Say it isn’t so! CitizenWells is reporting that Senator Saxby Chambliss has earned a spot on the “Constitution Hall of Shame.” The ignorance displayed in his letter clearly indicates that his selection to the Hall of Shame is deserved. So sorry, I thought he was one who has some degree of courage. It seems Gov. Palin made a mistake in putting him over the top in his election. America needs men and women with principles and a willingness to demonstrate allegiance to the Constitution of the United States by protecting it.
Senator Chambliss demonstrates the same intentional or unintentional misunderstanding of Obama’s failure to demonstrate he was born in Hawaii!
Senator Saxby Chambliss stated:
“President-elect Obama demonstrated his citizenship during his campaign
by circulating copies of his birth certificate, which showed he was
born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961.”
The Obama campaign has never produced a birth certificate despite
many attempts in court to force him to. Obama, instead has spent
hundreds of thousands of dollars and employed numerous attorneys
to avoid proving eligibility.
Senator Chambliss then stated:
“If a person is born in the United States, a certificate of live birth
issued where one is born is sufficient proof of U.S. citizenship.”
That may be true. However, one must prove that one is born in the US.
NOtice he begins with “If a person is born in the United states.”
Senator Chambliss then stated:
“The certificate, confirmed by the Hawaii Department of Health as
authentic, shows that President-elect Obama was born in Hawaii.”
Hawaii Health Dept. Officials never stated that Obama was born in
Hawaii. See below.
From the Alan Keyes lawsuit
“A press release was issued on October 31, 2008, by the Hawaii Department
of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Dr. Fukino said that she
had “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of
Health has Senator Obama’s original birth certificate on record in
accordance with state policies and procedures.” That statement failed to
resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation and press accounts.
Being “on record” could mean either that its contents are in the computer
database of the department or there is an actual “vault” original.”
“Further, the report does not say whether the birth certificate in the
“record” is a Certificate of Live Birth or a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.
In Hawaii, a Certificate of Live Birth resulting from hospital documentation,
including a signature of an attending physician, is different from a
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth. For births prior to 1972, a Certificate of
Hawaiian Birth was the result of the uncorroborated testimony of one witness
and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up
to one year from the date of the child’s birth. For that reason, its value
as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome if any of the
allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained.
The vault (long Version) birth certificate, per Hawaiian Statute 883.176
allows the birth in another State or another country to be registered in
Hawaii. Box 7C of the vault Certificate of Live Birth contains a question,
whether the birth was in Hawaii or another State or Country. Therefore,
the only way to verify the exact location of birth is to review a certified
copy or the original vault Certificate of Live Birth and compare the name of
the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor against the
birthing records on file at the hospital noted on the Certificate of the
Thank you CitizenWells for continuing to point out the amazing complicity of our Senators and Representatives in the greatest failure (at all levels of government) ever of public officials to uphold the eligibility requirements set forth in the Constitution of the United States for the Office of the Presidency. When there exists credible circumstantial and direct evidence indicating the real possiblity that Obama is attempting to seize the Office of the Presidency, public officials have a duty to demand uncontrovertible prove of Obama’s “Natural Born” status (or lack threreof). Shameful and cowardly!
In other news today, Dr. Orly is requesting active duty military to contact her if they are unwilling to follow possible orders from someone who appears to be illegitimate as President.
If you are an active member of the military and unwilling to be deployed under orders of illegitimate president Obama, contact me
Attention Commanding officers
President of the US has to be a Natural born citizen, which means one that was born in this country to parents (both) that are US citizens. (definition from Law of Nations, Emmerich De Vattel, definition by John A Bingham, framer of the 14 Th amendment.) Due to the fact that Obama’s father was not a US citizen, Obama is not a Natural Born citizen. Additionally Hi statue 338 allows foreign born children of Hawaiian residents to obtain Hawaiian Birth Certificates. Hawaii also allows Certification of Hawaiian birth to be obtained based on a statement of one relative only, such as a statement of a grandparent. Obama’s paternal grandmother in Kenya made statements that he was born in Kenya, while his maternal grandmother in Hawaii never made any statement to deny that fact. There is no corroborating evidence to show that Obama was born in Hawaii- no birthing records from any hospital in HI. Obama has spent thousands of dollars fighting in court any requests to unseal his original birth certificate and refused to provide his immigration records, any and all passports and university enrollment records. If he really was born in Hawaii, he would not be fighting to conceal from American citizens his original birth certificate, that is supposed to show the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor, he would not be hiding all other documents verifying his citizenship. He has only posted a short version COLB, that does not show the name of the Hospital or a name of the doctor. As of now there is no corroborating evidence to show that Obama was born in HI or went through immigration process coming from Kenya, therefor there is no evidence that Obama is even a legal citizen of the US. As of now there is only evidence of Obama being a citizen of Indonesia, where he and his family immigrated when he was a child and citizenship of Great Britain (Kenya was a British colony at the time of Obama’s birth), and Kenya.
Where is the media regarding the scores of challenges to Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States? AWOL as usual. The main stream media has consistently failed to hold Obama accountable for his actions and his past. Just as they ignored the allegations of Larry Sinclair that he and Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999, they are AWOL regarding the unending lawsuits challenging Obama eligibility to serve as President.
Maybe the Media will not be able to keep their pens in their pockets concerning the following!
It looks like another avenue may be opening up to hold Obama rightfully accountable for his actions:
From Dr. Orly:
if someone has Linda Starr’s phone number, please forward it to me
Hi, Copies these off http://www.obamacrimes.com a short while ago. Interesting concerning the suit with the 60 day seal. written by Linda Starr, January 05, 2009
PS: if he showed that so called legal document to run for the Illinois State or US Senate, then he has some explaining to do, since it was allegedly not printed until June 7, 2007. So, he clearly never proved his citizenship to run for the Illinois State , or US Senate either.
Touché’! And let me just tell you, if he can’t prove he was a US citizen when he was the Illinois State Senator, or the Us Senator, he can go to jail and pay huge fines and damages. Quo Tam fits the description of Phil’s action that has been under seal. And in that suit, it isn’t up to Phil to prove he wasn’t fraudulently collecting money from the government taxpayers for a seat he wasn’t eligible to hold. He has to prove he WAS ELIGIBLE to stay out of jail. Checkmate! Your boy is going to jail if he refuses to prove he was eligible to serve. …Continue Reading
Will the media be AWOL about this? Probably so.
They were AWOL about the rumors that Obama was known to be on the “down low” in Chicago. They were AWOL concerning Obama’s possible violations of the Logan Act by his actions in Kenya and Iraq. They were AWOL concerning 90% of his past associations. They were AWOL for months concerning John Edward’s affair. I never thought the state of journalism would be so bad that we need to look at publications like The National Enquirer and Globe Magazine to find the NEWS!
Speaking of Globe – they are writing about the Obama eligibility issue this week. Where is the Media? AWOL
Lastly – Don’t forget to call members of Congress and urge them to have the courage to object to the Electoral College vote on Thursday. Contact information can be found on CitizenWells’ Constitution Hall of Shame page.
Just a few sites to check daily regarding the legal challenges to Obama:
Obama Crimes – (Berg v Obama)