.  Pretty soon the truck, the Republic, has millions of people piled in its bed. The tires start to bulge and engine begins to sputter. The gas tank is almost empty and not one will get out of the truck first to help push.  Not one union, not one person wants to be first to help Scott Brown or his American truck by pulling their own weight while others ride.  Pretty soon the truck’s tires explode, the engine’s timing belt breaks, a piston rod snaps – everything stops – with the exception of the finger pointing at Scott Brown for not maintaining his (our) American truck.

Dear Senator Scott Brown:  The time for bi-partisanship is not yet here, not until the Blue Dogs restore the Democratic Party to something that is not trying to destroy the Constitution and our freedoms.  Republicans should proudly take the title of being ‘the Party of kNOw’ because they know what’s going on.

I do realize that there may be a few Constitutional problems with limiting people’s ability to vote. However, if Obama can so easily flaunt Article II, Section I of the Constitution that requires every person who is elected to the Office of the Presidency to be a ‘natural born citizen’, what’s the problem?

Note:  I need to credit Rush Limbaugh for mentioning the cargo cults recently on the radio. Rush’s comment planted the seed for this article. 

Rush’s face is on Janet Napoliano’s golf balls!

Just like Obama is not Malcolm X - Obama is not a "Natural Born Citizen"! Obama may look like Malcolm X and Obama may be a "Citizen"; but being a "Citizen" does not necessarily mean that Obama is a "Natural Born Citizen"! Joint Chiefs of Staff’s new mottos: Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil & Don’t rock the boat!

Philip Berg Calls for March on Washington – Second Amendment March in April – Quo Warranto Chrysler? – Why Obama Eligibility Matters – 2010 Election Suggestions HillBuzz – Ahmadinejad Watch – Ahmadinejad Going to Pakistan – The BOPAC Report

February 4, 2010

The BOPAC Report

Natural Born Citizen Issue –

Where's the documentation that proves that Obama is a 'natural born citizen'?

Marches on Washington –

From CitizenWells:

Just in from Philip J Berg, February 4, 2010.

For Immediate Release:  – 02/03/2010

For Further Information Contact:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Cell       (610) 662-3005         (610) 662-3005

              (610) 825-3134         (610) 825-3134

              (800) 993-PHIL         (800) 993-PHIL  [7445]

Fax (610) 834-7659

philjberg@obamacrimes.com

Berg Announces


“Birth Certificate March on Washington”
to Demand Obama Resign
as Obama is not
“Constitutionally qualified”
to be President

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 02/03/10) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States announces “Birth Certificate March on Washington” demanding Obama resign as President as he is “Constitutionally ineligible” to be President.

Berg is requesting all citizens of the United States to email, fax or mail a “copy” of their Birth Certificate that will be presented to Obama demanding that Obama resign because he has failed to produce his long form [vault] Birth Certificate to show he is “Constitutionally eligible” to be President.

Berg related an email he received.  A woman from Texas told me she registered her thirteen [13] year old nephew for school.  When registration was finished, her nephew asked the Principal, “Can I ask you a question?”  The Principal said, “Yes.”  Her nephew said, “How come I had to show my Birth Certificate to register for school, but Obama did not have to show his to be President ?”

Berg said, “That email motivated me to continue to expose Obama for the fraud he is !”

Berg continued, “Since the Courts are taking their time to get to the point of allowing ‘Discovery,’ it is time to motivate the citizens of the United States for a ‘Peaceful Revolution’ to expose the ‘HOAX’ of Obama, the biggest ‘HOAX’ in the history of our country, in over 230 years !”

Berg wants people to email, fax or mail a copy of Their Birth Certificate to:

Email = philjberg@obamacrimes.com

Fax      = (610) 834-7659

Mail    =  Obamacrimes
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Berg said, “Then, we will be preparing them to deliver to Obama demanding that he resign from the Office of President as he has not proven that he is “Constitutionally eligible” to be President and   that Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his ‘adopted’ name of ‘Barry Soetoro’ from Indonesia.

