Archive for the ‘Drugs’ Category

A Step Towards Respect of Our Laws and The Social Mores by Legalizing Drugs

June 29, 2008

June 29, 2008 by zachjonesishome

(An Approach to Change That Might Lessen Our Tax Burden)

By ZachJonesIsHome

Have you ever asked the question, “Why do so many people bend, break, and/or ignore the law?” I have – and I think it comes down to a pervasive belief (on some level) that many of our laws are not reasonably related to the protection of our society. Many of our laws are intended to restrict decision-making that should be strictly personal in nature. The law caudles us, treats us like children – without the experience to make informed decisions. Instead of developing only laws that address conduct that has the potential of harming others in our society, we develop laws that tell the individual adult that he or she cannot consider a decision they are facing, together with its possible consequences and then choose to live with those consequences.

As stated by George Orwell, On the whole, human beings want to be good, but not too good, and not quite all the time.”

As a result, the consequences (if you will) are that many adults will decide to do the thing they are considering (even if it is illegal) and take the risk. And from that very act, one loses a certain degree of respect for the sanctity of all laws and may become more likely to shrug their shoulders when they see someone else violating some other law(s) that could be construed as an unreasonable infringement on free choice. The individual might also feel the need to cover up his/her indiscretion. (Maybe by lying on applications to licensing boards, lying on tax returns, doing favors of position to others to attempt to cover up, lying to the courts, etc.) Furthermore, it could be argued that it would then become against that person’s best interest to voluntarily help the police by providing information to them regarding other matters – the danger being that if they get involved one might draw more attention than they want. That’s too bad, since the police have historically relied on that type of assistance in its effort to combat crime. And it is always important to remember that children are watching parents violate the law and will learn that they too should be able to pick and choose which laws they are willing to follow….

In conclusion, it is the sanctity of the system of laws that is at issue here. That system can only be respected if it is clearly, rationally related to trying to protect us from harm from others. However, it fails when the system attempts to usurp decisions from us that are clearly ours to make.

So therefore Senator Obama, you can come clean to me about the allegations of your use of illicit drugs and having gay sex with Larry Sinclair in 1999. Just do it. And where is the American media in this? AWOL. Cowards!

Read the complete article here.

NOTE

To Follow this story and for real time live information and up to date information regarding Mr. Larry Sinclair’s allegations, “Senator Obama and Larry Sinclair engaged in the illegal use of cocaine and engaged in gay sex in 1999”, see links below:

Larry Sinclair’s Blog

CitizenWell’s Blog

Obami.com Blog

When Are The US Attorney and FBI Going To Take Threats Of Murder Seriously, After I am Killed?

June 29, 2008

From Larry Sinclair’s Blog:

Posted by Larry Sinclair on Sunday, June 29, 2008

The DC Office of the FBI and the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia has some explaining to do in regards to this guy threatening me on the day they claim they put an end to his threats.

As with his first Youtube account, he opened the account sent the threat and then closed the account. If the US Attorney for DC and SA Born of the DC FBI do not identify this individual and arrest him then I will take legal action against both offices for the emotional stress they have caused me by my having to deal with repeated death threats from an individual they (the FBI and US Attorney and DC Police) have claimed they contacted after the first threats.

I just happened to log in to my Youtube account and look what I found in my Youtube email box:

Oswaldo12345678

Jun 15, 2008

What happened to Tim Russert could happen to you….

What is the perfect murder? A murder that doesn’t get ruled a murder. Sinclair, there is no amount of security that can protect you from me. Do you really believe the FBI is going to investigate your death threats on Youtube? You really are a delusional little man. Your followers are even more pathetic than you are. I recieved several threats in my PM box shortly after you put my message in your blog. One of your followers even claimed to be an FBI agent. I can only imagine the look on her wrinkled face when I replied, revealing the fact that I know her full name. I know alot more than that. I can gain access to anyone’s personal information on the internet. Your internet detectives and profilers are clowns.

I assure you that you should take this threat very seriously. I can kill you any time I want. You could die of a heart attack or a seizure tommorow and the police would never rule it a murder.

Why am I not afraid to tell you this? Because you claim that your death should be ruled a homicide anyway and that you get death threats all the time. It doesn’t matter what you know, it’s what you can prove. You’ll never find me and I will get away with killing you. By the way, Chicago is a very nice city. I visited last December. Sinclair, you don’t want to end up like Russert, Palfrey and Young. This isn’t a game. Don’t attend this Press Conference. If you don’t die the next day I promise you, you won’t live to see the 4th of July.

