Kerchner | The BOPAC Report & Larry Sinclair's Allegations

Posts Tagged ‘Kerchner’

Third Circuit Backs Down in Kerchner v Obama – Another General States Need for Obama to Clear Up Eligibility or Resign – Major General Jerry Curry – General Vallely Speaks about Obama Impeachment – Military Needs to Wake Up – The BOPAC Report

July 23, 2010

Natural Born Citizen -

Dalai Lama has advice for Obama! America Must Demand Proof or Face the Consequences!

There are several items that those in the military need to consider over the weekend related to Obama’s lack of eligibility to serve as Commander In Chief and lack of authority to issue lawful orders.

First is a video from Hector Maldonado, Candidate for Senate in Missouri:

Next from ObamaReleaseYourRecords:

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Major General Jerry Curry says House and Senate need to serve notice on Obama to clear up his eligibility or resign.

ObamaRelease YourRecords

Retired Army Major General Jerry Ralph Curry appeared on the Talk to Solomon Show and was questioned about Obama eligibility challenger LTC Terry Lakin and Obama’s eligibility. During this exchange MGEN Curry says that LTC Lakin is a very brave man but they will try to destroy him personally. He goes on to say we shouldn’t play games with Obama. The MGEN then says the House and Senate need to serve notice on Obama to clear up his eligibility or resign. Video of the exchange embedded below.
Hat tip to the Conservative Monster. …Continue Reading

And also from General Vallely:

IMPEACH OBAMA !General Vallely speaks about Impeachment Of Obama

And finally, the 3rd District Court of Appeals backed off their attempt to intimidate Mario Apuzzo, Esq. by forcing him to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for filing a frivolous lawsuit in the case of Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et. al.

What does the 3^rd District’s action mean?

It means the court did not want to open up any possibility of discovery to Mario Apuzzo that would attract attention. They realized the screwed up and could not go forward without opening up the possibility of evidence of Obama’s ineligibility coming before the court.

The other possibility is that they wanted to punt and clear the way for Mario Apuzz to appeal Kerchner to the Supreme Court of the United States so they would take the heat for upholding the Constitution and finding Obama ineligible to serve as President.

The Supreme Court has a few possible avenues and each has consequences.

1 – The Court could do as they have been all doing and deny Cert. without comment. The consequence of this course of action (inaction) is that the millions of Americans who recognize that the issue of who is a natural born citizen is an vital Constitutional issue and who clearly see that the Court has been trying to avoid the issue (as has admitted to by Justice Thomas) will continue losing faith in the Courts and the Rule of Law. This course says that Justice is not blind – it really does matter who is involved. There is no Justice. This act of cowardice would in effect corner the American people and force them to consider other options.

2 – The Court could actually hear the case and make a ruling only on the standing issue. If they decide that the lower court erred, they would likely remand the case for further proceedings. The Court would necessarily give more guidance/explanation for the lower courts regarding the issue of standing in challenging future elections and the election process. The really brave action would be for the Supreme Court to also actually define the term “natural born citizen” for guidance to the lower court and for election officials at the state levels so this would never come up again. I’m sure there will be many in 2012 filing suits against Obama & Jindal if they have ‘standing’.

3 – Another option might be for the Court to affirm the lower Court’s determination regarding lack of standing but focus on giving guidance regarding the term ‘natural born citizen’. The Court could address the definitional issue because it is an issue of great public importance and is likely to be repeated/confronted in the future, referencing the possibility of Gov. Jindal running for President in 2012. (I believe Gov. Jindal was born in the United States but his parents were not.) This course of action would leave a bad taste for millions of Americans but would arm the States the necessary definition to ensure that the Constitution is enforced in the future. (For Justices appointed by Obama – recusal would be in order.) It would make the remainder of Obama’s term a nightmare – and if the Democrats in Congress did not investigate to ensure Obama’s eligibility they would be voted out of power for decades to come. This would be the Supreme Court punting the political issue to Congress. I wonder if the media truth assassins would cover it?

Thursday, July 22, 2010

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals Finds Attorney Apuzzo Not Liable for Obama’s/Congress’ Damages and Costs Incurred by Them in Defending the Kerchner Appeal

On July 2, 2010, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision affirming the New Jersey Federal District Court’s dismissal of the Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al case for lack of Article III standing. The Court ordered that I show cause in 14 days why the Court should not find me liable for just damages and costs suffered by the defendants, not in having to defend against the merits of plaintiffs’ underlying claims that Putative President Obama is not an Article II “natural born Citizen,” that he has yet to conclusively prove that he was born in Hawaii, that Congress failed to exercise its constitutional duty to properly vet and investigate Obama’s “natural born Citizen” status, and that former Vice President and President of the Senate, Dick Cheney, and current Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, were complicit in that Congressional failure, but rather in having to defendant against what the court considers to be a frivolous appeal of the District Court’s dismissal of their claims on the ground of Article III standing. On Monday, July 19, 2010, I filed my response. This afternoon, on July 22, 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision on whether it should impose the damages and costs upon me. The Court has decided not to impose any damages and costs upon me and has discharged its order to show cause. This means that the matter of damages and costs is closed. Here is the Court’s decision:

