Archive for the ‘Sex’ Category

A Step Towards Respect of Our Laws and The Social Mores by Legalizing Drugs

June 29, 2008

June 29, 2008 by zachjonesishome

(An Approach to Change That Might Lessen Our Tax Burden)

By ZachJonesIsHome

Have you ever asked the question, “Why do so many people bend, break, and/or ignore the law?” I have – and I think it comes down to a pervasive belief (on some level) that many of our laws are not reasonably related to the protection of our society. Many of our laws are intended to restrict decision-making that should be strictly personal in nature. The law caudles us, treats us like children – without the experience to make informed decisions. Instead of developing only laws that address conduct that has the potential of harming others in our society, we develop laws that tell the individual adult that he or she cannot consider a decision they are facing, together with its possible consequences and then choose to live with those consequences.

As stated by George Orwell, On the whole, human beings want to be good, but not too good, and not quite all the time.”

As a result, the consequences (if you will) are that many adults will decide to do the thing they are considering (even if it is illegal) and take the risk. And from that very act, one loses a certain degree of respect for the sanctity of all laws and may become more likely to shrug their shoulders when they see someone else violating some other law(s) that could be construed as an unreasonable infringement on free choice. The individual might also feel the need to cover up his/her indiscretion. (Maybe by lying on applications to licensing boards, lying on tax returns, doing favors of position to others to attempt to cover up, lying to the courts, etc.) Furthermore, it could be argued that it would then become against that person’s best interest to voluntarily help the police by providing information to them regarding other matters – the danger being that if they get involved one might draw more attention than they want. That’s too bad, since the police have historically relied on that type of assistance in its effort to combat crime. And it is always important to remember that children are watching parents violate the law and will learn that they too should be able to pick and choose which laws they are willing to follow….

In conclusion, it is the sanctity of the system of laws that is at issue here. That system can only be respected if it is clearly, rationally related to trying to protect us from harm from others. However, it fails when the system attempts to usurp decisions from us that are clearly ours to make.

So therefore Senator Obama, you can come clean to me about the allegations of your use of illicit drugs and having gay sex with Larry Sinclair in 1999. Just do it. And where is the American media in this? AWOL. Cowards!

Read the complete article here.

NOTE

To Follow this story and for real time live information and up to date information regarding Mr. Larry Sinclair’s allegations, “Senator Obama and Larry Sinclair engaged in the illegal use of cocaine and engaged in gay sex in 1999”, see links below:

Larry Sinclair’s Blog

CitizenWell’s Blog

Obami.com Blog

When Are The US Attorney and FBI Going To Take Threats Of Murder Seriously, After I am Killed?

June 29, 2008

From Larry Sinclair’s Blog:

Posted by Larry Sinclair on Sunday, June 29, 2008

The DC Office of the FBI and the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia has some explaining to do in regards to this guy threatening me on the day they claim they put an end to his threats.

As with his first Youtube account, he opened the account sent the threat and then closed the account. If the US Attorney for DC and SA Born of the DC FBI do not identify this individual and arrest him then I will take legal action against both offices for the emotional stress they have caused me by my having to deal with repeated death threats from an individual they (the FBI and US Attorney and DC Police) have claimed they contacted after the first threats.

I just happened to log in to my Youtube account and look what I found in my Youtube email box:

Oswaldo12345678

Jun 15, 2008

What happened to Tim Russert could happen to you….

What is the perfect murder? A murder that doesn’t get ruled a murder. Sinclair, there is no amount of security that can protect you from me. Do you really believe the FBI is going to investigate your death threats on Youtube? You really are a delusional little man. Your followers are even more pathetic than you are. I recieved several threats in my PM box shortly after you put my message in your blog. One of your followers even claimed to be an FBI agent. I can only imagine the look on her wrinkled face when I replied, revealing the fact that I know her full name. I know alot more than that. I can gain access to anyone’s personal information on the internet. Your internet detectives and profilers are clowns.

I assure you that you should take this threat very seriously. I can kill you any time I want. You could die of a heart attack or a seizure tommorow and the police would never rule it a murder.