The above is from the same 22 year old DC resident that US Attorney Taylor and the FBI refused to identify to me and my Attorney, and refused to prosecute.

The law seems to only apply to when it is being used to try and screw me, but not when it is 22 year old guy living with his parents in the DC area (this info was obtained through a DC Police officer involved in the original report filed on 6-13-08 after the first threats of 6-10 & 12-08) threatening for the third time to murder someone (ME) for speaking out about Barack Obama.

NOTE

To Follow this story and for real time live information and up to date information regarding Mr. Larry Sinclair’s allegations, “Senator Obama and Larry Sinclair engaged in the illegal use of cocaine and engaged in gay sex in 1999”, see links below:

Larry Sinclair’s Blog

CitizenWell’s Blog

Obami.com Blog

The Audacity Of Opposing Obama Has Given Rise To A Plethora Of Serious Threats.

June 28, 2008

From Mr. Sinclair’s Blog:

Yet More Threats From The Obamanots

Posted by Larry Sinclair on Saturday, June 28, 2008

The following was sent to me

John Reader Says:
June 28, 2008 at 6:21 am

Listen Larry, and listen Good, you dirty criminal scum bagging felon piece of filth. Remove my posts on your syncopate suckers web site post haste. You are playing with fire; I can, and will, follow you personally to each, and every, house of incarceration and personally speak to your incarcerators/jailers from now until the day you depart this earth—Do you get the picture feces? I don’t just talk, I act, and you are starting to offend me big time. I am doing the same service for a local corrupt sheriff indicted and sentenced on federal charges who had the audacity to mess with me. I am ready, willing and able to follow your useless crime filled life you shit head criminal. You don’t know trouble is until you mess with me you putrid mess. I love to put bullying, victimizing perp criminals in their place—You know what jail is like, don’t you perp criminal? I am timing your filthy ass, and the posts should be down shortly you filthy, dung pile cretin criminal. Don’t test my patience; You may have messed with others, but I know how to deal with people like you. How about some federal time to go with your state time? Huh? Now, do you hear me perp, do you get the picture? I will say it louder—I WILL SEE YOU IN A FEDERAL INSTITUTION FOR YOUR CRIMES…GET IT?

I guess all I can say is BRING IT ON!! AGAIN!

Mr. Sinclair continues to stand strong and many others from all different walks of life are also lending their support to his right to assert his allegations in the public square. Where is the Media???? Cowards!

No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices.
Edward R. Murrow

Attorney General Biden of Delaware, Joe Biden, Larry Sinclair, Delaware warrant, DC fabricated warrant, Biden, Obama Camp chicanery

June 26, 2008

From CitizenWells

June 26, 2008 · No Comments

I just spoke to Larry Sinclair. The Delaware warrant that initiated Sinclair’s questionable arrest in Washington DC, came straight from the office of Delaware Attorney Biden, the son of Senator Joe Biden. Senator Joe Biden, is of course, a front runner for VP with Barack Obama.

Larry Sinclair has documentation and facts regarding this politically motivated chicanery. This arrest scenario, reminiscent of the Soviet Union Gulags, smelled bad enough before I got the details from Sinclair. Now the stench will be smelled by average Americans as they ponder the possible regime of Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

In the absence of response from either Attorney General Biden or Senator Joe Biden, I am charging the Bidens with corruption and tampering with the judicial system for political gain. What else would you expect from someone mentioned in the same sentence as Obama. Obama comes from the epicenter of crime and corruption in Illinoiis, as evidenced by his close, long time ties to the criminal Rezko.

Larry Sinclair and We All Need The Abuse of Legal Process Questions Answered!

June 24, 2008

CitizenWell’s writes this evening:

Larry Sinclair is free, Why was Sinclair arrested, Another failed attempt to smear Sinclair, Parties responsible should be held accountable

June 24, 2008 · No Comments

Larry Sinclair was transported to Delaware and appeared before a
judge. Sinclair was allowed to return home.

Why was Sinclair arrested?

I have it on authority that they tried to arrest Sinclair before
the news conference began.

Did the DC police fabricate a warrant in order to arrest Sinclair?
First Axelrod and the Obama Campaign attack and try to discredit
Sinclair.

