Posts Tagged ‘Lame Cherry’

The Marco Rubio Cube of Ambition, Principle, Politics, Duty, Constitution and Moral Relativism – The BOPAC Report

August 31, 2011

The BOPAC Report

 

Worried-Yet The Barack "The Borg" Obama Collective is coming! Resistance is Necessary to Save America from Mediocrity and Less Liberty!

The Marco Rubio Cube of Ambition, Principle, Politics, Duty, Constitution & Moral Relativism

Many decent Americans are beginning to find themselves facing something that if it happens must culminate with a vital but troubling individual action in 2012.  One American in particular, who clearly loves his country, ought to be tied in knots inside by that something. That particular American is Senator Marco Rubio and that something is the possibility that he might be selected as the running mate for the Republican nominee for President of the United States.

Unless one has been living under a rock or getting their news only from the mainstream media, everyone should be aware of the problem Sen. Rubio, through no fault of his, has.  Unfortunately, Sen. Rubio is probably not a Natural Born Citizen as is required by the Constitution to be President or Vice-President.

If I were Sen. Rubio, I would certainly be tied up inside. If he’s not, then that’s a problem.  Had Sen. Rubio never gone to law school, never studied the Constitution, never served as an intern in Congress, or had never taken an Oath to support and defend the Constitution then maybe he could be excused if he’s not conflicted.  However, he has done all of those things and should hold himself to a higher standard.  So if he’s not conflicted, that speaks volumes about his ethics, morals, ambitions and respect for the Constitution and Rule of Law.  Personally, I believe he is conflicted – but has managed to compartmentalize and assuage his doubts and concerns by craftily working the Rubio (Rubik) Cube to arrange and rationalize most of the parts of his world and outward appearances to suit him.  I’m sure the power players will be telling him that everything looks fine; it’s no big deal.

However, one group of cubes that support Senator Rubio cannot be lined up so neatly is that of the millions of Americans who understand that the Constitution has a requirement that the President be a Natural Born Citizen and that there are legitimate questions and issues about what that means.  They understand that the media and both Parties would be satisfied if the Natural Born Citizen requirement would just go away. It’s clear that the players are pulling out all the stops to equate ordinary citizenship to natural born citizenship without going through the Amendment process.  However, most know that to be a natural born citizen requires that both of a candidates’ parents must have been American citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth in the U.S.  But even if the good Senator can manage to make the outward appearance his world look acceptable he should be left with a hodgepodge of internal doubts, conflicts and betrayals lingering to tarnish his possible service. However, there is a solution to Senator Rubio’s cube.

Given that the term Natural Born Citizen was not defined in the Constitution and courts have recognized that jurists must look outside the document to gleam the meaning and intent, there exists legal arguments that can be made urging the Supreme Court to refine the common historical definition of who is a Natural Born Citizen to incorporate situations the Founders may not have considered and that would not undermine the Founders’ concern that the President must have his or her sole allegiance directed to the United States.  Thus the Court would not be changing the definition but merely clarifying it.  It wouldn’t help Gov. Jindal but might help Senator Rubio.

The situation is the special case of the United States’ involvement and responsibilities to the people of Cuba in the early 20th century.  

Lame Cherry argues on her blog:

…Marco Rubio’s parents … Mario was born in 1927 and Oria born in 1931 were fully under the US protectorate status as much as Barack Hussein Obama sr. was under British Mandate status making him British.

This was further cemented in President Fulgencio Batista joining the allies in World War II in declaring war on Japan and Germany in December 1941 with Cubans fighting in concert with Americans in that global conflict.

The Rubios are not some post Castro globalists. The Rubios willingly came to America when afforded the opportunity…

Whether or not the Supreme Court would chose to interpret the term Natural Born Citizen to include the special situation of parents born under United States protection and clearly having no loyalty to the current dictatorship of Cuba is not the issue for Sen. Rubio.   The real issue is will Sen. Rubio respect the concerns of millions of Americans who are concerned that the Constitution is being treated as an impediment to the ambitions of politicians?  Will he seek a declaratory judgment from a federal court that indicates that Sen. Marco Rubio is indeed a Natural Born Citizen?