“ORDER (SLOVITER, BARRY and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges) On July 2, 2010, this Court filed an Order to Show Cause directing Appellants’ counsel to show cause in writing why he should not be subject to an Order pursuant to F.R.A.P. 38 for pursuing a frivolous appeal. In response, Mario Apuzzo filed a 95-page statement that contains, inter alia, numerous statements directed to the merits of this Court’s opinion, which the Court finds unpersuasive. His request that the Court reconsider its opinion is denied, as the appropriate procedure for that issue is through a Petition for Rehearing. However, based on Mr. Apuzzo’s explanation of his efforts to research the applicable law on standing, we hereby discharge the Order to Show Cause, filed. Sloviter, Authoring Judge. (PDB).”

I want to thank everyone who supported and encouraged me in this battle. This includes everyone who expressed their feelings on this matter through blog posts, articles, comments, and emails.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
July 22, 2010
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
###

http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/calling-all-patriots-stop-the-treason-campaign/

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/07/21/once-upon-a-crime-an-open-letter-to-america/

Journolist Truth Assassins –

Unfortunately, I don't have to make a big leap to believe something like this actually exists in the Obama White House basement! Especially after the discovery of the existance of the 'Journolist' Truth Assassins - Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, The Constitution, our freedoms, etc. all appear to be in the BOPAC Administration's and their friends' (State Run Media, Journolist, NAACP, Black Panthers, Ayers, Rev. Wright) sights.

I hope the military will also consider how much of the information regarding the ‘natural born citizen’ issue has been manipulated, emphasized, de-emphasized, vilified, ridiculed, and lied about by those in the sphere of influence of the ‘Journolist’ Truth Assassins!

More Hope & Change… Top Obama Adviser Participated on Journolist

Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, July 22, 2010, 11:09 PM
(Ed Driscoll)

The “Journolist” is a listserv comprised of several hundred top liberal journalists from influential American and British media outlets, as well as like-minded professors, union reps and activists. Leftist media hack and WaPo journalist Ezra Klein founded Journolist with far left crank Joe Klein from TIME magazine in February of 2007. Klein admitted that Journolist was an “insulated space where the lure of a smart, ongoing conversation would encourage journalists, policy experts and assorted other observers to share their insights with one another.” But, you had to be a leftist to join this group. It was an exclusive club. And, it grew to include 400 of the most prominent leftist American journalists who shared ideas and helped spin the far left narrative in the state-run media. This is where far left cranks colluded to spit out the DNC’s talking points and to defend President Barack Obama’s radical past and socialist agenda. Ezra Klein reportedly shut down Journolist on June 28, 2010 after leaks were reported. Andrew Breitbart announced recently that he would reward $100,000 to anyone who could provide the full “JournoList” archive, source fully protected.

Now we find out that one of Barack Obama’s top advisers was a member and participated on Journolist.
Jared Bernstein was an Obama economic adviser and member of Journolist.

The Volokh Conspiracy reported:

Jared Bernstein, chief economist for Vice President Joseph Biden, served in 2008 as an economic adviser to the Obama campaign. At the same time, he was a member of JournoList, the controversial progressive email list.

…Continue Reading

Commentary -

I'm Sure There Are Many Soldiers Living This Nightmare. It's Time For The Joint Chiefs of Staff to Step To The Plate and Support Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin! Don't Be Military Sheep.

In support of Lt. Col. Lakin’s courage in seeking the ‘Truth’ (and as a former In-Flight Tech in the Navy), I urge all who have served or have friends/family in the military to ask the following question of those currently serving.

Brothers and Sisters in the Military, when are you going to demand Obama establish that he is a Natural Born Citizen, eligible to serve as Commander In Chief?

The military is the only government organization that I continue to have respect for and it pains me criticize those serving. And I understand the consequences of challenging Obama’s eligibility directly, but the continuing attacks against our Constitution by the left cannot be allowed to pass without objection in some form or another. Acquiescence is not the only option.

Consider this please. What if every serviceman or woman went to his or her Chaplin, stated their concerns and provided the basic evidence (direct and circumstantial, links, former statements by NPR etc. indicating a Kenyan birth, etc., etc.) that would cause most reasonable persons to have legitimate questions about Obama’s lack of eligibility to serve and issue lawful orders? What if requests were made to each Chaplin instructing them to pass these concerns up the Chain of Command? Would there come a point, a number of requests that would cause the leadership to demand proof of eligibility?

Maybe military leadership could utilize the following provision?

§ 935. Art. 135. Courts of inquiry

(a) Courts of inquiry to investigate any matter may be convened by any person authorized to convene a general court-martial or by any other person designated by the Secretary concerned for that purpose, whether or not the persons involved have requested such an inquiry.

If the Oath to protect the Constitution is not important today, why don’t we just change the oath of allegiance to reflect our current level of commitment?

I, _______, do solemnly swear to protect ME and I will try to defend the Constitution as long as it doesn’t adversely impact the aforementioned ‘ME’.

