The first post on The BOPAC Report!
Dr. Orly Taitz has one reader who taken it upon herself to ask the hard (easy in this case) questions of a Harvard Professor:
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Jean WTPUSA says:Today, 10:49:10 AM“Letter emailed to Judicial Ethics Forum KSWISHER@POST.HARVARD.EDU
Dear Mr. Swisher,
I came across your Judicial Ethics forum http://judicialethicsforum.com and was wondering if I could ask you a few questions regarding Judicial Ethics.
I’m not sure if you are aware, but currently, Chief Justice Roberts and the entire SCOTUS has been asked by attorney Dr. Orly Tait to recuse themselves in regards to administering the “Oath of Office” to President Elect Obama on January 20th, as there are cases pending on the SCOTUS docket which are challenging Mr. Obama’s “Natural Born” Citizen status and therefore his “eligibility” to hold the office of POTUS. Many eligibility cases have recently made their way to the Supreme Court and some are on the docket to go to conference after the inauguration.
Additionally, it is my understanding that SCOTUS met with Mr. Obama and Sen. Biden yesterday. Isn’t that unusual for a judge to meet with a plaintiff behind closed doors when there is a case pending in front of that judge or the entire Supreme Court? Doesn’t that give the appearance of impropriety? And shouldn’t judicial ethics take precedent over political formalities?
I was wondering if you had am opinion on whether Judge Roberts is acting ethically, if he swears Obama in on Jan 20th, if Roberts and/or SCOTUS has reason to believe that Obama may perjure himself? And, if 300 Million Americans see Justice Roberts swear Obama in, thereby conveying the impression of legitimacy,=2 0won’t the jury pool be tainted if Obama is later put on trial for being a usurper? Doesn’t this act, alone, prejudice the Plaintiffs that currently have their cases bending in the SCOTUS?
PS. You may also be interested in an excellent article form Dr. Edwin Vieira, NewsWithViews.com that outlines what would occur if a Usurper is sworn on Jan 20th.
Thank you in advance for your reply.
I continue to ask the very, very, very simple question – Where is the media regarding these lawsuits?
Funny. I always get the same answer. AWOL as usual!
I’m sure Larry Sinclair could say a thing or two about the media being AWOL. I won’ t go into the litany of issues the media has ignored, misrepresented, downplayed, etc., etc., etc. Good Night from Zach covering the very first post on the The BOPAC Report!
Don’t forget tomorrow there will be a Conference regarding Berg v Obama. Don’t get too disappointed if the result is not what we all hope for. There are strong cases in the stream! Hollister vs. Barry Soetoro a/k/a Obama and Lightfoot v Bowen on the Federal level. Look also at Broe v. Reed as a case that we will see soon at the Federal level.
To review or learn about other lawsuits challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the Office of the Presidency, see: