Posts Tagged ‘Hannity’

Obama is Eligible to Serve and ‘Birthers’ are Vindicated? – The BOPAC Report

February 9, 2010

The BOPAC Report:

Obama is Eligible to Serve and ‘Birthers’ are Vindicated? 

Two days ago I read an American Thinker article that challenged my current thinking. The result – I may have to acknowledge the possibility that Obama is a ‘natural born citizen’ and therefore eligible to serve as President.  If either possibility presented in the article proves true and a few loose ends are tied up concerning Obama’s mother, I will be forced to stop referring to Obama as Obama and begin referring to him as President Obama.  Time will tell if ‘facts’ come out that beckon such a change.  Jack Cashill’s presentation is very compelling, but will journalists and historians use their gravitas to drive the final nails in the eligibility issue coffin?

I do so want to turn away from the eligibility issue temporarily and focus on the cliff Obama is taking America over. Did you see that a majority of Democrats have a favorable view of Socialism?  That’s going to be a main focus of the 2010 battle for Independents because spending, taxing, personal responsibility, voter dependency, federal debt, job creation, technological innovation and the role of government are all intimately intertwined with it. The reality is that November is fast approaching and every effort needs to be made to stop Obama’s socialist objectives.

But, because Presidential eligibility is such a bedrock issue, it’s almost impossible for those of us who care deeply about the Constitution and the rule of law to turn away based solely upon political calculations.  Something has to be added to the calculation to tip the scales. If real journalists could find documentation verifying Mr. Cashill’s suppositions, I’m sure most of us challenging Obama’s eligibility would fall away satisfied because there would in fact be a there there.

As much as it has been denied and misconstrued, determining the ‘truth’ has always been the objective regarding the ‘eligibility’ question for the vast majority of those trying to look behind the Obama curtain.  The media can name call and ridicule each and every one who has questioned Obama’s eligibility to serve as President. (‘We’ certainly didn’t choose the moniker ‘birther’.) They can maliciously imply that each and every question we raise involves some race-based angst or worse. They can manipulate public opinion. They can even shape the public’s understanding of the Constitutional requirements for the Presidency. It’s not right, it’s not true, it’s not journalism – but they can do it.  What they can’t do is rewrite history to say there wasn’t (isn’t) a ‘there, there’ regarding Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States.  What exactly the ‘there’ is hasn’t been discovered.  Obama knows – but he’s not cooperating.

Let’s be honest, don’t you think objective legal historians/researchers looking at the facts, the circumstantial evidence, the testimony of his grandmother, the news reports from years earlier, the actions of Obama (withholding documents from the public, spending vast sums in legal fees, etc.), the ‘founders’ understanding of the term ‘natural born citizen’, the reasons for the Constitutional provision, the actual limitations of what can be proven from Obama’s online ‘Hawaiian birth certificate’, the lack of on point court decisions talking about the term ‘natural born citizen’, the differences in meanings for the terms ‘citizen’ and ‘natural born citizen’, etc., etc. – would realize that it’s almost a certainty that legitimate issues of some type exist?  It may take historians many years to acquire the documentation that will vindicate the ‘birthers’.  But rest assured, this issue is important enough that some historian will continue to pay attention.  I wonder if a book is being out-lined at this very moment, maybe a few law review articles?

But seriously, looking at the big picture, is the status quo really the best situation for Obama?

Everyone knows that there’s a huge secret being kept. You know it. I know it. Orly Taitz knows it. Larry Sinclair knows it. Ahmadinejad knows it. Netanyahu knows it. Hu Jintao knows it. It’s like your driving on the interstate; you see a car pulled over with a police car on its bumper, lights flashing. As you drive past, you see one passenger toss something in the bushes when the State Trooper approaches the driver.  You don’t know exactly what’s up but you know something is.

Right now the situation is that a substantial number of Americans cannot ethically recognize Obama as President. How can that be good for America? How can that be good for the military?  Given that Obama has done nothing except post a document of limited evidentiary value online, how can anyone expect the concerns of Americans to be allayed? 

The reason Obama is fighting this so hard, spending so much, is because he knows the outcome is a crapshoot.  Taking the facts in a light most favorable to Obama, it still requires the judge(s) to find that Obama was born in Hawaii and that the meaning of the term ‘natural born citizen’ is either American citizenship equals ‘natural born citizenship’ or being a ‘natural born citizen’ requires only one of Obama’s parents to be an American citizen by birth or naturalization at the time of Obama’s birth.

Such an interpretation by the courts would necessarily require activist judges who believe that the Constitution is a living breathing document that changes with the times. Fortunately, the American justice system is not there yet because that would make the Constitution subject to the political whims of judges and politicians. Nevertheless, if such a decision did occur most Americans would live with the result. 