Why am I not afraid to tell you this? Because you claim that your death should be ruled a homicide anyway and that you get death threats all the time. It doesn’t matter what you know, it’s what you can prove. You’ll never find me and I will get away with killing you. By the way, Chicago is a very nice city. I visited last December. Sinclair, you don’t want to end up like Russert, Palfrey and Young. This isn’t a game. Don’t attend this Press Conference. If you don’t die the next day I promise you, you won’t live to see the 4th of July.

The above is from the same 22 year old DC resident that US Attorney Taylor and the FBI refused to identify to me and my Attorney, and refused to prosecute.

The law seems to only apply to when it is being used to try and screw me, but not when it is 22 year old guy living with his parents in the DC area (this info was obtained through a DC Police officer involved in the original report filed on 6-13-08 after the first threats of 6-10 & 12-08) threatening for the third time to murder someone (ME) for speaking out about Barack Obama.

NOTE

To Follow this story and for real time live information and up to date information regarding Mr. Larry Sinclair’s allegations, “Senator Obama and Larry Sinclair engaged in the illegal use of cocaine and engaged in gay sex in 1999”, see links below:

Larry Sinclair’s Blog

CitizenWell’s Blog

Obami.com Blog

The Audacity Of Opposing Obama Has Given Rise To A Plethora Of Serious Threats.

June 28, 2008

From Mr. Sinclair’s Blog:

Yet More Threats From The Obamanots

Posted by Larry Sinclair on Saturday, June 28, 2008

The following was sent to me

John Reader Says:
June 28, 2008 at 6:21 am

Listen Larry, and listen Good, you dirty criminal scum bagging felon piece of filth. Remove my posts on your syncopate suckers web site post haste. You are playing with fire; I can, and will, follow you personally to each, and every, house of incarceration and personally speak to your incarcerators/jailers from now until the day you depart this earth—Do you get the picture feces? I don’t just talk, I act, and you are starting to offend me big time. I am doing the same service for a local corrupt sheriff indicted and sentenced on federal charges who had the audacity to mess with me. I am ready, willing and able to follow your useless crime filled life you shit head criminal. You don’t know trouble is until you mess with me you putrid mess. I love to put bullying, victimizing perp criminals in their place—You know what jail is like, don’t you perp criminal? I am timing your filthy ass, and the posts should be down shortly you filthy, dung pile cretin criminal. Don’t test my patience; You may have messed with others, but I know how to deal with people like you. How about some federal time to go with your state time? Huh? Now, do you hear me perp, do you get the picture? I will say it louder—I WILL SEE YOU IN A FEDERAL INSTITUTION FOR YOUR CRIMES…GET IT?

I guess all I can say is BRING IT ON!! AGAIN!

Mr. Sinclair continues to stand strong and many others from all different walks of life are also lending their support to his right to assert his allegations in the public square. Where is the Media???? Cowards!

No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices.
Edward R. Murrow

Did Rezko prosecutors protect Obama?

June 27, 2008

Rezko Watch Reports:

Friday, June 27, 2008

Did Rezko prosecutors protect Obama? Or should he be worried about what comes next?

“No matter how much he kicks them in the ribs, they still protect him,” one RezkoWatcher commented only this morning when speaking of Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.). Let’s hope that this is not true.

We learn from the Chicago Sun-Times that “[n]ewly unsealed documents show that prosecutors sought to call witnesses to testify” about convicted political fixer Antoin “Tony” Rezko’s ties to Sen. Obama. For whatever reason, “prosecutors opted against bringing Obama into the mix” during Rezko’s recently concluded two-month trial.

“And references to Obama were not only kept out of the trial during his run for the primary—it was kept under seal,” Natasha Korecki reported June 26, 2008. “Until today.”

What we do not learn is why prosecutors did not bring up Obama’s name more often, particularly since U.S. District Judge Amy J. St. Eve “ruled that they could.”

Korecki wrote:

The filing indicates that the prosecution wanted witnesses to talk about Rezko’s prowess as an Obama fund-raiser and his influence in getting two others — Joseph Aramanda and Semir Sirazi — to donate Rezko money to Obama’s campaigns in their names. The money kicked into Obama’s campaigns came from an illicit kickback scheme. Obama has since donated that money to charity.