We understand that the Democratic candidate, Mr. Obama, will and has used every resource available to him remain in the Oval Office.  He has been described as a moral relativist; and as such, can justify or rationalize just about anything he does. One could justify everything from drone attacks, targeted assassination, infidelity, hiding school records and even Larry Sinclair’s allegations.

We understand that about Obama; but we do not want our candidate to be one whose life is based on lies, deception, and rationalizations.  We want someone we can be proud of.  Sen. Rubio can be that person if he squares his shoulders and faces the problem and doesn’t rely on Obama’s groundwork of deception.  He might just find a court in a mood to dispense justice and clearly define the term.

Not only does Sen. Rubio have this personal ethical problem to deal with, he is creating a serious ethical/moral conflict in each and every one who believes in their duty to honor the Constitution, especially when they go into the voting booth.  And it is not fair for the Senator to put his problem upon each of us.

If he does, then each one of us will have to examine our own ethics (always advisable), look at the consequences of another Obama term to further degrade America, consider the consequences to the Constitution of another 4 years of constant undermining, consider the lessons we are teaching our children and then try to rationalize our way into pulling the voting lever.  Many of us want to pull the lever for Senator Rubio but it would be nice not to need a shower afterwards.

Moral relativism is basically the idea that there’s no ‘real’ right and wrong; it’s culturally taught behavior; it’s situational ethics; it’s the context of ethical decisions; it’s outcome focused; it’s okay if I say it’s okay.  It’s relative. It’s BS.  If one knows something is wrong and they need to rationalize their action because they really want to do it, it degrades their principles and society in general.   It’s the mores that give rise to unsustainable entitlements and dependency. It’s desensitization to ethical and unethical conduct.  It’s the rioting mobs in Great Britain – it’s Donald Young’s murder – it’s the Jihad mentality and those obvious to it, and in the extreme it’s the fertile ground that gave rise to the holocaust and Rwanda. It leads to decay of both persons and societies.

Rationalization and consideration of the relative badness of outcomes may be necessary sometimes in situations such as war to protect others and their freedoms, in defense of one’s life, etc. but it should make one upset.  It’s supposed to do that. Unfortunately, many today treat morality and ethics as a game – the ME game. It may be a game but it is not without real victims.  Ask the spouse of an unfaithful partner or someone wrongfully imprisoned or the Chinese mother who finds out she’s pregnant with her second child.

Former Candidate Alan Keyes summed it up nicely in a recent article:

…I imagine such relativism works out pretty well for some folks. It always has. After all, moral relativism is simply the self-righteousness of the wicked masquerading as profound intellectual insight…

I don’t want to be forced to be working on ethics Rubik cube in the voting booth. I for one do not want to vote for someone who would intentionally cause me to have to rationalize my vote, twisting my principles upside down, compromising my ethics, undermining the Constitution, degrading my vote.

But given what’s at stake should Obama win – I probably will.

I will then take a shower and hope someone has the resources to file suit in an effort to defend the Constitution.

END

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Albert Einstein

Other News:

American Thinker

CitizenWells

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/08/31/tony-rezko-status-hearing-scheduled-september-7-2011-judge-amy-j-st-eve/

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/08/rule-of-law-and-natural-born-citizen.html

Natural Born Citizen

Orly Taitz, Esq.

Philip Berg, Esq.

The Jag Hunter

The Post Email

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/08/30/the-u-s-constitution-what-it-means/

United States Constitution

Great News For Larry Sinclair – He’s Being Sued! – Maybe the Truth will be Established – Man’s Country – Lame Cherry – Lt. Col. Lakin – The BOPAC Report

June 4, 2010

 The BOPAC Report

The Secret Life of O –

Ahmadinejad - One of Many Reasons Why Larry Sinclair's Allegations Matter!