Additionally, such a decision outcome would vindicate the ‘birthers’ because the Constitution had to be stretched beyond its original meaning and that would be the ‘there’.  It would give Obama what he wants.  But, it would be the crapshoot of his life!

The other factual possibility that could establish Obama as a ‘natural born citizen’ brings us back to the American Thinker article – the existence of a secret so big that it jumps right over the inconvenient problems arising from the citizenship of Barack Obama, Sr.

The nice thing about this possibility is that (for me) it explains a lot if true and it vindicates the ‘birthers’.  And to top it off, it follows the principle of Occam’s razor.

… When competing hypotheses are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selection of the hypothesis that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities while still sufficiently answering the question.…

It acknowledges the common sense desire a parent would have to make sure baby Obama has American citizenship and family legitimacy. It also recognizes that a parent would not have been worried about making sure Obama was a ‘natural born citizen’ because it is not realistic to think that a particular child will grow up to be President.

It makes it possible to imagine how and why the CIA and FBI appear to be covering for Obama.

It partly explains why Hillary Clinton, John McCain and the Republican Party didn’t raise the issue. What politician would risk raising such a possibility without absolute proof? (Gov. Jindal’s situation may have factored in for Republicans and for far left Democrats- effectively eviscerating one more parts of the Constitution is a progressive’s dream.)

It exposes how judges might have been persuaded to do a kabuki dance to avoid getting to the merits of eligibility cases and being forced to make the choice of wrongly expanding the meaning of ‘natural born citizen’ to avoid rioting in the streets or expose a huge secret.

It also partly explains why Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Hannity are being so reluctant to fully address the issue.  However, if the possibility of an election-changing secret is true and Glenn Beck did not reveal it, did Mr. Beck aid the Progressives in gutting the meaning and force of Article 1, Section II of the Constitution?

It explains why the media is going so far out of their way to misdirect and vilify those asking questions. (Not they needed a lot of arm-twisting to go – given their coverage of John Edward’s affair/love child and Larry Sinclair’s allegations of cocaine use and sex with Obama in 1999.)

And finally, it vindicates the much-maligned ‘birthers’ because there is a there there.  Either Obama is not a ‘natural born citizen’ and is not eligible to serve as President or Obama is a ‘natural born citizen’ and every other part of his life is a ‘natural born lie’/deception.  (As more and more Americans are discovering.)

Regardless of outcome, ‘birthers’ will be vindicated. 

Notwithstanding ‘birther’ vindication, it remains essential that we know the truth because though the actions and non-actions of the media, courts, talk-radio, and politicians – Article I, Section II of the Constitution has been weakened (eviscerated) for future elections unless individual States require Presidential Candidates to present proof of theirs and their parents’ citizenship.

Sorry, I haven’t given specific details about the American Thinker article’s revelations. To briefly mention the actual details doesn’t do justice, given that Jack Cashill has done such a nice job of laying it out.  It’s a must read.

______________________

NOTE:

Thank you for considering this article!

I think the next phase has to be turning to State Legislatures to require proof of eligibility. Such legislation may stop Obama from attempting another run for which he may well not be eligible and protect Article II, Section 1.

…Notwithstanding ‘birther’ vindication, it remains essential that we know the truth because though the actions and non-actions of the media, courts, talk-radio, and politicians – Article I, Section II of the Constitution has been weakened (eviscerated) for future elections unless individual States require Presidential Candidates to present proof of theirs and their parents’ citizenship….

Hopefully some of you will write your State legislators. Feel free to copy any article on my blog if it can aid in your efforts.

Stress the need for 3 birth certificates. One from the candidate and 2 from parents (or proof of naturalization)! Candidate’s parents have to have been US citizens at the time of his or her birth.

Thank you for your time and efforts.

Navy Seals Prosecution: Victory for Terrorists – USNavySeals – Copenhagen Report Card – Telegraph – US Military Force Must Be Option With Iran – Dream On – Iran Bans Reformist Daily (Pay Attention Rush Limbaugh) – The BOPAC Report

December 21, 2009

The BOPAC Report

Navy Seals Prosecution –

Loyalty is Required in the Obama Cult! Navy Seals surely won't change their oath! It will be a cold day in hell before Gov. Palin gets one.

I think about our Navy Seals being persecuted by the Obama Administration everyday and it makes me question why anyone would put him or herself in such danger knowing Obama and the Chain of Command do not have their backs.  Not only do they not have their backs, the Obama Chain of Command appears to be intentionally putting roadblock after roadblock in the way of these dedicated Americans (Seals, CIA, FBI, Military). 