Is it possible that there are more troubling days ahead for Sen. Obama—particularly since rumors are rumbling around Springfield that either 1.) impeachment may be on the table for Blagojevich or 2.) Rezko’s prosecutors are ready to paint a target on Blagojevich’s back? Either way, speculation abounds that Blagojevich is no Rezko; he may not be willing to so quickly exchange his mansion for a jail cell.

h/t Bill Baar, who agrees: “Walls are closing in and the air is getting thin for the Governor. He won’t go down alone.”

Related articles:

· Natasha Korecki, Who lied, witnesses — or gov? Feds reveal he denied pay-to-play remarks described by 2 in court, Chicago Sun-Times, June 27, 2008.

· Jeff Coen and Bob Secter, Feds quizzed Blagojevich. Records show talks in Rezko inquiry, Chicago Tribune, June 27, 2008.

Attorney General Biden of Delaware, Joe Biden, Larry Sinclair, Delaware warrant, DC fabricated warrant, Biden, Obama Camp chicanery

June 26, 2008

From CitizenWells

June 26, 2008 · No Comments

I just spoke to Larry Sinclair. The Delaware warrant that initiated Sinclair’s questionable arrest in Washington DC, came straight from the office of Delaware Attorney Biden, the son of Senator Joe Biden. Senator Joe Biden, is of course, a front runner for VP with Barack Obama.

Larry Sinclair has documentation and facts regarding this politically motivated chicanery. This arrest scenario, reminiscent of the Soviet Union Gulags, smelled bad enough before I got the details from Sinclair. Now the stench will be smelled by average Americans as they ponder the possible regime of Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

In the absence of response from either Attorney General Biden or Senator Joe Biden, I am charging the Bidens with corruption and tampering with the judicial system for political gain. What else would you expect from someone mentioned in the same sentence as Obama. Obama comes from the epicenter of crime and corruption in Illinoiis, as evidenced by his close, long time ties to the criminal Rezko.

Larry Sinclair and the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree of Change We Can Believe In.

June 24, 2008

Larry Sinclair was freed early this evening and he is back and he is not going away. As Americans, we all need the answers to the questions surrounding Mr. Sinclair arrest.

Questions about:

Given that many influential politicians and media people knew with reasonable certainty what Mr. Sinclair was likely to say before the National Press Club and fully realized that the allegations that he and Sen. Barrack Obama engaged in the illegal use of cocaine and consensual gay sex in 1999 would be politically damaging to the Senator, were any legal processes encouraged to be bent, relaxed, expanded, manipulated, or bastardized in relation to the issuance of Mr. Sinclair’s arrest warrant, its timing of execution or location of execution?

Was there any improper official governmental action involved regarding the issuance of the arrest warrant or the timing of its execution? Reliable sources say that in January of 2008, a criminal records check was conducted for Mr. Sinclair and no active warrants came back on the report.

Was there a preexisting arrest warrant?

What was the Attorney General of Delaware’s role in the issuance, timing, or execution of the arrest warrant for Mr. Larry Sinclair?

Did the fact that the Attorney General’s father Senator Joe Biden is speculated to be a leading candidate for Sen. Obama’s VP have anything to do with Mr. Sinclair’s arrest?

Would any other active arrest warrant in Delaware with similar facts been executed in this manner?

Given that the manner of execution of this arrest warrant against Larry Sinclair appeared to be intentionally and meticulously calculated to infringe upon Mr. Sinclair’s ability to exercise his rights of free speech; and further attempted to discredit the weight of his statements before the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. by an unnecessary and unwarranted public arrest – who was directly and indirectly involved in this possible abuse of Delaware’s and Washington, D.C.’s judicial and legal processes?

Why was Mr. Sinclair held for such a long time?

Was he in effect being held as a political prisoner?

These and many other questions must be answered about this highly suspect exercise of political theater masquerading as a legitimate legal process!

I leave you with this quote,

No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices.
Edward R. Murrow

Mr. Sinclair has recounted this seemingly malicious arrest on his blog.

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/what-really-happened-at-the-national-press-club/#comment-53267

Larry Sinclair and We All Need The Abuse of Legal Process Questions Answered!

June 24, 2008

CitizenWell’s writes this evening:

Larry Sinclair is free, Why was Sinclair arrested, Another failed attempt to smear Sinclair, Parties responsible should be held accountable

June 24, 2008 · No Comments

Larry Sinclair was transported to Delaware and appeared before a
judge. Sinclair was allowed to return home.