Obama Dreams About Government Run Health Care, Larry Sinclair, Birth Certificates, Natural Born Citizens While America Lives in a Nightmare.

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Albert Einstein

Other News:

The Permanant Handout Herd is Leading America to Slaughter! Everyone Needs a Hand Up from Time to Time, but Expecting it to be a Permanent Fixture is Distructive to America!

SafeguardOurConstituion – Lt. Col. Lakin’s Site

The Post Email

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/07/21/once-upon-a-crime-an-open-letter-to-america/

United States Constitution

Official Disclosure – Just to be clear, my graphics depict almost all members of the BOPAC Administration as being full of crap. They do not actually look like turds – one needs special ‘full of crap’ glasses to be able to see the core of those who continually feed America BS. I treat everyone equally – when Glenn Beck goes off on those who reasonably question Obama’s eligibility, he gets a half-full of crap depiction.

Tags:birther, CitizenWells, Courts of Inquiry, Ed Driscoll, Ezra Klein, General Vallely, Hector Maldonado, Impeach Obama, Jared Bernstein, Jim Hoft, Joe Klein, Journolist, Kerchner, Lt. Col. Lakin, Major General Jerry Ralph Curry, Mario Apuzzo, Military Oath, Natural Born Citizen, Obama Birth Certificate, Talk to Solomon Show, The Volokh Conspiracy, Unlawful Orders
Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

99% of Health Insurance Companies Have 2 to 3 Years of Viability Left – RUSH LIMBAUGH Insurance Caller – Kerchner v Obama – CitizenWells – Ji’Obama’had – 9/11 Mastermind to be Freed from GITMO – The BOPAC Report

March 24, 2010

The BOPAC Report

Obama’s Health Care Deform –

The Permanant Handout Herd is Leading America to Slaughter! Everyone Needs a Hand Up from Time to Time, but Expecting it to be a Permanent Fixture is Distructive to America!

VERY IMPORTANT

Yesterday I heard a Rush Limbaugh called who I have heard several times on his show. She is an insurance company insider and the beginning of the media screw up saying Rush would move to Costa Rica if Health Care Deform passed. He (in context) said he would seek medical treatment in Costa Rica.

This is a long interview so I urge you to listen to it. Rush’s caller’s comments reflect the TRUE intention of this legislation and what we all need to question at every TOWNHALL over the Easter Break. This is powerful ammunition.

The caller makes reference to an industry term, the 65-45 rule, that needs some clarification. If you add these numbers, they add up to 110 percent. I think the answer is that each number can vary a few percentage points but the total can’t be more than 100%. Maybe the rule represents the outside limits? Maybe the numbers reflect some things that apply to both. Bureaucracies work in mysterious ways. I hope Rush will clarify this.

This is very important for everyone to be aware of.

This Obama Care will cause a 100 to 200 percent insurance rate increases are coming in January 2011 (past the election).

Most insurance companies will be out of business in 2 to 3 years.

Stacy, Our EIB Insurance Expert

March 23, 2010

Listen To It! WMP | RealPlayer

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Stacy in hiding… is this our insurance babe? Stacy, welcome back. Great to have you here.

CALLER: Hey, Rush.

RUSH: Do you know you have gotten me into so much fun hot water?

CALLER: I know, I’ve heard!

RUSH: Do you know how you did that?

CALLER: I did by coming on about Costa Rica.

RUSH: You came on and you told me that your insurance company was setting up medical operations in Costa Rica, you’re going to take the doctors and everything down there and you’re going to sell insurance policies if this thing all happened to your customers, and included in the premium would be trips to Costa Rica for medical treatment and so forth. So after having heard you say that, another caller asked me, “What are you going to do if it passes?” “I’m going to go get treated in Costa Rica.” And so now everybody thinks I said I’m leaving the country for Costa Rica. So I need to ask you, how soon are you going to get those clinics set up so I can go?

CALLER: Well, I’m afraid that even that’s not going to save us.

RUSH: Oh, no.

CALLER: I’ve gotta revise my estimate. We may last two to three years, tops, and let me tell you why. The 85-15 provision that has just been signed into law an hour ago –

RUSH: Yeah?

CALLER: — by definition of every state and federal insurance regulator makes us financially unsound.

RUSH: All right, now, I have to take a break here and I want to ask you if you can hold on ’til the top of the next hour where we will get your details on this without any time constraints. Can you hang on?

CALLER: I’ll skip a bit of a meeting, sure.

RUSH: You tell ‘em it will be worth it.

CALLER: Okay.

RUSH: Tell ‘em it will be worth it, and if you can’t, you tell Snerdley and we’ll call you back when you have time, okay?

CALLER: Okay, thank you, dear.

RUSH: You bet.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now, we welcome back from “in hiding” in Atlanta Stacy, who works for an insurance company who’s been keeping us updated throughout this past year on the fate of her industry should this thing pass. Now it has passed. Give us the lowdown, Stacy.

CALLER: Um, we’re going to make it two years, three tops.

RUSH: Explain why and start at the beginning.