I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in ‘our’ U.S.A., for ‘our’ forefathers and for the 3.2 million men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution with our ‘Peaceful Revolution’ to prove that Obama is not Constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President.”   

Berg continued, “I still have cases pending in the Federal Courts.  Go to obamacrimes.com to see the status of each case.”

For copies of all Press Releases and Court Pleadings, go to

obamacrimes.com

From World Net Daily comes information about a case many have been following.  We’re still waiting for the Quo Warranto filing.

Chrysler bankruptcy lawyers raise eligibility question

Defense of dealer dismissals cites question of Obama’s birth

Posted: February 03, 2010

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Lawyers defending the government-orchestrated deal by which Chrysler was purchased by Fiat and hundreds of dealers were thrown out of the network have raised President Barack Obama’s eligibility for office as a possible issue in the dispute.

In a footnote in their latest court filing, attorneys representing the old car company at the firm of Jones Day have cited a “scheme” purportedly on the part of the lawyers for the former Chrysler dealers – the plaintiffs in the case.

“Although the debtors have no independent knowledge of these matters, the debtors have taken note of certain public statements connecting the motion to a crusade involving the movants’ counsel to challenge Barack Obama’s legitimacy as president of the United States,” the court filing states. “For example, one report has stated: Birthers are launching yet another scheme … [that] involves a legal maneuver known as ‘quo warranto,’ a prerogative writ requiring the person to whom it is directed to show what authority he has for exercising some right or power (or ‘franchise’) he claims to hold.”

Attorney Stephen Pidgeon, who along with Leo Donofrio is representing more than 70 former Chrysler dealerships put out of business

by the machinations involved in granting massive quantities of taxpayer funds to Chrysler, which then was taken over by Fiat, said it’s a good sign for the case.

“This is very encouraging because they are attempting to distract the court from the law, a tactic they would not employ if they truly thought the law was on their side. … This case is getting very interesting,” he said.

On his blog, Donofrio agreed. ….Continue Reading

Effects of Undermined Constitution –

Dalai Lama has advice for Obama! America Must Demand Proof or Face the Consequences!

Besides being a blatant violation of the Constitution, the question of Obama’s eligibility to serve as President vitally important because of the ability of Obama to put people on the Supreme Court who may believe the Constitution to be nothing more than a piece of paper.

White House Prepares for Possibility of 2 Supreme Court Vacancies

SCOTUS Watchers Believe Justices Stevens and Ginsburg Could Decide to Step Aside

By ARIANE de VOGUE

WASHINGTON, Jan. 4, 2010—

Lawyers for President Obama have been working behind the scenes to prepare for the possibility of one, and maybe two Supreme Court vacancies this spring.

Court watchers believe two of the more liberal members of the court, justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, could decide to step aside for reasons of age and health. That would give the president his second and third chance to shape his legacy on the Supreme Court.

Last week, when Obama took the nearly unprecedented step of criticizing the court’s opinion in a major campaign finance case during his State of the Union speech, some believed he was showcasing for the American people that presidential elections, and Supreme Court nominations count. …Continue Reading

ChiBama Politics –

 

Obama's "GANGSTER" Government!

No Turds In 2010 - Democrat, Republican, or Independent Turds - Vote For Fiscal Responsibility and Those Who Will Support The Constitution! Note: I'm not calling Obama a Nazi. I'm calling his movement fascist because it constantly seeks to ruin, ridicule, intimidate and/or censor everyone who questions Obama's honesty or his policies. It's crap!

Turning to the 2010 elections, the folks at Hill Buzz have a few suggestions to focus on.

