How can anyone serving as President who is not a “Natural Born Citizen” issue lawful orders?
U. S. Diplomacy and Why Larry Sinclair’s allegations of drug use must be investigated.
U. S. Diplomacy and why Larry Sinclair’s allegations of drug use and gay sex must be investigated.
As we know, Sen. Obama has stated that he would sit down with the enemies of the United States as part of his foreign diplomacy position.The degree of preparation before such meetings and whether it would be interpreted as appeasement or lack of resolve are questions for others.I just wonder if the Democratic leadership has thought about the huge logistical consequences and embarrassment to the United States’ diplomacy efforts if the next President is discovered at some point to be bisexual and an adulterer.
Are they willing to be responsible for those and any other legitimate consequences, especially given that they are fully aware of the allegations and have chosen not to act or require investigation into the veracity of the charges? I would bet that Al Jazeera and other foreign news services are monitoring the rumors about the candidates that are circulating on the internet and that they would likely withhold their comments until the most politically damaging effect to the United States can be achieved. The U.S., the great Satan, might be being led by a bisexual adulterer as its President -WOW.It seems as though the Democratic leadership should think about this.Therefore, I suggest that not only must the allegations be investigated and the truth discovered, but if the charges have any possibility of being true – they need to be affirmatively disproved by Sen. Obama.All he needs to do is prove he was not in Chicago during the time in question.This allegation, true or not, could very well further damage the reputation of the United States.[i]
Some would say that Mr. Sinclair completed the investigation himself by agreeing to take a polygraph examination.Evidently, the results indicated that there was some deception present on Mr. Sinclair’s part.However, the whole story about that polygraph examination is not being circulated and is being represented as some sort of equivocation of total deceit on Mr. Sinclair’s part.That representation is not true. Many problems were present before, during and after the administration of the polygraph.
A former news reporter and anchor, Delenn states: There’s a reason that polygraphs aren’t accepted as evidence in most American courtrooms: they’re grossly inaccurate. And in Larry Sinclair’s case, keep in mind; the (unbiased) computer passed Sinclair. It was the human examiner who considered SOME of Sinclair’s responses untruthful… the human examiner who a) hooked the machine up incorrectly; and b) got his supposed doctorate from an online diploma mill.[ii]Additional, the group that organized the polygraph and promised to make the complete polygraph available failed to do so.
Taken together with the new allegations that have come out regarding Sen. Obama and gay sex, the flawed polygraph looks even more suspect.There is now, once again, the possibility that Mr. Sinclair is telling the truth.The statements from Rev. Manning that Sen. Obama and Rev. Wright are closet homosexuals, the statement from a person on Mr. Sinclair’s blog that one of Obama’s pilots saw Obama kissing a male aid[iii], and a Chicago restaurant owner learning from her patrons of Obama being on the “down low”[iv]- all tend to support Mr. Sinclair’s allegations. Mr. Sinclair and Rev. Manning claim to have evidence proving their allegations, but they each say they are waiting on disclosing the evidence. (It might be that advice of counsel or political timing is the reason.) However, it seems as though the main street media is determined to keep these allegations from seeing the light of day and truth. [v]
In conclusion, given the enormous importance of having the best possible person in the Presidency, it is imperative that Mr. Sinclair’s allegations be thoroughly investigated.