Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

When Will the Media’s Investigations Begin?

June 20, 2008

The Official Un-Cut Version of Larry Sinclair’s National Press Club Presentation Video Is Located Here:

In this video Mr. Sinclair describes his allegations of drug and sexual encounters in 1999 with Sen. Obama. He presents enough information (names, phone numbers, dates, times, etc.) to allow the press to pursue their investigations into Presidential candidate Obama’s role regarding these allegations.

Mr. Sinclair gives enough information, in enough detail, to allow the hard questions to be asked of the Senator. He implies that he has more relevant information for the press should they desire it from him. Evidently, he has been advised not to disclose all that he has at this time.

Will the Press, Investigative Reporters, the Media, do their jobs and undertake their responsibilities to investigate the backgrounds of All canidates? Or will they merely continue to investigate the backgrounds of only those who stand as obstacles to Sen. Obama’s bid to become President of the United States of America?

Will the Senator step to the plate and disprove these allegations? This has always been the easiest and most certain avenue for total resolution of these issues. Can Michelle Obama give insight/proof about the whereabouts and actions of the Barrack Obama of 1999?

Can Sen. Obama show that he was not available to Mr. Sinclair during the times and dates in question? To date, I believe he has said that he did not keep records of his whereabouts at that time. A Harvard educated lawyer and a State Senator from Illinois does not keep records? Hmmm. A man who sat in the pews of Rev. Wright’s church for 20 years and denied that he was aware of his hateful views? Hmmm. A man who has disavowed his many of his past relationships with former friends and spiritual advisors because they are not the “fill in the blank” person that I knew back then? Hmmmm. Will Senator Obama’s response be that “The 1999 Illinois Sen. Obama is not the man I knew in back then.”

That’s the issue. Does the electorate of this country really know the Sen. Obama of 1999? I don’t think so. The journalists of today, if there are any, need to inform all of us. I ask myself, when it comes to the issue of credibility: “Given what we know of Sen. Obama’s current denials and excuses of his past associations, who really is the more credible witness, Sen. Obama or Mr. Larry Sinclair?” Honestly, I don’t know the answer to that question. Will the media find out? Please, do your jobs. We all can see through your bias at this point and time.

I used to think to believe that Truth was the goal of the media. It is painfully obvious that in 2008 this is not the case. Unfortunately, that responsibility has fallen upon ill equipped internet blogs and concerned citizens. How ridiculous is that! People with limited access, varied motives, very limited resources trying to give the American people information. Sometimes the information is correct and sometimes it is partially correct. Sometimes the information is mostly lies and manipulations, sometimes it is well intentioned. But until the Media steps up and does its job, it is All that we have and the responsibility for errors lie with the Main Stream Media.

Australia Reports a Fair Depiction of Larry Sinclair’s Presentation Before The National Press Club

June 18, 2008

One of the first fair depictions of Mr. Sinclair’s presentation today at the National Press Club was written in Australia and not here in the U.S. Surprised? I’m not. Hopefully the truth will come out, whatever it may be. It is the process of allowing people to be heard that is important. See:,25197,23040467-235,00,00.html

My article, “Is It Time For The Center Of Congress To Become Independents Or Something Else And Take Control Of Our Government?” got picked up as an Op-Ed piece in the Australian media. It is at:,25197,23040467-247,00,00.html I’m sure it’s going to be a good day, today. Zach

We Need to Have a Reality Check? Who Are These People?

June 16, 2008

This is from The Rezko Watch.

Monday, June 16, 2008

Obamazoid Alert: When the picture says it all (and much more)

This picture is making the rounds. RW received it from Pundita, who received it from Binks at Free Mark Steyn!, who found it at My Pet Jawa, and so forth.

RezkoWatcher RV sends along this link from Politically Drunk, in which we find (as quoted):

The New Democratic Party: Your Either With Us 100% or Against US….

Complete Description of Larry Sinclair’s Appearance at the National Press Club.

June 15, 2008

From The National Press Club:

Larry Sinclair on Obama Time: 3:00 PM  Event Type: News Conference  Sponsored by: Veritas Federal Media  Event Location: Holeman Lounge  Details:

Larry Sinclair on Barack Obama

There will be a Pre-Registration for Press beginning at 1:00pm. All press must show media credentials and must obtain an event press pass to enter the event.