From the HillBuzz:

February 3, 2010

The five 2010 races we want to be involved in

Posted by hillbuzz under Uncategorized | Tags: 2010 goals, Five Races to Follow in 2010 |

After much thought and consideration, here are the five 2010 races we want to be involved in:

(1) Re-electing Michelle Bachmann in Minnesota (House)

(2) Defeating Barbara Boxer in California (Senate)

(3) Defeating Alexi Giannoulias in Illinois (Senate candidate)

(4) Defeating Chuck Schumer in New York (Senate)

(5) Defeating Nancy Pelosi in California (House)

We’re well aware of what a longshot #5 is, but it’s time people stood up to Pelosi, and invested time and effort in a determined campaign to show the people of San Francisco exactly who she really is, and how she’s done nothing for her constituents, while helping to drive this nation into the ground.

Pelosi has decided to aim all of her cannons at Michelle Bachmann, making her the number one target of Democrats this year in House races.  Fair seems to only be fair in…Continue Reading

Second Amendment News –

We are family and we get to choose who's we! Chibama Politics & Obama's attack of Inspector General Walpin!

There will be a Second Amendment March on April 19, 2010 in Washington D.C.

The mission of the Second Amendment March is to galvanize the courage and resolve of Americans; to petition our elected officials against establishing anti-gun legislation; and to remind America that the Second Amendment is necessary to maintain our right to self defense.

It is the one right that protects all others.

We will accomplish our mission by a peaceful march in Washington DC, the United States Capitol, supported by satellite marches to State Capitols and smaller cities all across America.

The march in D.C. will take place on Monday, April 19, 2010 on the grounds of the Washington Monument.

O’Ji’bama‘had’ –

Ahmadinejad February 11th Watch

Come on Admadinejad - Confront Obama with his lack of eligibility! Tell him he's not a 'natural born citizen'!

Can you say Nuclear Technology?

From the Pakistan Times:

Iranian President to visit Pakistan soon

Pakistan Times Foreign Desk

TEHRAN (Iran): Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will soon visit Pakistan to develop a joint action plan for further boosting bilateral ties and strengthening tripartite contracts with Afghanistan on security issues.

We are in consultation through diplomatic channels to finalize dates of the visit, said Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki. This will be the first-ever visit of President Ahmadinejad, since he assumed the office.

He told a visiting Pakistani media delegation that it would be bilateral visit or part of trilateral conference between Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan.

During the last two years, their bilateral relationship received tremendous boost in all sectors of bilateral interest, he said hoping the forthcoming visit of President Ahmadinejad will further consolidate their deep-rooted historical and cultural relationship.

Brushing aside impression of any conflict between the two neighbouring countries, Manouchehr Mottaki said they have been maintaining close contacts to adopt common position on regional and international issues. Both sides attach high importance to expanding their socio-economic partnership, through projects like Gas pipeline.

We are good nieghbours and sincere friends and our common border is a border of friendship and peace, he remarked. Reiterating firm resolve of his country keeping their relations free-of-tension, Mottaki said, their relations are not against any third party, and his country will never allow third country to affect its relations with Pakistan.

Pakistan and Iran are part of single body. Condemning Zionist anti-Islamic policies world over, he said inimical forces, particularly Israel are bent upon to divide and harm us. But, he said they will never succeed….Continue Reading

Obamanomics – Natural Born Citizen – Gov. Jindal – Glenn Beck Hypocrisy – Commander Kerchner – Iran – Israel – Anti-Missile Systems – The BOPAC Report

February 1, 2010

The BOPAC Report

Natural Born Citizen and Glenn Beck –

 

Just like Obama is not Malcolm X - Obama is not a "Natural Born Citizen"! Obama may look like Malcolm X and Obama may be a "Citizen"; but being a "Citizen" does not necessarily mean that Obama is a "Natural Born Citizen"! Joint Chiefs of Staff’s new mottos: Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil & Don’t rock the boat!

Commander Kerchner has written Glenn Beck a second letter asking him to get involved the ‘natural born citizen’ issue.  I’ve written Glenn a couple of open letters and it appears that Mr. Beck has no intention to look into Obama’s eligibility to be President. 