Connections are being made and what at first appeared as a simple matter of secret personal preferences might be growing into some sort of systemic cancerous reflection of many in American politics.  The cancer is secrecy about infidelity and identity.  I could care less what people’s sexual preferences are – but I do care about honesty, security clearances, transparency and the possibility of blackmail regarding members of our government.

From Lame Cherry:

Obama’s Man’s Country
There has been a story circulating around the internet by Wayne Madsen which if true confirms a great deal of the profiling conducted here in the Barack Hussein Obama Chicago sodomite group he was involved in, as it is stated that B. Hussein Obama and Rahm Emanuel both belong to a gay sex shop called Man’s Country.

The fascination I have with this story is not that it confirms research, profiling or provides even more exoneration to Lawrence Sinclair, but that it fills a crucial void in this story of Obama the gayster, as he bounced around the globe from Indonesian adoptee to Pakistani partridge hunter.

No one has asked the question in this yet, if the reason Obama was introduced to the secret handshake crowd which lifted him from gay Columbia University to the Gay Clubs of Chicago, was not about Marxism, black liberation, Muslim mafia money, but instead was about the connected gay community opening doors for one of their own…Continue Reading

Larry Sinclair’s Journey –

Larry Sinclair's story will be told and I'm confident he will be vindicated - The pieces of the story continue to unfold.

Well, finally some good news for Larry Sinclair. He’s being sued!  This is good news because the ultimate defense for defamation is the alleged conduct, etc. is ‘true’.  It’s good news because it is another opportunity for the state run media to cover a story they have been trying so hard to hide.  It’s good news because Larry Sinclair will have another opportunity to review the results of the ‘polygraph’ exam results.  For those who have been following Larry Sinclair’s story, most are aware that the results were not definitive.  It seems that Larry Sinclair passed a computer analysis of the results.  All good news!  I wonder if Larry can subpoena the records of ‘Man’s Country’ to verify recent news stories about Obama and Emanual’s memberships there. That would be great!  Maybe a reward for former lovers to come forward.  I said COME not &*)(!  How about the subpoena for Axelrod. 

I think Larry Sinclair will welcome his day in court.  It’s always been about the TRUTH for most of us following Larry Sinclair’s story.  We have watched how Mr. Sinclair has been vilified and threatened.  It is TIME FOR THE TRUTH!

What do you want to bet that somehow this lawsuit goes away? Some may not want people to have the opportunity to judge for themselves who’s more credible – Larry Sinclair or Obama.

 From Courthouse News:

Obama Accuser Accused

By RYAN ABBOTT 

WASHINGTON (CN) – A political blogger claims a gadfly defamed him with “wild allegations” about colluding with then-Senator Barack Obama’s campaign to hide the murder of a church choir director, cocaine use and gay sex. Daniel Parisi sued Larry Sinclair in Federal Court, and also sued a radio talk show host, Sinclair Publishing, Barnes & Noble, Amazon.com, and Books-a-Million.
     Parisi claims Sinclair published a book in 2009 that accuses him of colluding with Obama’s adviser David Axelrod to rig a polygraph exam that would debunk Sinclair’s story that he had sex and took cocaine with then-Senator Obama.
     Parisi claims that in 2008 Sinclair posted “wild allegations regarding the purchase, sale and use of drugs and sexual activity by and between Sinclair and Obama,” on YouTube. That video was still posted on YouTube this morning (Thursday)….Continue Reading

Lt. Col. Lakin’s Journey –

I'm Sure There Are Many Soldiers Living This Nightmare. It's Time For The Joint Chiefs of Staff to Step To The Plate and Support Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin! Don't Be Military Sheep.

Unfortunately but not unexpectedly, Lt. Col. Lakin’s journey is going to be a difficult one.  The Investigating Officer has said he will not consider evidence of Obama’s ineligibility. This means that Lt. Col. Lakin will not be able to obtain a fair trial if such evidence is not allowed to be presented at his Courts Martial. Certainly an issue for appeal, but given that those with power have added a few extra wardrobe accessories to go with Lady Justice’s blindfold – ear plugs, a sock in her mouth, shackles on her feet, and handcuffs – it will be steep climb.  Those in the DC area should note that the Art. 32 hearing is open to public – bring video cameras.