How long will America’s best be willing to endure such treatment at the hands of Obama?

From USNavySeals.com:

Charging of Navy SEALs: A Victory for Terrorists

Posted December 21st, 2009 by USNavySeals

The charging of the three Navy SEALs is a small win for terrorism. For all we know, there may be terrorists who are secretly laughing their head off over the fact that the military is sanctioning their men by the word of a terrorist who may have murdered and mutilated American citizens. If the tables had been turned and it was an American who suddenly fell into the hands of a terrorist group, would he have been accorded the same “courtesy”?

This is probably the very reason why Lesson 18 of the Al Qaeda manual specifically states that “brothers” should complain about being maltreated in prison. These people have already read through the American psyche it seems, and expected this very reaction. What we may have done here by proceeding with having these Navy SEALs brought to court-martial – after undoubtedly going through hell and high water simply to get this guy alive – is prove all the more that what these terrorists have written in their manual actually works. They were right, after all….Continue Reading

Climate Change & Climate Gate –

 

Climate Rascals - Climategate - Al Gore is pulling "science" out of his butt.

Copenhagen climate summit: report card How the Copenhagen Climate Accord measures up.

By Louise Gray, Environment correspondent in Copenhagen
Published: 8:00AM GMT 21 Dec 2009

Global warming: The Accord agrees that global temperature rise should stay below 2C (3.6F). A tangible acheivement but less ambitious than some would have hoped. 5/10

Reducing greenhouse gases: The treaty did not include any numerical targets for cutting pollution. 0/10 …

Overall: The Copenhagen Accord is merely a UN decision that has no legal standing and there is no timetable to turn it into a proper treaty. 1/10

Read Complete Article

Ji’Bama’had –

 

Hillary's 3am Call vis-a-vis the Omnipresent Teleprompter to Obama!

A U.S. military option against Iran? With Obama? Dream on!

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad completely understands that Obama is not going to do anything militarily to stop development of nuclear weapons.  Ahmadinejad has watched Obama persecute America’s CIA for not serving cookies when interrogating terrorists and the Navy Seals for possibly giving a major terrorist a fat lip.  I’m sure all of America’s enemies are rolling on the floor laughing and wondering who’s side Obama is on.

No one seriously believes that Obama’s Socialist America would do anything to help Israel survive the coming storm of a nuclear Iran.

Top US officer: Force must be option for Iran

By ANNE GEARAN (AP) –

WASHINGTON — Military force would have only limited effect in stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons but must remain an option, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Monday.

Baghdad shows no signs of backing down in the standoff over what the United States and other countries say is its drive for a nuclear bomb, Adm. Mike Mullen, the top U.S. military officer, told his staff in an annual assessment of the nation’s risks and priorities.

“My belief remains that political means are the best tools to attain regional security and that military force will have limited results,” Mullen wrote. “However, should the president call for military options, we must have them ready.”…Continue Reading

Obama Run Media –

 

Net Neutrality's Goal is State Controlled Media and Information

America Needs a Fair and Objective Media! Climategate, Navy-Seal-Gate, Larry Sinclair Gate - bias is everywhere.

I hope Fox, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, Hannity and everyone else giving views that are in opposition to Obama take notice of what is happening in Iran.  It’s coming to America soon if Obama has his way!  Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Castro and Obama are peas in a pod united in the knowledge that a “free press” cannot be tolerated if people are to be kept in the dark and fed crap.  You can’t have prime rib available if all you give people is crap.  They will eventually rebel.

Iran bans another reformist daily, warned reformist news agency Posted on : 2009-12-21 | Author : dpa
News Category : Middle East

Tehran – An Iranian press watchdog on Monday banned another reformist Tehran daily and warned the reformist news agency ILNA against reporting about opposition groups and their activities. The ISNA news agency reported that the daily Andisheh’e No (New Thought) was banned “for working outside the regulations of press law.” No further details were given.

The reformist Tehran daily, Hayat’e No (New Life), was closed down earlier this month on the same charges.

ISNA further reported that the labour news agency ILNA, which is close to the opposition, was warned by the Culture Ministry, in charge of local and foreign press, not to report about opposition groups in general and the Green Movement in particular. …Continue Reading

Obama Protocol Office Ticks Off Norwegians – Guardian – Obama Planning Big Bow at Copenhagen – Sovereign Debt Problems – Jobless Claims Rise – CitizenWells has a Question for Rush Limbaugh – The BOPAC Report

December 10, 2009

The BOPAC Report

ObamaNomics –

 

Obamanomics - It's a Crap Shoot! Sovereign Debt Worries, Cap and Trade, & Healthcare Colliding to Sink America!

