Archive for the ‘evidence’ Category

When Will the Media’s Investigations Begin?

June 20, 2008

The Official Un-Cut Version of Larry Sinclair’s National Press Club Presentation Video Is Located Here: http://www.larrysinclair.org/press.html

In this video Mr. Sinclair describes his allegations of drug and sexual encounters in 1999 with Sen. Obama. He presents enough information (names, phone numbers, dates, times, etc.) to allow the press to pursue their investigations into Presidential candidate Obama’s role regarding these allegations.

Mr. Sinclair gives enough information, in enough detail, to allow the hard questions to be asked of the Senator. He implies that he has more relevant information for the press should they desire it from him. Evidently, he has been advised not to disclose all that he has at this time.

Will the Press, Investigative Reporters, the Media, do their jobs and undertake their responsibilities to investigate the backgrounds of All canidates? Or will they merely continue to investigate the backgrounds of only those who stand as obstacles to Sen. Obama’s bid to become President of the United States of America?

Will the Senator step to the plate and disprove these allegations? This has always been the easiest and most certain avenue for total resolution of these issues. Can Michelle Obama give insight/proof about the whereabouts and actions of the Barrack Obama of 1999?

Can Sen. Obama show that he was not available to Mr. Sinclair during the times and dates in question? To date, I believe he has said that he did not keep records of his whereabouts at that time. A Harvard educated lawyer and a State Senator from Illinois does not keep records? Hmmm. A man who sat in the pews of Rev. Wright’s church for 20 years and denied that he was aware of his hateful views? Hmmm. A man who has disavowed his many of his past relationships with former friends and spiritual advisors because they are not the “fill in the blank” person that I knew back then? Hmmmm. Will Senator Obama’s response be that “The 1999 Illinois Sen. Obama is not the man I knew in back then.”

That’s the issue. Does the electorate of this country really know the Sen. Obama of 1999? I don’t think so. The journalists of today, if there are any, need to inform all of us. I ask myself, when it comes to the issue of credibility: “Given what we know of Sen. Obama’s current denials and excuses of his past associations, who really is the more credible witness, Sen. Obama or Mr. Larry Sinclair?” Honestly, I don’t know the answer to that question. Will the media find out? Please, do your jobs. We all can see through your bias at this point and time.

I used to think to believe that Truth was the goal of the media. It is painfully obvious that in 2008 this is not the case. Unfortunately, that responsibility has fallen upon ill equipped internet blogs and concerned citizens. How ridiculous is that! People with limited access, varied motives, very limited resources trying to give the American people information. Sometimes the information is correct and sometimes it is partially correct. Sometimes the information is mostly lies and manipulations, sometimes it is well intentioned. But until the Media steps up and does its job, it is All that we have and the responsibility for errors lie with the Main Stream Media.

U. S. Diplomacy and Why Larry Sinclair’s allegations of gay sex and drug use must be investigated.

May 27, 2008

U. S. Diplomacy and Why Larry Sinclair’s allegations of gay sex and drug use must be investigated.

As we know, Sen. Obama has stated that he would sit down with the enemies of the United States as part of his foreign diplomacy position. The degree of preparation before such meetings and whether it would be interpreted as appeasement or lack of resolve are questions for others. I just wonder if the Democratic leadership has thought about the huge logistical consequences and embarrassment to the United States’ diplomacy efforts if the next President is discovered at some point to be bisexual and an adulterer.

Are they willing to be responsible for those and any other legitimate consequences, especially given that they are fully aware of the allegations and have chosen not to act or require investigation into the veracity of the charges? I would bet that Al Jazeera and other foreign news services are monitoring the rumors about the candidates that are circulating on the internet and that they would likely withhold their comments until the most politically damaging effect to the United States can be achieved. The U.S., the great Satan, might beA being led by a bisexual adulterer as its President -WOW. It seems as though the Democratic leadership should think about this. Therefore, I suggest that not only must the allegations be investigated and the truth discovered, but if the charges have any possibility of being true – they need to be affirmatively disproved by Sen. Obama. All he needs to do is prove he was not in Chicago during the time in question. This allegation, true or not, could very well further damage the reputation of the United States.

Some would say that Mr. Sinclair completed the investigation himself by agreeing to take a polygraph examination. Evidently, the results indicated that there was some deception present on Mr. Sinclair’s part. However, the whole story about that polygraph examination is not being circulated and is being represented as some sort of equivocation of total deceit on Mr. Sinclair’s part. That representation is not true. Many problems were present before, during and after the administration of the polygraph.

A former news reporter and anchor, Delenn states: There’s a reason that polygraphs aren’t accepted as evidence in most American courtrooms: they’re grossly inaccurate. And in Larry Sinclair’s case, keep in mind; the (unbiased) computer passed Sinclair. It was the human examiner who considered SOME of Sinclair’s responses untruthful… the human examiner who a) hooked the machine up incorrectly; and b) got his supposed doctorate from an online diploma mill.Additional, the group that organized the polygraph and promised to make the complete polygraph available failed to do so.

Taken together with the new allegations that have come out regarding Sen. Obama and gay sex, the flawed polygraph looks even more suspect. There is now, once again, the possibility that Mr. Sinclair is telling the truth. The statements from Rev. Manning that Sen. Obama and Rev. Wright are closet homosexuals, the statement from a person on Mr. Sinclair’s blog that one of Obama’s pilots saw Obama kissing a male aid, and a Chicago restaurant owner learning from her patrons of Obama being on the “down low”– all tend to support Mr. Sinclair’s allegations. Mr. Sinclair and Rev. Manning claim to have evidence proving their allegations, but they each say they are waiting on disclosing the evidence. (It might be that advice of counsel or political timing is the reason.) However, it seems as though the main street media is determined to keep these allegations from seeing the light of day and truth.

In conclusion, given the enormous importance of having the best possible person in the Presidency, it is imperative that Mr. Sinclair’s allegations be thoroughly investigated.

To view the complete article with endnotes go here.