 

And Obama continues to hide documentation that every other President has allowed to be made public.  This courageous Officer is risking his career and liberty to live up to the Oath he took and Obama sits on his hands

 

From World Net Daily:

 

Army slams door on Obama details

Lt. Col. Lakin hearing: ‘Items pertaining to president’s credentials are not relevant’

Posted: June 03, 2010
4:06 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

An Army “investigating officer” has banished evidence about the controversy over President Obama’s eligibility – or lack thereof – to be commander-in-chief from a pending hearing for a career military doctor who announced he is refusing orders until Obama documents his constitutional status.

“In my view our constitutional jurisprudence allows Congress alone, and not a military judicial body, to put the president’s credentials on trial,” wrote Daniel J. Driscoll in a memorandum determining what evidence the defense for Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin will be allowed to explore at next week’s hearing.

“It is my opinion the discovery items pertaining to the president’s credentials are not relevant to the proof of any element of the charges and specifications set forth in the charge sheet,” he continued. “Consequently I will not examine the documents or witnesses pertinent to the president or his credentials to hold office.”

The ruling came prior to a scheduled Article 32 hearing for Lakin, who posted a video inviting his own court hearing because of the status of the president and questions over whether his eligibility means orders given under his control would be invalid. …Continue Reading

CitizenWells gives another example of how the American Justice system is decaying.  It seems that most people still have a shot at equal justice as long as their cases don’t involve controversial ‘political’ issues that challenge power.  First we learned that what was thought as a fair media was exposed to be nothing more than a tool for those seeking to undermine the Constitution and now we discover that our justice system is in the process of changing the very definition of ‘justice’ to one written in Chicago.  Time will tell just how corrupt our courts have become.

Hollister v Soetoro aka Barack Obama, Update, June 3, 2010, Motion for recusal of Judge Robertson, Attorney John D. Hemenway motion

June 3, 2010

Hollister v Soetoro aka Barack Obama, Update, June 3, 2010, Motion for recusal

From Attorney John D. Hemenway.

“On behalf of Colonel Gregory Hollister, et al, Attorney John D. Hemenway filed a “Motion for Recusal” in the Colonel Gregory Hollister, et al, v. Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama, et al, lawsuit now pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The Judge in question is Judge Robertson who ruled the issue of “the President’s citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and was otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry…,” among numerous other bias statements. Atty Hemenway cites numerous cases including a SCOTUS case regarding bias and the recusal of Judges. The Motion for Recusal embedded below the snippet speaks for itself and is well worth the time to read.

This is the same Judge that ruled that Jihadists at Gitmo are entitled to the same benefits as our Troops….Continue Reading

 Brothers and Sisters in the Military – When are you going to demand Obama establish that he is a Natural Born Citizen, eligible to serve as Commander In Chief?  Don’t be OBamboozled!

If your Oath to protect the Constitution is not important today, why don’t we just change the military oath of allegiance to reflect our current level of commitment? 

I, _______, do solemnly swear to protect ME and I will try to defend the Constitution as long as it doesn’t adversely impact the aforementioned ‘ME’.

 

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Albert Einstein

 

Other  News –

Prime Minister Netanyahu, you have millions of American's behind you. Ignore Obama's theatrics and protect Israel!

From CitizenWells:

Blagojevich trial day 2, June 4, 2010, Jury selection, Judge James Zagel, Prosecutors and defense attorneys question jurors, Open thread

June 4, 2010

The Universal United Church of OBamboozle! State Run Media Always Welcome! Every Secret Well Kept! Kal Penn, Larry Sinclair, not a Natural Born Citizen, Bill Ayers, Reggie, etc., etc., etc.