Washington, D.C. – Despite death threats and an organized campaign to prevent him from speaking publicly, Larry Sinclair — on June 18, 2008, at 2:00 PM (Sign in begins at 1:00 PM) in the Holeman Lounge of the National Press Club, 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045, will for the first time reveal the corroborating evidence for his claim that on November 6 + 7, 1999, Larry: (i) met Obama at a gay bar where Barrack Obama arranged for the purchase of federal Schedule II drugs, (ii) which Larry and Obama thereafter ingested and (iii) then engaged in hi-risk, homosexual activities.

Larry’s story burst on to the scene on January 18, 2008, when Larry released a short video containing these allegations on That video has had close to a million views yet the mainstream media has completely ignored Larry’s serious allegations. Thereafter, a clearly orchestrated campaign to discredit Larry began on the internet which forced Larry to resort to federal court to protect his reputation.

At the press conference, Larry will (i) reveal the corroborating evidence for his allegations regarding Obama, (ii) address the time-line of the response of the Obama campaign to his allegations and the murder of Donald Young, the openly gay choir director of Trinity United Church of Christ, Obama’s now-former church and (iii) the significance of the refusal of U.S. District Court Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. to allow Larry’s case to proceed.

Contact: Montgomery Sibley

Mr. Sinclair’s Event is Beginning to be Exposed Across the Pond.

June 14, 2008

National Press Club faces demands to ban Barack Obama smear merchant14 hours ago by (Alex Spillius)
The National Press Club has been inundated with complaints over its decision to stage a press conference by Larry Sinclair, a man of mysterious background who has been peddling sex and drugs claims about Barack Obama for several months.

A Couple of the Comments:

Festival of Freakdom

Vegas Vivian 14 Jun 2008 04:34

Mr. Spillius, certainly grace this event with your presence. It will be the best show in town. The Obama supporters have elevated this appearance from a freak show better ignored to a must-see event.

Report this comment

BlackArrow's avatar

Why … indeed.

BlackArrow 14 Jun 2008 06:22

“why one of Washington’s premier media platforms had been given over to Sinclair.”

Maybe because our corporate media over here are into the neocon agenda up to their own profiteering necks and are just as desperate that Obama be discredited as Cheney&Bush, McCain, and the rest of the neocons?

In any case, the sex & drug stories should be thoroughly investigated, so — if true — they can’t be used to blackmail him. Of course, such rumours didn’t seem to hurt the Clintons, but they are “continuity” types like McBush.

In any case, Obama’s wife doesn’t seem like the type to tolerate such shenanigans.

Report this comment

VinceP1974's avatar

Silencing of Dissent

VinceP1974 14 Jun 2008 10:06

The Obamas and their supporters sure don’t want their opposition to say anything.

Reminds me of this:

With Obama we started out, we couldn’t talk about his big ears ’cause that made him nervous. We’ve gone from that to this: Not only can we not mention his ears…

We can’t talk about his mother.

We can’t talk about his father.

We can’t talk about his grandmother unless he does, brings her up as a “typical white person.”

We can’t talk about his wife, can’t talk about his preacher, can’t talk about his terrorist friends, can’t talk about his voting record, can’t talk about his religion.

We can’t talk about appeasement.

We can’t talk about color; we can’t talk about lack of color.

We can’t talk about race. We can’t talk about bombers and mobsters who are his friends. We can’t talk about schooling. We can’t talk about his name, “Hussein.”

We can’t talk about his lack of experience. Can’t talk about his income. Can’t talk about his flag pin.

This started out we can’t call him a liberal.

It started out we just couldn’t talk about his ears.

Now we can’t say anything about him

Mr. Sinclair’s National Press Club Event Requires More Room, Time, and May Include a Special Guest!

June 13, 2008

From Mr. Sinclair’s Blog:


Posted by Larry Sinclair on Friday, June 13, 2008

The following changes have been made in the Wednesday June 18, 2008 News Conference originally scheduled for the Lisagor Room at the National Press Club.

The event is now scheduled for Wednesday, June 18, 2008 from 1-5:00 PM in the HOLEMAN LOUNGE at the National Press Club.

This change was due to capacity in the Lisagor Room was a maximum of 40 people. The Holeman Lounge has a capacity of 110. In addition the Holeman Lounge is available from 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM

It is also my understanding that a very special guest will attend to provide moral support.