I’ve taken a little different approach recently by pulling a Pelosi and pole vaulting over Obama to get a media discussion started regarding Gov. Jindal’s eligibility to serve as President.  Gov. Jindal is not a ‘natural born citizen’ either. 

I do wish that Gov. Jindal would man up and address his ineligibility to serve.

How could the media ignore a Jindal press conference? 

Feel free to send Gov. Jindal either of my last three articles:

http://australia.to/2010/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=785:the-2010-democratic-birther-strategy-media-bias-liberty-and-the-jindal-response&catid=94:breaking-news&Itemid=156

http://australia.to/2010/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=508:obama-eligibility-dear-talk-radio&catid=71:zach-jones&Itemid=124

http://australia.to/2010/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=447:trumping-political-and-judicial-courage-&catid=71:zach-jones&Itemid=124

From the blog of Mario Apuzzo, Esq. –

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Glenn … Are You Listening? Another Open Letter to Glenn Beck from Commander Kerchner

For Immediate Release — 1 February 2010

Glenn … Are You Listening? Another Open Letter to Glenn Beck

By: Charles Kerchner, Commander USNR (Retired)
Posted: 1 February 2010 at: http://puzo1.blogspot.com

Dear Glenn Beck :

Are you listening to the People? Are you listening to the members of your “912 Project” who are trying to talk to you on air about the “elephant in the room” of American political discussion and legal question about the 2008 election. Or are you still telling your call screeners to block their calls and/or moderate them out of your chat rooms just like the members of Congress do? Congress is not listening to the People. The election in Massachusetts showed you the results of what happens when the elected officials do not listen to the People. Are you not listening to the People anymore either or just selectively listening? The questions are not the questions of a fringe percentage of the people. See this recent survey: http://www.westernjournalism.com/?p=5697

A very large percentage, probably 75%+, of the “912 Project” folks and “Tea Party” folks believe that Obama is NOT constitutionally eligible to be the President or certainly at least want the matter fully and thoroughly discussed in public and investigated by the courts and Obama’s hidden and sealed early life original paper records unsealed and revealed. Photoshop’d digital images on the internet are legal proof of nothing. And then there is the issue for the 1961 newspaper ads you tout as infallible proof. They were not placed directly by family members but instead generated by the Hawaiian Health Department upon any birth registration in their system no matter what the source. Have you heard of the GIGO effect for birth registration systems. Falsified birth registration records in yields false record reports in Hawaiian newspapers out. This was likely done by the grandmother to get her newborn grandson U.S. citizenship, despite of where he might have really been born. Births could be registered with a mail-in form filled out by one family member for “at home” births. No one back then in Hawaii checked the credibility of the facts placed on that form. No one at the time was thinking 45 years into the future that this child might someday be a candidate for President and thus someone would question and check the underlying credibility of the facts on the mail-in form. Citizenship is the goal of any falsified birth registration in the U.S. Simple as that. Listen to this discussion on the Bill Cunningham radio show.

Glenn, are you giving these people who have supported you a voice? Or are you silencing their voices from getting on the air? If you don’t believe me, take a survey of them. …Continue Reading

I like Glenn Beck but the hypocrisy involved with saying ‘question with boldness’ and then ridiculing those who question Obama’s eligibility makes me believe that Glenn may be becoming half full of crap.

Like you Glenn but instead of ridiculing those questioning Obama's eligibility - question Jindal's eligibility. Take an enema and come back to the light!

Obama’s Foreign Policy –

 

Hillary's 3am Call vis-a-vis the Omnipresent Teleprompter to Obama!

Obama supported Chavez supporter/follower Zelaya during the Honduras crisis and ignored the opposition protesters in Iran when Ahmadinejad stole the election.  Is the deployment and sales of arms to Iran’s neighbors merely an attempt to buy time and keep Israel from attacking Iran?  Buy time to allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons? 