No place to hide.  It’s been an interesting week in the world of economics with Greece and Spain having their sovereign credit ratings downgraded.  This comes on the heels of the United States and Britain being warned that their deficits put them in jeopardy of having their rating downgraded soon.

The news of Spain and Greece’s troubles did help to prop-up the dollar while the world decides where is it safe to put their money.  Just to let everyone know, there’s no place to hide.   When bond yields rise, stocks generally have pressure to rise because of the understanding that the U.S. will soon not be able to pay even the interest on its debt.  The thinking must be that it’s better to own part of real companies rather than invest in U.S. treasuries.

A rise in stocks on a falling dollar can also be because businesses exporting can reap the benefits in terms of overseas sales.  However, this kind of rise can only have a short-term bump because the falling dollars makes everything more expensive for Americans who are already struggling.

Wheelers and dealers are buying and selling on profit potentials today and not thinking about tomorrow. 

The dollar is stable only for the short term as the fundamentals are horrible and unsustainable.  And what is the Obama Administration and Democrats doing?  They are throwing gas on the fire by proposing even more unsustainable debt in the form of a socialist healthcare system and planning even more disincentives for business create jobs through taxes via Cap & Trade, healthcare, and the TARP political slush fund. 

Stocks are not necessarily going to be a safe haven if Cap and Tax & Healthcare go through.  The proposed Democrat Healthcare is being crafted for political reasons to drive private insurance companies out of business and create a dependent voting block.  This is going to further harm the economy by throwing millions more unemployed in the system putting greater pressure for downgrading the U.S. credit rating because of less tax revenue and greater spending on unemployment expenses.  How many more unemployed will be created by Cap and Tax drive coal reliant businesses under? 

The increased unemployment will create more mortgage foreclosures that will impact stock values via financials investments.  Car sales will be inhibited because there will be no ability for millions to obtain or pay for credit.  Millions of people will only be able to afford clunkers – forget about being able to afford hybrids.

Raising taxes on those who create jobs will either cause greater unemployment or the increases will be passed on to consumers who will be put even further behind the eight ball.  Many possible employers may get a belly full of Obama’s involvement in business and just throw their hands up and retire.

I fear this can only spiral out of control.  Gold and property (if local governments don’t over tax it) may be the only places for any security. This makes the 2010 elections critical to show the world that we are serious about getting a handle on our debt and returning to a strong dollar.

From the WSJ:

Sovereign Debt Is the Next Big Worry DECEMBER 9, 2009, 4:21 P.M. ET

By MICHAEL CASEY

NEW YORK — If you’re looking for one global risk to really worry about, look no further than the mountain of debt accumulated by governments in their efforts to support domestic economies.

Moody’s Investors Service says there’s $49.5 trillion of sovereign debt outstanding — and this week, ratings firms, and some jumpy bond traders, have shone a glaring light on it.

The raters are worried that governments’ massive deficit-spending campaigns to pull their economies out of last year’s crisis won’t produce enough economic growth to pay for itself.

But none of this is new. A month ago, the International Monetary Fund projected that the average debt-to-gross domestic product ratio of the 10 advanced country members of the Group of 20 developing and developed nations would mushroom to 118% by 2014. Such numbers have led some pundits to warn of a debt crisis, especially regarding the U.S.’s dependence on foreign creditors.

What’s key now is that the recent market jitters could be self-fulfilling. Falling bond prices mean higher yields, which makes it harder for governments to refinance future obligations. That will hurt the currencies of those nations and will challenge fixed exchange rate regimes — especially in the euro zone and for currencies pegged to the dollar.

Spain became the latest flashpoint Wednesday when Standard Poor’s changed the outlook on its AA+ rating to negative. As it did when it downgraded Portugal’s outlook Monday, S&P emphasized a weak growth outlook.

And with their bonds hammered for different reasons, Greece and Dubai’s and Abu Dhabi’s government-controlled entities have similarly seen ratings or outlook downgrades this week.

Also on Tuesday, Moody’s acknowledged two elephants in the room. Although it referred to worst-case scenarios, the agency said the U.S. and the U.K.– whose public debt runs to $12.1 trillion and $1.3 trillion, respectively–could potentially lose their triple-A ratings. …Continue Reading

What was I just saying about a momentary strength of the dollar?

Dollar turns down after jobless claims rise

By Deborah Levine

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — The dollar came under slight pressure versus major rivals on Thursday after the U.S. Labor Department said jobless claims unexpectedly rose by 17,000 in the latest week to 474,000….Continue Reading

 

Obama Protocol Office News –

 

Teleprompter holds Whitehouse Protocol Classes. Obama preparing for Copenhagen bow!