Why was Sinclair arrested?

I have it on authority that they tried to arrest Sinclair before
the news conference began.

Did the DC police fabricate a warrant in order to arrest Sinclair?
First Axelrod and the Obama Campaign attack and try to discredit
Sinclair.

Next multiple death threats were made.

Then Jane Hamsher, on her website, encouraged Obama supporters
to sign a petition to try to prevent Sinclair from speaking at
his news conference.

Then Sinclair is arrested before he can answer more questions.

Is this the kind of change you want? This is the kind of change
the German people got with the Adolf Hitler and the Nazis.

I intend to get to the bottom of this chicanery.

Larry Sinclair? Obama? Political Prisoner? Hmmmm? Biden? Really? Hmmm?

June 22, 2008

Hmmmm?

When Politicians exert such power and influence that it causes the altering of normal processes of law enforcement solely to preclude the sounds of dissenting voices – we have all lost a tremendous amount.

It could be argued that a very determined dissenting voice has been incarcerated by political influences on law enforcement this past June 18, 2008. It is past time for the authorities to free Larry Sinclair who is now possibly being held as a Political Prisoner. Hmmmm?

Let’s think about this for a moment. Hmmmm?

Mr. Larry Sinclair was arrested on June 18, 2008, after his presentation before The National Press Club (NPC). There are reports that the arrest was intended to take place prior to Mr. Sinclair’s presentation before the NPC wherein he made allegations that in 1999 Sen. Obama and he ingested crack cocaine and engaged in homosexual activities. Hmmm?

Joseph Robinette “Beau” Biden III (born February 3, 1969) is an American politician and lawyer from Wilmington, in New Castle County, Delaware. He is a member of the Democratic Party and is the incumbent Attorney General of Delaware. He is the son of U.S. Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Hmmm?

VP speculation swirls around Sen. Biden

…”Biden’s name has been among those often mentioned, largely for the same reason the Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman is often touted as a possible candidate for secretary of state…. Hmmm?

Joseph R. “Beau” Biden, III took office as Delaware’s Attorney General in January 2007…. …. Hmmm?

Late Addition:  CitizenWells writes today on Mr. Sinclair’s blog: “…I have information from two reliable sources that Sinclair’s record was thoroughly checked in January 2008 and there were no other outstanding warrants….” Hmmm? So there were no active arrest warrants in Delaware for Mr. Sinclair in January of this year, 2008.  Hmmm?

Let’s see –

What would it take to cause law enforcement from Delaware to arrange the arrest of Mr. Larry Sinclair in Washington, D.C.? Hmmm?

Is this how Delaware’s law enforcement normally goes about executing an arrest warrant? Hmmm?

Whose signature would be required? Hmmm?

Whose direction could instigate it? Hmmm?

For what purpose could it serve? Hmmm?

Hmmm?

Article: Is 1st Amendment on life support?

June 22, 2008

Very good article from National Press Club perspective.

I took exception to Ms. Smith’s statement in the article:

….My point is that the very thing the people who advocated blocking Sinclair’s press conference said they feared – widespread media coverage – simply didn’t happen because no credible news outlet would publish those kinds of allegations without first verifying them….

My response:

The problem is that No Credible News outlet has tried to do either – verify or disprove Mr. Sinclair’s allegations.

Published: June 22, 2008 6:00 a.m.

Is 1st Amendment

on life support?

Commentary by Sylvia A. Smith

Commentary by Sylvia A. Smith
Washington editor

WASHINGTON – After a week of relentless e-mails and phone calls from people who were outraged at the prospect of a guy scheduling a press conference to make allegations about Barack Obama, I’m not sure extreme CPR could resuscitate the idea of free speech in some Americans’ minds.

The message they sent was that the guy is a crackpot and a felon and therefore should be prevented from speaking.

Let me fill you in on what happened.

As you might know, I’m the president of the National Press Club this year. The Press Club is a major venue for newsmaking in Washington. We invite lots of interesting, provocative and newsy people to speak here.

But we also rent our meeting rooms to people and groups. They might have a private event (a wedding reception or a conference limited to their own members). Or they might rent space to conduct a press conference.

When that happens, the NPC functions essentially as a conference center.