Next multiple death threats were made.

Then Jane Hamsher, on her website, encouraged Obama supporters
to sign a petition to try to prevent Sinclair from speaking at
his news conference.

Then Sinclair is arrested before he can answer more questions.

Is this the kind of change you want? This is the kind of change
the German people got with the Adolf Hitler and the Nazis.

I intend to get to the bottom of this chicanery.

Larry Sinclair? Obama? Political Prisoner? Hmmmm? Biden? Really? Hmmm?

June 22, 2008

Hmmmm?

When Politicians exert such power and influence that it causes the altering of normal processes of law enforcement solely to preclude the sounds of dissenting voices – we have all lost a tremendous amount.

It could be argued that a very determined dissenting voice has been incarcerated by political influences on law enforcement this past June 18, 2008. It is past time for the authorities to free Larry Sinclair who is now possibly being held as a Political Prisoner. Hmmmm?

Let’s think about this for a moment. Hmmmm?

Mr. Larry Sinclair was arrested on June 18, 2008, after his presentation before The National Press Club (NPC). There are reports that the arrest was intended to take place prior to Mr. Sinclair’s presentation before the NPC wherein he made allegations that in 1999 Sen. Obama and he ingested crack cocaine and engaged in homosexual activities. Hmmm?

Joseph Robinette “Beau” Biden III (born February 3, 1969) is an American politician and lawyer from Wilmington, in New Castle County, Delaware. He is a member of the Democratic Party and is the incumbent Attorney General of Delaware. He is the son of U.S. Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Hmmm?

VP speculation swirls around Sen. Biden

…”Biden’s name has been among those often mentioned, largely for the same reason the Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman is often touted as a possible candidate for secretary of state…. Hmmm?

Joseph R. “Beau” Biden, III took office as Delaware’s Attorney General in January 2007…. …. Hmmm?

Late Addition:  CitizenWells writes today on Mr. Sinclair’s blog: “…I have information from two reliable sources that Sinclair’s record was thoroughly checked in January 2008 and there were no other outstanding warrants….” Hmmm? So there were no active arrest warrants in Delaware for Mr. Sinclair in January of this year, 2008.  Hmmm?

Let’s see –

What would it take to cause law enforcement from Delaware to arrange the arrest of Mr. Larry Sinclair in Washington, D.C.? Hmmm?

Is this how Delaware’s law enforcement normally goes about executing an arrest warrant? Hmmm?

Whose signature would be required? Hmmm?

Whose direction could instigate it? Hmmm?

For what purpose could it serve? Hmmm?

Hmmm?

Article: Is 1st Amendment on life support?

June 22, 2008

Very good article from National Press Club perspective.

I took exception to Ms. Smith’s statement in the article:

….My point is that the very thing the people who advocated blocking Sinclair’s press conference said they feared – widespread media coverage – simply didn’t happen because no credible news outlet would publish those kinds of allegations without first verifying them….

My response:

The problem is that No Credible News outlet has tried to do either – verify or disprove Mr. Sinclair’s allegations.

Published: June 22, 2008 6:00 a.m.

Is 1st Amendment

on life support?

Commentary by Sylvia A. Smith

Commentary by Sylvia A. Smith
Washington editor

WASHINGTON – After a week of relentless e-mails and phone calls from people who were outraged at the prospect of a guy scheduling a press conference to make allegations about Barack Obama, I’m not sure extreme CPR could resuscitate the idea of free speech in some Americans’ minds.

The message they sent was that the guy is a crackpot and a felon and therefore should be prevented from speaking.

Let me fill you in on what happened.

As you might know, I’m the president of the National Press Club this year. The Press Club is a major venue for newsmaking in Washington. We invite lots of interesting, provocative and newsy people to speak here.

But we also rent our meeting rooms to people and groups. They might have a private event (a wedding reception or a conference limited to their own members). Or they might rent space to conduct a press conference.

When that happens, the NPC functions essentially as a conference center.

A couple of weeks ago, one of our meeting rooms was reserved by a customer for a press conference. As it turned out, Larry Sinclair wanted to say he had done illegal things with Obama.

There’s lots of stuff going on in Washington that competes for journalists’ time and attention. The likelihood of much media coverage for this fellow was pretty low because of the outlandishness of his claims and (if anyone had done a Google search on him) his dicey background.