It seems the Obama protocol office has failed again.  I believe they are going to quickly explain this blunder.  Obama had to go early to practice his big bow before most of the world’s leaders in Copenhagen.

Nobel peace prize: Norwegians incensed over Barack Obama’s snubs

guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 9 December 2009 20.00 GMT

Barack Obama‘s trip to Oslo to pick up his Nobel peace award is in danger of being overshadowed by a row over the cancellation of a series of events normally attended by the prizewinner.

Norwegians are incensed over what they view as his shabby response to the prize by cutting short his visit.

The White House has cancelled many of the events peace prize laureates traditionally submit to, including a dinner with the Norwegian Nobel committee, a press conference, a television interview, appearances at a children’s event promoting peace and a music concert, as well as a visit to an exhibition in his honour at the Nobel peace centre.

He has also turned down a lunch invitation from the King of Norway.

According to a poll published by the daily tabloid VG, 44% of Norwegians believe it was rude of Obama to cancel his scheduled lunch with King Harald, with only 34% saying they believe it was acceptable….Continue Reading

Natural Born Citizen Issue

Just like Obama is not Malcolm X - Obama is not a "Natural Born Citizen"! Obama may look like Malcolm X and Obama may be a "Citizen"; but being a "Citizen" does not necessarily mean that Obama is a "Natural Born Citizen"! CitizenWells has a Question for Rush Limbaugh!

CitizenWells has a question for Rush Limbaugh today!

Rush Limbaugh, Simple question, Citizen Wells challenge, Obama birth certificate, US Constitution, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, Birth certificate fair question, Obama attorneys, Why Obama avoids

December 10, 2009

Sarah Palin, Alaska Governor, Vice Presidential Candidate, author and rookie journalist said that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a fair question.

“Palin Says Obama Birth certificate is Fair Question”
“Sarah Palin on the Rusty Humphreis Show discussing Obama’s birth certificate. She argues that just as she showed trigs birth certificate Obama should have to show his.”….

….

To: Rush Limbaugh

From: Citizen Wells
We are not asking you to delve deep into legal matters, into court cases, into legal precedents or definitions. We are simply asking you to ask the question that a fifth grader could ask and answer.

 
The question is why?

“1. Barack Obama has employed a legion of private and government attorneys to prevent revealing his country of birth. Innocent and eligible persons seeking the office of president do not do that.”

Read Complete Article and View Videos Here

Serenity Prayers for Sen. Obama, The Media, & Larry Sinclair

July 8, 2008

Suggested Prayers From a Concerned Citizen

Obama’s Prayer

Lord grant Senator Obama the serenity to accept his embrace of the controversial people from his past and the things he’s done that convey culpability from his past for which he has tried so hard to hide or brush aside;

The courage to take responsibility for the implicit approval all such people and their ideas, as was demonstrated through the affirmative step of seeking to create relationships which would stand the test of time and for such acts, if true, upon review by any reasonable person would impart a sense of criminal conduct;

And the wisdom to know the difference between owning up and covering up.

Larry Sinclair’s Prayer

Lord grant Larry Sinclair the serenity to accept his past culpable behavior and his stated objective to present his story to the American public so that the every person will have complete information concerning his allegations against Senator Obama, and then leaving it to each person to decide what and who they choose to believe;

The courage to tell the complete truth, whatever it may be, including those things that raise questions concerning Mr. Sinclair’s own credibility, the courage to withstand the vicious attacks that he and his family have already endured and surely will continue to endure, especially if the Media and Senator Obama can prove the allegations that Mr. Sinclair and the Senator engaged in the use of crack cocaine and gay sex in 1999 are not true;

And the wisdom to know when all of this ceases to be worth the pain and torture which he and his family have been put through to date – and probably will be put through in the weeks and months to come.

The Main Stream Media’s Prayer

Lord grant the Media the serenity to accept their bias that has permeated their reporting during this election and their susceptibility to pressure from the networks, leftist political forces and politicians that have caused them not to report legitimate issues or to report such issues in a light most favorable to said politicians and networks;

The courage to overcome and publicly admit their bias and susceptibilities to political pressures to the public; and to, from this point forward to live up to their responsibilities to investigate and hold all politicians accountable for their past culpable actions and past relationships that might impact each and every politician’s credibility, reliability, honesty, capability, and suitability for the Office of the Presidency in a fair and objective manner;

And the wisdom to know the difference between “Investigative Journalism” and “Sucking Hind Tit” in regards to the Truth and their professional responsibilities.

From me, I hope each of you say your prayers tonight.

Zach

Will Our Children Be Able To Trust What “History” Says About Senator Obama?