CALLER: Okay. For time immemorial, both state and federal regulation — and also just the industry standard — has been a 65-45 percentage arrangement: 65 in claims payment and 45 for administration and claims expense. Withholding that you store for, you know, a major catastrophe or something.

RUSH: This is to pay your claims?

CALLER: No, 65% is to pay the claims. Forty-five percent is for everything else.

RUSH: That means 45% is salaries, administration costs, and the offices, all the paperwork, that kind of thing?

CALLER: It’s that as well as, you know, we are required to keep a certain amount of cash on hand as a percentage of our claims exposure to pay claims.

RUSH: I got you.

CALLER: So, for example, if you have a disaster and you suddenly had 400,000 claims come in, you’ve gotta have the money to be able to pay those claims immediately.

RUSH: Now, I just want to make sure I understand here. State and federal regulations set those percentages?

CALLER: State and federal regulations, yes.

RUSH: So if you wanted to have 85% set aside for claims, you couldn’t. You had to go at 65%?

CALLER: Exactly.

RUSH: If you wanted 30% set aside for claims and the rest were administration, you couldn’t do it. It had to be 65%.

CALLER: That’s illegal, yes. It has to be 65-45, and there’s a couple of percentage either way, but generally when an insurance company falls outside of those guidelines, they are considered financially unstable.

RUSH: Well, who audits you all to make sure you are within the ratio?

CALLER: We’re audited by the state insurance departments, primarily. There are some plans that are audited both state and federally, and then you have your private auditors who will come in as part of the stock market and that kind of thing. So we’re audited often.

RUSH: How often do these audits take place?

CALLER: At least once a year, you’ll have one from the industry auditors, and every three to five perhaps for federal and state.

RUSH: Okay.

CALLER: More often if they think that you’re unstable, they’ll audit you more often. So what Obama just did an hour and a half ago is make every insurance company in the country financially unstable. Remember, the 15% (sic) that we are left has not only to pay salaries, maintenance, upkeep of buildings; it also has to pay the 40% increased taxes that we’ve got. I mean, there’s just no way. You can’t do it.

RUSH: Well, you’re getting a little bit ahead of me here. What did Obama sign that changes this 65-45 split? In what way did Obama now sign you into permanent instability?

CALLER: The provision in the Senate bill requires that all insurance companies pay 85% of premiums collected every year in claims.

RUSH: So the 65 is now 85?

CALLER: Exactly. It doesn’t matter how much we increase the premium, it won’t matter.

RUSH: And just to satisfy my own curiosity, with the mandates that are in this — such as you now being required to insure children on their parents’ policies to age 26 or 27; and now having to insure (or cover) preexisting conditions — what’s that going to do to your current premium structure starting today?

CALLER: That’s my other fear, Rush. I don’t know that November is as big a lock as we would hope and here’s why. Most group plans renew January 1st of every year. Most people won’t see the dramatic premium increases until January 1st. So what they’re going to do is all these people who voted for this — and who likely were swayed by this argument — are going to run around and say, “Well, look, nothing happened. You’re not paying any more. You know, everything’s fine. It was just a bunch of, quote, unquote, ‘fearmongering,’” and I’m afraid they’re going to be reelected.

RUSH: Well, we’ll do with that when the time comes. I think there’s a lot more in this than just those two provisions that have people outraged and upset, and I know that your fear is that the people that supported this are going to show up in droves and vote for Democrats on the theory that none of the scare stories that were told had happened because this delayed until January, but there are other things that we can work with on this. The Democrat Party’s damaged itself in the sense. They just inflicted great harm on the country. Whenever it shows up, it will be realized. Now, I want to take you back to the first thing you said: You originally thought that your industry would survive. You’re speaking industry or just your particular company?

CALLER: I would say 99% of all insurance companies, health insurance companies in the country.

RUSH: Okay. So you originated thought you might have three to five years to stay in business under Obama. Now you said it’s two to three. Why?

CALLER: Because of the 85-15. Plus the additional expenses we’re gonna incur. Additionally, the mandates, what people don’t understand when CMS (which is the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare) push a mandate down on insurance companies, we have to pay to complement those mandates. We don’t know how many of those are in this monstrosity. So we can have our mandate budget doubled, our taxes already up 40% or whatever it is, and our cash flow immediately cut.

RUSH: Well, how can you know in advance of paying any claims? Because they’ve now shifted to 65% that you have to set aside for claims to 85%. How in the world can anybody know in advance of paying claims that it’s going to amount to 85%?

CALLER: Well –

RUSH: Of course 65%? It seems to be like this is a ridiculous dictate made by people that have no clue how your business works.

CALLER: Well, they don’t have a clue. But the way that that amount of money is calculated is you look at the past year, past five years, past ten years, and you see what your claims expense have been those years. Then based on your enrollment and your demographics you project forward into what you expect to be paying in the future, in the next year and the next five years. So you can do that. It’s not precise to a dollar, but you usually get pretty close. What he’s done is by saying, for example, the preventative services now –

RUSH: Those are free. Those are, quote, unquote, “free.”