But then a few blogs got wind of the event. They huffed and they puffed that Obama was being unfairly attacked. They detailed Sinclair’s allegations. They stoked their readers to try to force the National Press Club to silence him….

The underlying message I got from the callers and e-mailers was that the First Amendment and free speech are an impediment to the way they think things ought to be. Or that while some people are free to speak, others should not be.

That way of thinking is a lot scarier than allegations from Larry Sinclair…

Go to Article

When Will the Media’s Investigations Begin?

June 20, 2008

The Official Un-Cut Version of Larry Sinclair’s National Press Club Presentation Video Is Located Here: http://www.larrysinclair.org/press.html

In this video Mr. Sinclair describes his allegations of drug and sexual encounters in 1999 with Sen. Obama. He presents enough information (names, phone numbers, dates, times, etc.) to allow the press to pursue their investigations into Presidential candidate Obama’s role regarding these allegations.

Mr. Sinclair gives enough information, in enough detail, to allow the hard questions to be asked of the Senator. He implies that he has more relevant information for the press should they desire it from him. Evidently, he has been advised not to disclose all that he has at this time.

Will the Press, Investigative Reporters, the Media, do their jobs and undertake their responsibilities to investigate the backgrounds of All canidates? Or will they merely continue to investigate the backgrounds of only those who stand as obstacles to Sen. Obama’s bid to become President of the United States of America?

Will the Senator step to the plate and disprove these allegations? This has always been the easiest and most certain avenue for total resolution of these issues. Can Michelle Obama give insight/proof about the whereabouts and actions of the Barrack Obama of 1999?

Can Sen. Obama show that he was not available to Mr. Sinclair during the times and dates in question? To date, I believe he has said that he did not keep records of his whereabouts at that time. A Harvard educated lawyer and a State Senator from Illinois does not keep records? Hmmm. A man who sat in the pews of Rev. Wright’s church for 20 years and denied that he was aware of his hateful views? Hmmm. A man who has disavowed his many of his past relationships with former friends and spiritual advisors because they are not the “fill in the blank” person that I knew back then? Hmmmm. Will Senator Obama’s response be that “The 1999 Illinois Sen. Obama is not the man I knew in back then.”

That’s the issue. Does the electorate of this country really know the Sen. Obama of 1999? I don’t think so. The journalists of today, if there are any, need to inform all of us. I ask myself, when it comes to the issue of credibility: “Given what we know of Sen. Obama’s current denials and excuses of his past associations, who really is the more credible witness, Sen. Obama or Mr. Larry Sinclair?” Honestly, I don’t know the answer to that question. Will the media find out? Please, do your jobs. We all can see through your bias at this point and time.

I used to think to believe that Truth was the goal of the media. It is painfully obvious that in 2008 this is not the case. Unfortunately, that responsibility has fallen upon ill equipped internet blogs and concerned citizens. How ridiculous is that! People with limited access, varied motives, very limited resources trying to give the American people information. Sometimes the information is correct and sometimes it is partially correct. Sometimes the information is mostly lies and manipulations, sometimes it is well intentioned. But until the Media steps up and does its job, it is All that we have and the responsibility for errors lie with the Main Stream Media.

Australia Reports a Fair Depiction of Larry Sinclair’s Presentation Before The National Press Club

June 18, 2008

One of the first fair depictions of Mr. Sinclair’s presentation today at the National Press Club was written in Australia and not here in the U.S. Surprised? I’m not. Hopefully the truth will come out, whatever it may be. It is the process of allowing people to be heard that is important. See: http://www.australia.to/story/0,25197,23040467-235,00,00.html

My article, “Is It Time For The Center Of Congress To Become Independents Or Something Else And Take Control Of Our Government?” got picked up as an Op-Ed piece in the Australian media. It is at: http://www.australia.to/international/0,25197,23040467-247,00,00.html I’m sure it’s going to be a good day, today. Zach

We Need to Have a Reality Check? Who Are These People?

June 16, 2008

This is from The Rezko Watch.

Monday, June 16, 2008

Obamazoid Alert: When the picture says it all (and much more)


This picture is making the rounds. RW received it from Pundita, who received it from Binks at Free Mark Steyn!, who found it at My Pet Jawa, and so forth.

RezkoWatcher RV sends along this link from Politically Drunk, in which we find (as quoted):

The New Democratic Party: Your Either With Us 100% or Against US….