July 6, 2008

Will Our Children Be Able

To Trust

What “History” Says

About Senator Obama?

(If It Draws From Our Media’s Representations of His Life,

How Can Any “History” be Trusted?)

If History comes from the tales of a love sick school girl (or boy), is it safe to say that we should question the portrayal? If History comes from a news commentator, who gets a tingle running up his leg when he hears Sen. Obama speak, should we question his portrayal? I hope so. If 90% of the media seems to be looking at Sen. Obama’s life through rose colored glasses, will History be likely to paint an accurate depiction of today’s reality?

We each have to answer that question.

This is such an important election, ground breaking to be sure. Surely we all want information and assertions that could legitimately impact a voter’s decision making process to be presented in a fair and impartial manner.

Doesn’t that include those stories and allegations that are trying to break through to the public’s awareness, that circulate on the internet, which have more than a remote possibility of being true?

Isn’t it the duty of the press to investigate thoroughly and report their findings as to the allegations validity?

Isn’t it?

Have we ever been able to trust History? Or is the realm of this mistrust confined to today because of the glaring failings of our media to do their jobs?

Larry Sinclair’s allegations that he and Sen. Obama used crack cocaine and engaged in gay sex falls within the purview of an allegation that has more than a remote possibility of being true. Especially, when one considers how many people Sen. Obama has thrown under the bus and explained it as (he, she, it) was not the person I knew.

Martin Luther King, Jr., a man I admire greatly, once said:

We are not makers of history. We are made by history.

And therefore, I have to ask this question:

What if the History we are made by is not accurate?

What if that inaccuracy is due to the media’s own diminution of their role because they agree with Vladimir Lenin.

Sometimes – history needs a push.
Vladimir Lenin

Scary, don’t you think?

Obama’s “I Have a Dream” Speech Rough Draft Found In Caffe Latte Establishment!!!

July 5, 2008

Newly Discovered

First Draft of

Senator Obama’s Version

of

I Have a Dream Speech

(or Is It Our Nightmare?)

Let us not wallow in the back of a limo with Mr. Larry Sinclair too much valley of despair, I say to you today, my friends.

And so even though we I face hide the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream dream of change. It is a dream deeply rooted in the Marxist dream American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will lay down rise up and live out the true meaning of its My creed: “We I hold these truths to be self-evident, that all liberal elitists men are better than all others. created equal.”

I have a dream that one day in a gated community in Chicago on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former Pentagon bombers slaves and the sons of former Obama donor Tony Rezko slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of my Reverend Jeremiah Wright brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the land of my birth, Kenya state of Mississippi, a state country sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of American tax payer aid freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my two four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the dishonesty of their father color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I have a dream for November 7, 2008 today!

I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious clingers of guns and religion racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of “interposition” and “nullification” — one day right there in Alabama little liberal elitist boys black boys and liberal elitist black girls will be able to join hands with little inferior working class white boys and inferior working class white girls as their slower step-sisters and brothers.

I have a dream for November 7, 2008 today!

I have a dream that one day Larry Sinclair’s limo will be hidden forever every valley shall be exalted, and every opposition blog and website shall be silenced hill and mountain shall be made low,the ,my former alleged crack dealers will stay hidden by the media rough places will be made plain, and the all down-low men shall be exalted and protected from their wives crooked places will be made straight; “and the glory of the Me Lord shall be revealed and all male flesh shall see me as available. it together.

This is our my hope, and this is the essence of me faith that I will keep concealed from all voters. go back to the South with.

With this a manufactured portrayal of me faith, I we will be able to hew out of the country’s mountain of despair a thrown stone of hope. With this manufactured portrayal of me faith, I we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of for me brotherhood. With this manufactured portrayal of me faith, you we will be able to work together, to pay higher taxes pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together for speaking against me, to stand up for socialism freedom together, knowing that I we will be your messiah free one day.

And this will be the day — this will be the day when all of God’s children will be able to sing with new meaning:

My country ’tis not free of thee, no sweet land of liberty, of thee I scream sing.

Land where my fathers died, land of the liberal’s Pilgrim’s pride,

From every mountainside, let my hand reign freedom ring!

And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true.

And so let my hand reign freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire.

Let my hand reign freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York.

Let my hand reign freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania.

Let my hand reign freedom ring from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado.

Let my hand reign freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California.

But not only that:

Let my hand reign freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia.

Let my hand reign freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee.

Let my hand reign freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi.

From every mountainside, let my hand reign freedom ring.

And when this happens, when we allow my hands’ reign freedom ring, when we let it reign ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of my father’s God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the new liberal old Negro spiritual:

Me Free at last! Me Free at last!