It is Now Official!!! From The National Press Club Calendar

June 11, 2008


Climate / Health Patterns
History Committee
Sergey Stanishev
Larry Sinclair on Obama
WETA News Academy

National Press Club Calendar

*********Okay Main Street Media It’s Time To PONY UP*********

Time: 3:00 PM
Event Type: News Conference
Sponsored by: Veritas Federal Media
Event Location: Lisagor Room
Larry reveals the truth about Democratic Presidential Candidate Barack Obama.

The Conflict of Mind, Heart, Politics and Obama

June 9, 2008

When looking at someone in need, many questions arise. What need do I see? What is the real need? What can I do? What should I do? How will what I do help? Does it really help the person, or just me? Here appears the conflict of mind and heart. I want to help, but what really is of help? Do I give of my wallet or do I give of my time and experience, or both? Giving of my wallet appeases my guilt but may in effect do very little to change the person’s situation. I would suggest that most of us realize that small handouts alone do little to better any serious situation that people sometimes find themselves in. What does work usually requires that someone focus on the person’s life, listens to their story, becomes available and helps him or her assess their resources. This kind of helping requires real commitment. Here again appears the conflict of mind and heart. Few of us are willing or can’t make this kind of commitment, so we rely on churches and other organizations to take our financial support and add the commitment part.

Committed people are the key to this kind of change. So what happens when the government and politicians get involved? Are the governmental bureaucrats the kind of committed individuals that can encourage positive change? The answer unfortunately is probably not, and definitely not in terms of being effective with our financial contributions (taxes) towards helping those in need. This is especially true regarding the federal level of government. I would guess that every dollar that is collected by the state or federal government goes half as far for each level of government that you get away from the local level. (County, State, Federal) And I know of no government program that is as efficient as a well organized church, business or Not-for-Profit run endeavor.[i] Government is not as responsive. Most bureaucrats are just doing a job, crunching numbers, covering their butts and after a while they begin to see the people in need as numbers or problems.

So why do we have so much effort and desire being put forth to get the federal government involved in areas that it is ill-suited? For the taxpayer, one reason might be appeasement of personal guilt -the guilt that comes from not being able to do more to solve the problems. If the government is primarily responsible, then we are not responsible and our guilt is lessened. If one is suspect of organized religion or private organizations, then government offers such a person the option of not giving support to such groups. Even though government is the least effective, it still appeases some amount of guilt.[ii] [iii]

All decent politicians, of all parties, go through the same questions the individual asks when they see people in need; they have the same desire to help, and compassion. The conflict of mind and heart is fully present. But laid upon this conflict is a bigger conflict, the conflict that arises by courting voters.

It is my belief that most politicians fully realize that the federal government is ill-suited to deal effectively with most matters of personal need. It can be done, but to be truly helpful the assistance must be a hand up, at the same time encouraging the person to become more responsible and self reliant. One only needs to remember how dysfunctional and subject to fraud the old welfare system was. The system did not offer a hand-up; instead it relied primarily on giving out checks. There was little or no incentive for the person to better his or her situation by taking steps to find work – and this in turn led to fraud.[iv] Unfortunately, many politicians have seen the voters’ appeasement needs relating to solving such problems and the desires of those who are in need (wanting relief immediately) as opportunities to build a strong dependence on the politician. If those in need are dependent upon the politician, then the politician can count on their votes.

Therefore, we should all be suspect of the motivations for big government federal programs.[v] We should not turn this power over lightly to politicians, who more and more seem to be primarily interested in their own self-interests. Local problems are many times unique, possibly involving cultural issues, and as such lend themselves to unique local solutions. We need people committed to real solutions, solutions we can believe in.

Politicians today have been promoting government as the answer to all of our problems.[vi] It is not and should not be. Whatever your beliefs about global warming, what the politicians are talking about as solutions will not work. They will most likely collapse our economy, cost millions of jobs, increase prices across the board and we will lose any global competitive advantage that we may have. The answer to CO2 in the atmosphere will come from technologies that will remove it, possibly converting it into carbon fiber products, or something else like that. Carbon credits, cap and trade, taxes, etc. all go back to that notion of appeasing our guilt, creating dependence and giving the illusion of being in charge.

Once again, what it will take is people with real commitment to solutions, not commitment to regulations and their own power. If we give up our duties and responsibilities – and elect politicians who see themselves as our saviors, elite, our Shepard, all knowing – we will be left with a Nanny State that will control every aspect of our lives. If that is what we want, we should vote for Senator Obama.