CALLER: Yeah, exactly.

RUSH: What the hell is a preventative service covered by an insurance company anyway?

CALLER: Well, that would be your colonoscopies, your mammograms, your yearly physicals, your lab work.

RUSH: Oh, so those are free now! So if I want to go get a colonoscopy today and I have an insurance policy, I’m not going to pay for it?

CALLER: Exactly.

RUSH: But you will.

CALLER: Well, we will. We’ll pay out the nose for it.

RUSH: (laughing) Well…

CALLER: I know, bad analogy. I’m sorry.

RUSH: It is Christmas!

CALLER: (giggling) But, Rush –

RUSH: Well, no, I don’t look at a colonoscopy as Christmas. Don’t misunderstand.

CALLER: (giggling)

RUSH: But it is Christmas in the sense that I’m not paying for it. I don’t know how you can stay in business even two to three years with this kind of thing happening to you this year alone.

CALLER: I don’t think we will and that’s why I am seriously considering leaving this industry. I’m updating my resume. You know, people who I work with — even people who voted for Obama and thought he was the greatest thing since sliced bread — are shell-shocked.

RUSH: That just frustrates the hell out of me. Anybody with a brain has no reason to be shell-shocked about who this guy is, but it is what it is.

CALLER: Rush, it’s not him. I didn’t think Congress would sell us down the river like this, especially given the public opinion. When have you ever seen a politician just say, “I don’t care that the public doesn’t like it and I don’t care if I’m reelected”? This is something I have never experienced. I have never seen this, and people that I work with who don’t follow politics, who don’t know what’s going on necessarily, they had no clue this was coming. At least I had an inkling! They had no idea.

RUSH: Well, it’s proof positive is that people who don’t pay attention to politics are now outraged, upset, and don’t quite understand. It’s time to make ‘em understand. This is who Democrats are. This is who liberals are. You realize, too, I’m sure, that the whole purpose of all these new requirements on you is to put you out of business.

CALLER: Oh, absolutely.

RUSH: The whole purpose is to make it unable for you to stay in business financially, and so the government can come in and say, “Okay, well, you know, these damn insurance companies! We never could depend on them. They’re nothing but a bunch of frauds and nothing but a bunch of cheats. They’re still cheating people. They’re still raping people. We’re going to have to do this ourselves.”

CALLER: And you know how many people are going to die in the interim, Rush? I say that in all sincerity, because come January 1st you’re going to see 200, 300% increases in premiums and people are going to drop their coverage. So you’ve got the woman who isn’t going to go get the mammogram or the man who’s not going to get the prostate exam.

RUSH: Wait a minute!

CALLER: People are going to die.

RUSH: I thought the mammogram was free.

CALLER: Not when you drop the coverage because you can’t afford three times the premium. Remember, the premiums are going up because of the government, and jobs are being lost because of the government. If you can’t pay it, you can’t pay it. So people are going to drop it. They’re going to drop their insurance before they drop their mortgage.

RUSH: They’re going to be clamoring to the government to fix the mean-spirited insurance companies for raising the prices so high and that’s where Obama’s going to step in and say, “You know what? We have no choice here but than to do it ourselves,” and then you get dumped on again first and foremost with Obama portraying the government as the savior. Look, I gotta take a break. Can you hang on a couple minutes?

CALLER: Sure.

RUSH: I still have a couple more questions. Stacy, our insurance expert, “hiding” in Atlanta to make the call.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: We rejoin Stacy in hiding in Atlanta from the insurance industry. You said just a minute ago that you’re not all that confident about the November election because all these premium increases, group rates, group policy don’t renew ’til January so all of your out-of-pocket expenses are going to start relatively soon but you can’t raise premiums until January to recoup them, correct?

CALLER: Correct.

RUSH: All right, we just got a story here from The Politico: “Timing Right for Democrats’ Midterm Election Hopes — Voters will get their first taste of the benefits of health care reform only a few short weeks before the November midterm elections. They won’t have to swallow most of the bitter pills until much later — well after President Barack Obama faces voters again in 2012. Match the effective dates of key reform provisions against the election calendar, and it becomes clear that Democrats were as focused on writing a legislative overhaul of the health care system as they were on devising a political road map for selling it to voters.” Now, of course, this story is celebrating the brilliance of the Democrats here. Basically this story is, “Okay, yep, Americans you got screwed, but you’re not going to know it in time to vote the Democrats out,” which is essentially your fear.

CALLER: Yeah, and, you know, Rush, Costa Rica is not going to save us because it doesn’t matter where services are rendered, the law is going to cover any policy sold within the United States. So even though we can send folks down to Costa Rica for care, we’re still going to be under the 85-15 rule, we’re still going to have the additional taxes.

RUSH: Look, all this is academic. You’re not going to be in business.

CALLER: I don’t think it is. That’s why I’m leaving it.

RUSH: Are you the only one that realizes this in your immediate orb within your company?

CALLER: No. Most of us recognize it. The question is, are you willing to move out of state, you know, go somewhere else to find a comparable job, that’s the question now for a lot of us.