Thank Obama God Almighty, We’re Me we are free at last!

This document was reported to have been found near a table in a Caffe Latte Establishment.

Most likely is Satire.

Anyone who isn’t confused really doesn’t understand the situation.
Edward R. Murrow

Senator Obama’s Patriotism – a Veteran’s Perspective

July 1, 2008


Patriotism is the cloak we wear to announce our love of country and our bond to our neighbors. It reflects our commitment to each other and to the ideas upon which this country was founded. It is that which trumpets the chorus “We Stand Together.” The threads are our highest and noblest principles and they remind us to be vigilant in regard to their protection, lest they become bare, frayed, distorted and lose their luster. It is not blind obedience, but is thoughtful and reflective. It is that of a caretaker. Mindfully practiced, it can shape the essence of the individual and thus be reflected in our society. It is a simple thing and is profound in its potential.

It is also a simple and profound thing that occurs when it is neglected, distorted, or diminished. We lose the We. The We becomes strangers who have forgotten what price has been paid in blood for our individual Freedoms and Obligations. The We becomes we who are less committed and connected to our neighbors and common values. When the cloak is removed, it is harder to recognize from a distance what principles are within the heart, what they are striving for.

Patriotism is not a dangerous word when it is grounded in precious truths that we have to aspire to and frequently fall short of. It is not a dangerous word when it is practiced sincerely, inclusively and humbly. It is the journey of a group that wants the Nation to radiate warmth and love. It is why individuals have the courage to stand up to the government when the nation’s principles seem to be lost or off tract. Because the principles mean something, many hearts weep when the next generation appears to have forgotten or never were taught about the journey, the price. Freedom is not free and there are those that would take it away.

Just as Senator Obama said in February during this election cycle, “Don’t tell me words don’t matter. ‘I have a dream.’ Just words? ‘We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal.’ Just words? ‘We have nothing to fear but fear itself.’ Just words? Just speeches?” I agree with the Senator that words do matter.

I would also add, “Don’t tell me that symbols don’t matter. Putting your hand over your heart when saying the Pledge. Just a symbol. Treating the Flag with reverence. Just a symbol. Wearing a Flag lapel pin. Just a symbol. And guess what, – symbols matter. It should matter even more for the representatives of our government. It is a part of being mindful about our freedom. It is part of showing the next generation that these ideals are the principles of this Nation. These principles are why our fathers, mothers, sons, daughters are called upon sometimes to risk losing their lives. Symbols matter. They slow the decay of ideas by causing us to remember.

That is why this photo creates in me such distress. Sen. Obama might become President and he doesn’t have a clue about what being Patriotic means. There is a level of arrogance in his actions that slaps everyone who has had to answer the call to arms. I believe he refers to us as the clingers. The clingers to guns and religion whose forefathers founded this great country and in January of 2009 might become his subjects. The Senator seems to only see the negative in America and not its strengths. He must have learned that from his pastor.

“There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured with what is right in America.”
William J. Clinton

NOTE

To Follow the Larry Sinclair story that the media is trying to suppress and for up to date information regarding Mr. Larry Sinclair’s allegations, “Senator Obama and Larry Sinclair engaged in the illegal use of cocaine and engaged in gay sex in 1999”, see links below:

Larry Sinclair’s Blog

CitizenWell’s Blog

Obambi.com Blog

Obama’s Position – Even If You Are Pro-Choice, Should Shock You.