To date, Senator Obama has not exhibited commitment to solutions that are thoughtful, innovative, realistic and sustainable. He has exploited, enhanced, manipulated our concerns and raised them to the level of fear. What he is offering the masses is to alleviate our guilt and inherited blame for not doing enough- and millions of young voters have fallen for it hook, line and sinker. He has done this with the help of the media who have been swooning over him. Sen. Obama’s supporters are increasing becoming a cult that does not tolerate opposition.[vii] It appears that the radical left is rising and adopting a fascist/elitist view for the rest of us.

Please America. Remember that one’s character IS reflected in those whose company he or she keeps. Who has been sought out to be in Sen. Obama’s company? In his circle are Rev. Wright, pentagon bomber William Ayers, Rezko, and many others.[viii] There are those in Senator Obama’s circle who are terrorists, a convicted criminal, racists, hateful, anti-Semitic, socialists. It also appears clear that most of these people hate America and its military; and/or blame America and Americans for all of the world’s problems. For this you can again thank the media.

With the help of the Democratic leadership, Sen. Obama has repeatedly engaged in the vilification of companies (oil companies in particular), business, President Bush, Sen. McCain (who he refers to as Bush’s third term) as scapegoats for their own shortsightedness and lack of resolve to solve problems in a realistic, compassionate manner. They have become so beholding to the extreme left wing of the party and its investment in defeat in Iraq and their hatred for the President that it shapes all of their words and actions.[ix] It’s easier to make everyone else the cause, the villain. Had we been drilling, encouraging the building of refineries, and jump starting our nuclear energy production, while at the same time encouraging investment in alternatives, we would not be in this mess with $4 a gallon gas.

The energy problems have not been solved to date because politicians are more concerned about preserving their own power or acquiring more power. They want to keep us (the voters) dependent, misled and fearful so that we will be too scared and ignorant to make them do what is right and responsible for America.

Please America, overcome your guilt and/or media influence and vote responsibly.

[i] The Senate passed legislation this week that will allow the Senate restaurant to become privatized because it is losing so much money.

[ii] There was a recent report that of self identified conservatives and self identified liberals, conservatives gave much more to charities.

[iii] Other reasons might be fear that I might be in that situation and one else would help me. So something is better than nothing.

[iv] President Clinton and the Republican led Congress make major improvements to the welfare system (tougher and more responsible love).

[v] Let’s not forget the Ethanol disaster. Food prices are rising worldwide because of this ill conceived solution to a problem that has been of the politicians own making.

[vi] Thomas Jefferson definitely favored a limited federal government.

[vii] Larry Sinclair has alleged that he did crack and had repeated gay sex with the Senator in 1999 and other issues. Mr. Sinclair, his family, and supporters have been threatened, intimidated, and abused for daring to raise a legitimate issue which reflects upon his lack of good character. See See

[viii] See for a close look at Sen. Obama’s Rezko connections.

[ix] I have not even touched on the possibility that Israel’s existence will be in greater jeopardy if Sen. Obama is elected, given his policies of appeasing people that are always looking to kill us.

Citizenwells Blog Has Been Reactivated!!!

June 5, 2008

This is Great News. Citizenwells has a great blog that is full of information about Sen. Obaba that is not easily discovered.

Citizenwells’ Blog is Inactive??? Censorship??? Denying Free Speech?

June 5, 2008

Below you will find Citizenwells’ post on Mr. Sinclair’s Blog.

· citizenwells Says:
Thursday, June 5, 2008 at 7:20 am

Hi all.
Logged on this morning and my account is inactive. I emailed them.
Can’t imagine they would be stupid enough to shut me down. I will give them the benefit of the doubt. I hear that the moron twins got a reprimand. This could be a reprisal. Obviously I have a long term plan to move forward if necessary. I also have a technical background. Even though I have been out of the IT field for years, when I began in 1970, we dealt with bits and bytes. All computing is based on that.
Also, I had already planned to initiate congressional hearings on the control, manipulation and withholding of information on par with that of Orwell’s 1984. If an attempt is being made to prevent more information about Obama from getting out, it will just add fuel to the fire.
The no brainer is, we can’t all be shut down. They can’t murder all of us.
Minimally in the short term, if necessary, I will share any articles and information I have.
So, I will wait a short time and see. If attacked, i am prepared for war.
Citizen Wells