RUSH: What comparable job?

CALLER: The technology aspect. The technology that we work with is not used commonly in small shops around or whatever.

RUSH: Yeah.

CALLER: So if we want a position using the technology we use today, we’re going to have to leave, and I don’t know where I’m going to go.

RUSH: Well, it’s a shame. And it’s a shame because all of this was predictable based on the details of the legislation. Stacy, feel free to stay in touch any time to update us on this. We really do value your input on this. You sound very confident and know what you’re talking about. Well, in fact, you know what, Snerdley has a great idea and we’re going to do this. We are going to start collecting our own sob stories, and Stacy you might want to be one of our sob stories. Instead of bringing up individuals who have supposedly been treated harshly because of an unfair country and an unfair insurance industry what we’re going to do is create our own roster of sob story people, small businesses who have been put out of business; small business people whose taxes have been raised making it impossible to stay in business for very much longer; people like you, whose entire industry is being targeted for eventual destruction. We’re going to do people genuinely hurt by the legislation. And believe me, there will be no shortage. If you want to be one of our sob stories, I hope you’re not, but if a sob story happens to you, we, the EIB Network, will happily be your outlet.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: So I got this e-mail question from the subscriber list: “After listening to Stacy, why aren’t the insurance companies not taking out full-page ads detailing all of these deceptive lies to the American people? Why are Wall Street companies not doing the same? Why are they continuing to allow these liberals to demonize them and not fight back?” I can only take a guess, and as far as the insurance companies are concerned, take a look at the stocks. Insurance company stocks right now are skyrocketing and so are drug company stocks because the original few years of this bill mandates 32 million more customers, and the insurance companies are going to pay for them somehow, some way, so they’re excited about this. You jump in on the bubble and you cash out. I mean, even if you think you got five years left in business, maximize it all you can and then get the hell out if you don’t think you can stop it. Anyway, my guess. What do I know?

END TRANSCRIPT

Natural Born Citizen Issue –

Obama Dreams About Government Run Health Care, Larry Sinclair, Birth Certificates, Natural Born Citizens While America Lives in a Nightmare.

CitizenWells has another update about the Kerchner v Obama lawsuit. CitizenWells – I hope you will study the transcript from Rush Limbaugh’s show and forward it to those who can verify and clarify.

Kerchner v Obama and Congress, Update, March 24, 2010, Charles Kerchner comments on Appellant’s Reply Brief, Mario Apuzzo attorney

March 24, 2010 ·

Kerchner v Obama and Congress, Update, March 24, 2010, Charles Kerchner comments

From Charles Kerchner, lead plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama and Congress.

“For immediate release – 23 March 2010

Commander Kerchner’s comments on the Appellant’s Reply Brief filed today by Atty Apuzzo in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress Lawsuit Appeal

By now many of you have likely had time to read Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s outstanding Appellant’s Reply Brief filed today with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA. The closing two paragraphs sum up the issues and consequences and the duty of the federal court’s role in resolving the core constitutional legal question of this lawsuit very well. Imo, Atty Apuzzo’s words will live in history. The federal courts must take this case or our Constitutional Republic is doomed and on its way to the scrap heaps of history.

Atty Apuzzo writes on pages 29 & 30:
—————————————-
“The Supreme Court has warned us what can happen to our republic if its government does not observe the laws of the land. …Continue Reading

Ji’Obama’had –

When I served in the Navy, I understood that I was risking my life for Freedom, Liberty and the Constitution. I would not have joined if I were defending socialism. Have our most revered sacrificed all in vain? Not yet but we are getting close.

9/11 Mastermind To Be Freed From Guantanamo

Last Updated: Tue, 03/23/2010 – 3:16pm

A federal judge has ordered the Al Qaeda operative who recruited most of the 9/11 terrorists to be released from Guantanamo Bay prison though he is considered a “high value detainee” by the U.S.

The perplexing decision has been classified so there is no explanation why U.S. District Judge James Robertson granted the habeas corpus petition of Mohamedou Slahi, an Osama bin Laden confidant who is considered among the worst terrorists held at the military prison since the nation was brutally attacked nearly a decade ago.
It marks the 34th time that a U.S. judge frees a Guantanamo terrorist since the Supreme Court ruled that detainees could challenge their incarceration in federal court. Slahi arrived at the military compound in 2002 and claims he was tortured, threatened with death, sleep deprived and moved around the base blindfolded.