June 30, 2008

Obama’s Callous Indifference

This is from The American Thinker

June 30, 2008

By Peter Kirsanow

Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen declares that Barack Obama is ” ‘likable enough’ — in fact, so much so that he is the most charismatic presidential candidate I have seen since Robert F.Kennedy.” Well, even though I’ve never spoken with Obama, I don’t like him very much (I did testify with him [and a few others] once about a bill he’d sponsored on voter intimidation, but at the time he didn’t impress me as unlikable, just a little intellectually lazy) .
This hasn’t always been the case. Until early February, I tended to agree with all the news stories that contained the obligatory man-in-the-street quotes proclaiming him “decent,” “likeable” and a “nice guy with a beautiful family.” …
Wait a minute. Aren’t we constantly regaled about all of his endearing qualities? He makes people faint and write songs about him. Hardened journalists get tingles up their legs just thinking about him.
Yet certain discrete actions can provide instant insights into a person’s character. They can betray vivid flaws in a seemingly gleaming persona.
And they compel one to make judgments about the actor.
The acts may vary by degree, in turn prompting different degrees of reaction: the pillar of the community seen pilfering from the collection plate; the co-worker who uses a racial epithet behind a colleague’s back. Indeed, people recoiled from the once popular Michael Vick when they found out he’d abused dogs.
I began to dislike Obama when I discovered that while in the Illinois state legislature in 2002, he voted against the Induced Birth Infant Liability Act. The bill was designed to extend the same medical care to babies who happen to survive an abortion attempt as is enjoyed by all babies born alive.
I couldn’t believe anyone would vote against such a bill. In fact, when a similar measure– the Born Alive Infant Protection Act– was brought before the U.S. Senate, not one Senator voted against it. Even NARAL Pro-Choice America didn’t oppose the bill.
Admittedly, I’m a bit of a curmudgeon. It’s difficult for me to like someone who’s eager to extend a panoply of constitutional rights to terrorists but who refuses to provide the most fundamental rights to a living, breathing infant.
Perhaps it’s a failure to comprehend Obama’s exquisite intellectual nuance. He rationalized his vote in language that evokes Dred Scott. Obama challenged the constitutionality of the bill,contending that conferring equal protection, i.e.,personhood, upon a “pre-viable fetus” would render the bill an unlawful anti-abortion statute.
At what point after birth does Obama call a baby a person and not a fetus? One day? Six months?
To be clear: I don’t hate Obama as those suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome hate President Bush. I just have a hard time generating warm, fuzzy feelings for someone who voted against helping newborns struggling to live. But that’s just me.
I suspect most people don’t know about Obama’s position on babies who survive abortion attempts and it’s unlikely that they’ll ever find out. The media seem more interested in reporting on the cultural implications of fist-bumps or the racial animus of those who question Obama’s policies. I would wager, however, that if more people knew about Obama’s disregard for babies who have the audacity to survive an abortion, there would be more scrutiny and less adulation.
Peter Kirsanow is a member of the U.S.Commission on Civil Rights.These comments do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Commission.

NOTE

To Follow the Larry Sinclair story and for real time live information and up to date information regarding Mr. Larry Sinclair’s allegations, “Senator Obama and Larry Sinclair engaged in the illegal use of cocaine and engaged in gay sex in 1999”, see links below:

Larry Sinclair’s Blog

CitizenWell’s Blog

Obami.com Blog

A Step Towards Respect of Our Laws and The Social Mores by Legalizing Drugs

June 29, 2008

June 29, 2008 by zachjonesishome

(An Approach to Change That Might Lessen Our Tax Burden)

By ZachJonesIsHome

Have you ever asked the question, “Why do so many people bend, break, and/or ignore the law?” I have – and I think it comes down to a pervasive belief (on some level) that many of our laws are not reasonably related to the protection of our society. Many of our laws are intended to restrict decision-making that should be strictly personal in nature. The law caudles us, treats us like children – without the experience to make informed decisions. Instead of developing only laws that address conduct that has the potential of harming others in our society, we develop laws that tell the individual adult that he or she cannot consider a decision they are facing, together with its possible consequences and then choose to live with those consequences.

As stated by George Orwell, On the whole, human beings want to be good, but not too good, and not quite all the time.”

As a result, the consequences (if you will) are that many adults will decide to do the thing they are considering (even if it is illegal) and take the risk. And from that very act, one loses a certain degree of respect for the sanctity of all laws and may become more likely to shrug their shoulders when they see someone else violating some other law(s) that could be construed as an unreasonable infringement on free choice. The individual might also feel the need to cover up his/her indiscretion. (Maybe by lying on applications to licensing boards, lying on tax returns, doing favors of position to others to attempt to cover up, lying to the courts, etc.) Furthermore, it could be argued that it would then become against that person’s best interest to voluntarily help the police by providing information to them regarding other matters – the danger being that if they get involved one might draw more attention than they want. That’s too bad, since the police have historically relied on that type of assistance in its effort to combat crime. And it is always important to remember that children are watching parents violate the law and will learn that they too should be able to pick and choose which laws they are willing to follow….

In conclusion, it is the sanctity of the system of laws that is at issue here. That system can only be respected if it is clearly, rationally related to trying to protect us from harm from others. However, it fails when the system attempts to usurp decisions from us that are clearly ours to make.

So therefore Senator Obama, you can come clean to me about the allegations of your use of illicit drugs and having gay sex with Larry Sinclair in 1999. Just do it. And where is the American media in this? AWOL. Cowards!

Read the complete article here.

NOTE

To Follow this story and for real time live information and up to date information regarding Mr. Larry Sinclair’s allegations, “Senator Obama and Larry Sinclair engaged in the illegal use of cocaine and engaged in gay sex in 1999”, see links below:

Larry Sinclair’s Blog

CitizenWell’s Blog

Obami.com Blog