…The moves, which include the sales of anti-missile systems to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait, are designed to deter Iran from launching attacks against its Sunni Muslim neighbors and to send a message to Israel that a preemptive strike against Iran is unnecessary….

From FOX:

U.S. Missile Shield in Gulf Ups Ante With Iran

Tensions between the U.S. and Iran rose Monday after the Obama Administration quietly increased the capability of land and sea-based missile defenses in several Gulf nations to protect American allies.

Tensions between the U.S. and Iran rose Monday after the Obama Administration quietly increased the capability of land and sea-based missile defenses in several Gulf nations to protect American allies against a potential Iranian strike.

Administration officials said over the weekend that the U.S. was speeding up arms sales to a number of Gulf Arab states and that it had also deployed warships capable of knocking down hostile missiles in flight to the region.

The moves, which include the sales of anti-missile systems to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait, are designed to deter Iran from launching attacks against its Sunni Muslim neighbors and to send a message to Israel that a preemptive strike against Iran is unnecessary.

The deployments come as President Obama enters a new phase in efforts to halt Iran’s nuclear program after the failure of a diplomatic offensive….Continue Reading

Obama’s Iranian Policy?

 

Teleprompter holds Whitehouse Protocol Classes. Obama preparing for bow to Iran!

Unlike Obama, I take Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at his word and will be paying attention on February 11th.

CNN — Two top Iranian opposition leaders have called on supporters to protest on February 11, the anniversary of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, an opposition Web site reported.

According to The Green Way Web site, a meeting took place Saturday between opposition leaders Mehdi Karroubi and Mir Hossein Moussavi at Karroubi’s home.

They discussed the two executions that happened last week and the cases of 16 protesters who went on trial Saturday, the site reported.

“The widespread arrests of political activists and university students, the silencing of the media, and the forced confessions of prisoners are against the principles of Islam and the constitution of Iran,” the leaders said in a statement.

They also called for people to take to the streets on February 11 to demand their rights back as citizens of Iran, The Green Way reported.

Meanwhile, state-run Press TV quoted Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Sunday as saying that the nation will deliver a harsh blow to “global arrogance” on February 11.

Press TV offered no details on or explanation of the statement….Continue Reading

 

Obamanomics –

Obamanomics - It's a Crap Shoot! Spending Freeze? Not hardly!

 

This quote sums it up:

…. When the deficit is that size and you want to cut it meaningfully, you have to do more…

Analysts View: 2010 budget deficit to hit new record

7:43am EST

NEW YORK/LONDON (Reuters) – Following are analysts’ comments after President Barack Obama on Monday projected in his budget for the fiscal year to September 30, 2011 the budget deficit would soar to a fresh record of $1.56 trillion in 2010.

LATEST COMMENTS

ANDRE BAKHOS, PRESIDENT, PRINCETON FINANCIAL GROUP, NORTH

BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY

“We’re talking about a record budget with record deficits. In it we have I believe $100 billion stimulus on top of what’s already been approved in the past, and it’s going to be interesting to see how that plays up.

“I don’t believe it’s going to make a (stock) market impact. People are aware of the deficit and the record budget. I don’t think the average investor will trade on the back of that.”

PETER BOOCKVAR, EQUITY STRATEGIST, MILLER TABAK & CO., NEW

YORK:

“I don’t think there is anything out there that is job creating and I don’t have much confidence that some of the spending cuts will actually happen.

“I would rather come in today and focus on fundamental earnings rather than what the government’s budget deficit is going to be. It’s going to be large, it’s going to be big and that’s what’s the most disappointing thing and this doesn’t change that.”

MARC OSTWALD, CURRENCY, RATES STRATEGIST, MONUMENT

SECURITIES, LONDON:

“When the deficit is that size and you want to cut it meaningfully, you have to do more….Continue Reading