A couple of weeks ago, one of our meeting rooms was reserved by a customer for a press conference. As it turned out, Larry Sinclair wanted to say he had done illegal things with Obama.

There’s lots of stuff going on in Washington that competes for journalists’ time and attention. The likelihood of much media coverage for this fellow was pretty low because of the outlandishness of his claims and (if anyone had done a Google search on him) his dicey background.

But then a few blogs got wind of the event. They huffed and they puffed that Obama was being unfairly attacked. They detailed Sinclair’s allegations. They stoked their readers to try to force the National Press Club to silence him….

The underlying message I got from the callers and e-mailers was that the First Amendment and free speech are an impediment to the way they think things ought to be. Or that while some people are free to speak, others should not be.

That way of thinking is a lot scarier than allegations from Larry Sinclair…

Go to Article

If These Three Strikes Were Committed By Sen. John McCain

June 21, 2008

The United States Main Stream Media Would Have Called Senator John McCain OUT!

The Critical Question:

Do we have an impartial umpire calling the 2008 Presidential Election?

It is clear from the actions of Senator Obama, that he has little or no appreciation for the laws, customs and traditions of The United States of America.

It is clear from his actions that he believes that any such laws, customs and traditions should only apply to the bitter people who cling to their guns and religion.

Strike 3 for Senator Barrack Hussein Obama

It can be argued that Senator Obama and his handlers knowingly and intentionally violated a criminal law set forth in The United States Code.

§ 713. Use of likenesses of the great seal of the United States, the seals of the President and Vice President, the seal of the United States Senate, the seal of the United States House of Representatives, and the seal of the United States Congress

Whoever knowingly displays any printed or other likeness of the great seal of the United States, or of the seals of the President or the Vice President of the United States, or the seal of the United States Senate, or the seal of the United States House of Representatives, or the seal of the United States Congress, or any facsimile thereof, in, or in connection with, any advertisement, poster, circular, book, pamphlet, or other publication, public meeting, play, motion picture, telecast, or other production, or on any building, monument, or stationery, for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States or by any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both….

(b) Whoever, except as authorized under regulations promulgated by the President and published in the Federal Register, knowingly manufactures, reproduces, sells, or purchases for resale, either separately or appended to any article manufactured or sold, any likeness of the seals of the President or Vice President, or any substantial part thereof, except for manufacture or sale of the article for the official use of the Government of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.….

(f) A violation of the provisions of this section may be enjoined at the suit of the Attorney General, (1) in the case of the great seal of the United States and the seals of the President and Vice President, upon complaint by any authorized representative of any department or agency of the United States…

The Charge:

On or about June 20, 2008, Sen. Obama and his staff did knowly and intentionally violate § 713 (a) and (b) of the United States Code.

The Proof:

A photograph was taken of Sen. Barrack Hussein Obama engaging in this criminal conduct.

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., speaks during a meeting of Democratic Governors at the Chicago History Museum in Chicago Friday, June 20, 2008. A new seal debuted on Obama’s podium Friday, sporting iconography used in the U.S. presidential seal, the blue background, the eagle clutching arrows on left and olive branch on right, but with symbolic differences. Instead of the Latin ‘E pluribus unum’ (Out of many, one), Obama’s says ‘Vero possumus’, rough Latin for ‘Yes, we can.’ Instead of ‘Seal of the President of the United States’, Obama’s Web site address is listed. And instead of a shield, Obama’s eagle wears his ‘O’ campaign logo with a rising sun representing hope ahead.

Strike 2 for Senator Barrack Hussein Obama

Senator Obama does not reflect any knowledge that there is a big difference between Memorial Day and Veteran’s Day.

Barack Obama’s Memorial Day speech, in which he said, “On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes—and I see many of them in the audience here today—our sense of patriotism is particularly strong” and talked about how his uncle helped liberate Auschwitz, a task actually accomplished by the Red Army. (Late Tuesday, Obama’s camp clarified that the candidate meant to say Buchenwald, not Auschwitz.)

Strike 1 for Senator Barrack Hussein Obama

This clear violation of custom speaks for itself.

The Question once again:

Do we have an impartial umpire calling the 2008 Presidential Election?

To this point the media has shown nothing but distain for the concept of fairness in vetting the candidates.

When will the Media investigate Larry Sinclair’s allegations of gay sex and drug use with Senator Obama?