For Immediate Release: – 12/23/08
U.S. Supreme Court No. 08 – 570
(Washington, DC – 12/23/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States filed again with the U.S. Supreme Court an Application for an Injunction to Stay the Congressional Electoral Vote Count on January 8, 2009 until Obama Proves he is “Qualified” to be President. This time, the Application for Injunction was addressed to Justice Antonin Scalia.
On 12/09/08, Berg Justice Souter denied our Application; then Berg refiled and on 12/17/08 Justice Kennedy also denied the Request for Injunction.
Berg filed this while still waiting to hear if the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the Writ of Certiorari that he filed on October 30, 2008, requesting review of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge Surrick’s Dismissal of Philip J. Berg’s lawsuit against Barack H. Obama, Jr., the DNC and the other co-Defendants regarding “standing.” The Supreme Court has listed the case of Berg vs. Obama for “Conference” on January 9, 2008.
Mr. Berg remarked today, “I am appalled that the main stream media continues to ignore this issue as we are headed to a ‘Constitution Crisis.’ There is nothing more important than our U.S. Constitution and it must be enforced. I am concerned that our Courts have not yet decided to look into the merits of our allegations. I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally qualified ‘natural-born’ citizen and therefore, is ineligible to assume the office of President of. the United States.
Obama, knows he is not ‘natural born’ as he knows where he was born and he knows he was adopted in Indonesia; is an attorney, Harvard Law grad who taught Constitutional law; knows the Obama candidacy is the biggest ‘hoax’ attempted on the citizens of the United States in over 200 years; places our Constitution in a ‘crisis’ situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be blackmailed by leaders around the world.”
Berg concluded, “I will continue to file Court proceedings until Obama either proves he is qualified or does the right thing and states that he is proud that he, an African American, received more votes than anyone else in the Presidential election on November 4, 2008, but because of things in his past, he must withdraw his name.
For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com
For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
(800) 993-PHIL 
Fax (610) 834-7659
Cell (610) 662-3005
America’s Right also has an update on Berg Motion for Injuction.
Separate conference for injunction scheduled a week AFTER conference on certiorari petition
Apparently, according to the docket for Philip Berg’s case at the U.S. Supreme Court, the application for an injunction pending disposition of the petition for certiorari has been “referred to the Court” by Justice Antonin Scalia, with a conference scheduled for Friday, January 16, 2009…
Comment: Hopefully, the Supreme Court will do the what’s right and act to protect the Constitution. At this point, I’m not sure what is up with scheduling Berg v. Obama on January 9 and the Motion for Injunction on January 16, 2009. Mootness certainly seems to in play for the Motion for Injunction since the underlying event would have already occurred. Who knows? In any event, if the Court fails to act there will certainly be a new round of suits challenging Obama’s authority to enact/sign any legislation or executive orders.
The New Year does indeed bring the possibility of fireworks. Berg v. Obama and Larry Sinclair’s new book about his alleged drug and sex encounter with Obama will definitely deserve media attention. (Unfortunately our media will be busy courting Obama.) Could there also be an Obama indictment coming in January from the Gov. Blagojevich or Rezko mess? Happy Holidays!