Slahi’s terrorist activities are extensive and detailed in the 9/11 Commission report, which explains how he recruited four of the September 2001 conspirators from the renowned Hamburg Germany cell. They include Mohammed Atta, Marwan al Shehhi, and Ziad Jarrah, the suicide pilots of American Airlines Flight 11, United Airlines Flight 175, and United Airlines Flight 93….Continue Reading

Tags:65-45 Insurance Rule, 85-15 Provision, Al Qaeda, Apuzzo, Birth Certificate, CitizenWells, Costa Rica, Easter, Gitmo, Guantonamo, Health Care Deform, Health Care Reform, House of Representative, Ji'Obama'had, Kerchner, Larry Sinclair, Mohamedou Slahi, Natural Born Citizen, Obama Care, Pelosi, Reid, Senate
Posted in 1 | 1 Comment »

Providence- is it God or government? Dr. Keyes – Ji’Obama’had – Obama’s Legacy and the Iranian Bomb – Dershowitz – The Handout Herd – IRS is Coming to Steal From YOU! Ron Paul – Kerchner & Apuzzo – CitizenWells – The BOPAC Report

March 23, 2010

The BOPAC Report

2010 Year of the Turdnado –

As Aretha Franklin says: You better think, think, think what you do to me! Can you hear this message? If you voted yes on Obama's Socialist takeover of health care, don't say you haven't been warned.

Dr. Alan Keyes is a true American hero and all around great guy!

Providence- is it God or government?

March 22, 2010

Between now and the midterm elections in November, the battle for the constitutional liberty of the American people will be decided. From day one, Obama’s behavior and that of his factional cohorts, has confirmed that the “change” they intend to impose on the United States is a change of regime- from a constitutional government that recognizes and respects the sovereignty of the people to an elite party dictatorship that imposes its will regardless of their consent.

Though some are still blind enough to believe that Obama is the cause and focus of this battle, others are finally waking up to the reality that Obama is simply an historical figurehead. He embodies the spirit of elite domination that transcends contemporary lines of party and ideological division. As that astute observer of history Alexis de Tocqueville realized, the United States of America emerged as part of a general movement in which the people as a whole challenged the rule by domineering elites that had been the invariable pattern for government throughout human history. Tocqueville thought that the special circumstances of the Americans, with respect to geography and politics (in the broadest sense), as well as moral and intellectual character, made their assertion of self-government the most promising salient of this democratic movement, which is to say the most likely to produce a stable result, reasonably consistent with justice and basic human decency. Something of the outward luster of human ambition would be lost, but the general material and spiritual contentment of humanity would be well served.

It’s fair to say that until the present day the results far exceeded Tocqueville’s expectations. Keep in mind that Tocqueville was no cheerleader for democracy. He understood its inherent dangers, including especially tendencies that combined the dissolution of natural social institutions (like the family) with a taste for the concentration of political power. This portended a gradual elimination of intermediary human agencies, which would leave isolated individuals helplessly subject to the irresistible power of one pervasive and controlling tyrannical power. Tocqueville saw hope for democracy in America precisely because the religious character, and the social and political habits of its people, worked to mitigate democracy’s decline toward tyranny.…Continue Reading

Ji’Obama’had –

Teleprompter holds Whitehouse Protocol Classes. Will Obama bow at Larry Sinclair's meet and greet in Florida?

Is Obama Neville Chamberlain?

MARCH 23, 2010

Obama’s Legacy and the Iranian Bomb

Neville Chamberlain was remembered for appeasing Germany, not his progressive social programs.

By ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ

The gravest threat faced by the world today is a nuclear-armed Iran. Of all the nations capable of producing nuclear weapons, Iran is the only one that might use them to attack an enemy.

There are several ways in which Iran could use nuclear weapons. The first is by dropping an atomic bomb on Israel, as its leaders have repeatedly threatened to do. Hashemi Rafsanjani, a former president of Iran, boasted in 2004 that an Iranian attack would kill as many as five million Jews. Mr. Rafsanjani estimated that even if Israel retaliated with its own nuclear bombs, Iran would probably lose about 15 million people, which he said would be a small “sacrifice” of the billion Muslims in the world.

The second way in which Iran could use nuclear weapons would be to hand them off to its surrogates, Hezbollah or Hamas. A third way would be for a terrorist group, such as al Qaeda, to get its hands on Iranian nuclear material. It could do so with the consent of Iran or by working with rogue elements within the Iranian regime.

Finally, Iran could use its nuclear weapons without ever detonating a bomb. By constantly threatening Israel with nuclear annihilation, it could engender so much fear among Israelis as to incite mass immigration, a brain drain, or a significant decline in people moving to Israel.

These are the specific ways in which Iran could use nuclear weapons, primarily against the Jewish state. But there are other ways in which a nuclear-armed Iran would endanger the world…Continue Reading

ObamaCare(Mess) –

The Permanant Handout Herd is Leading America to Slaughter! Everyone Needs a Hand Up from Time to Time, but Expecting it to be a Permanent Fixture is Distructive to America!

The following article lays out the reality that the Handout Herd wants you to ignore. I don’t agree with everything Mr. Jones says but the name of his site does reflect the direction America is heading.

From Alex Jones’ Prison Planet:

Ron Paul: IRS Will Steal More Money To Fund Health Care

Only thing that will repeal Obamacare will be bankruptcy of the United States, warns Congressman

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, March 22, 2010

Texas Congressman Ron Paul warns that last night’s passage of the health care reform bill will prompt the government to hire thousands of new IRS agents who will be used to steal money from taxpaying Americans to fund the new program.

Paul also told Fox News that the passage of Obamacare will only be repealed once the United States enters bankruptcy as a result of its exploding national deficit and runaway spending.

“Any time a government tries to give you a service or something of substance, they have to steal it from somebody else, so the whole process is immoral because it’s based on government theft, that’s why they’re hiring 16,000 more new IRS agents, because they have to steal more money,” stated the Congressman, referring to an analysis by the Joint Economic Committee and the House Ways & Means Committee that found “Up to 16,500 new IRS personnel will be needed to collect, examine and audit new tax information mandated on families and small businesses,” under the health care bill.

Paul said that the passage of Obamacare will precipitate a deepening of the economic crisis that will be “defined by the destruction of the dollar,” meaning government won’t be able to pay for anything….Continue Reading

Natural Born Citizen Issue –

Just like Obama is not Malcolm X - Obama is not a "Natural Born Citizen"! Obama may look like Malcolm X and Obama may be a "Citizen"; but being a "Citizen" does not necessarily mean that Obama is a "Natural Born Citizen"! Joint Chiefs of Staff’s new mottos: Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil & Don’t rock the boat!

Good Luck Commander!

Update from CitizenWells:

Kerchner v Obama, Update, March 23, 2010, Appeal Reply Brief and Request for Oral Argument, Charles Kerchner, Attorney Mario Apuzzo

March 23, 2010

Kerchner v Obama, Update, March 23, 2010

I received this a few hours ago from Charles Kerchner, lead plantiff in Kerchner v Obama and Congress.

“Kerchner v Obama Appeal Reply Brief and Oral Argument Request Filed
I have completed filing the Kerchner Reply Brief and Request for Oral Argument. These documents may be accessed at the indicated links. All parties have completed filing all briefs and now we just need a decision from the Court. We will now wait and see if the Third Circuit Court of Appeals grants my request for oral argument and if so when the oral argument will be. If oral argument is granted, it will take place at the United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The courthouse is located right across the street from Independence Hall and the Liberty Bell….Continue Reading

Tags:Alex Jones, Apuzzo, CitizenWells, Dershowitz, Dr. Keyes, Iranian Bomb, Ji'Obama'had, Kerchner, Larry Sinclair, Neville Chamberlain, Nuclear Bomb, Ron Paul, The BOPAC Report
Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

Immunity Granted in Navy Seals Persecution – State Stimulus Crutch – Tea Party Health Care Takeover Protest on Saturday in DC – Obama Care – Mark Levin Lawsuit Coming – Jack Cafferty Calls Obama a Liar – CitizenWells – The BOPAC Report

March 18, 2010

The BOPAC Report

Navy Seals Prosecution –

Coddling Terrorists, Persecuting Navy Seals and CIA, Socialist Takeover of Industry, Political Correctness Allowing Ft. Hood Massacre – Will this be the next thing we see from Obama and Eric Holder?

Sorry I have been remiss in reporting on this vital military issue – the unjust prosecution of our Navy Seals.

From USNavySeals.com:

Judge Orders Immunity for SEAL Witnesses!

Posted March 13th, 2010 by USNavySeals

A key event took place Friday in the assault charges that were brought about against three Navy SEALs. In a previous post, we shared how the request for immunity of five potential witnesses who will give testimonies that will support Navy SEALs Matthew McCabe, Julio Huertas and Jonathan Keefe was denied.

On Friday, however, Cmdr. Tierney Carlos, the military judge who is hearing the case against Julio Huertas, said that the witnesses will be able to provide testimony that may place the allegations brought by a guard who said he witnessed McCabe punch Abed in doubt. Carlos ruled that “not granting them immunity… is either an attempt to gain tactical advantage over the defense or showed the government was overreaching”….Continue Reading

ObamaNomics &

States Stimulus Crutch –

Obamanomics - It's a Crap Shoot!

This is a story you will be seeing a lot of in the months ahead. It also explains why Obama has been hoarding the bulk of stimulus money. Democrats want to prop up union dominated State governments until after 2010 elections.

From the Baltimore Sun:

Cut spending now

Maryland GOP delegates’ plan would dig deep to balance budget, avoid future tax hikes

By Anthony J. O’Donnell and Christopher B. Shank

March 18, 2010

Maryland’s budget deficit is a long-term problem that requires a long-term solution. Over the past three years, the O’Malley/Brown administration has made little to no progress in addressing the state’s budget deficit.

Increased spending, a failed slots bill, the largest tax increase in our state’s history and federal bailouts make for a dismal track record. The Department of Legislative Services projects a cumulative deficit of more than $8 billion for the years 2012-2015 – $1,428 for every person in Maryland – yet Gov. Martin O’Malley has yet to offer a long-term plan to deal with this crisis. Next year, when federal stimulus funding runs out, the day of reckoning will arrive, and the taxpayers will be handed the bill. If we don’t reverse this trend, we are headed for yet another massive tax increase. …Continue Reading

Tea Party Health Care Takeover Protests –

ObamaCare - Stand in Line and have a Czar Control Your Doctor! Sen. Lieberman stands tall!

Tea Partiers refuse to go away

By Mike Riggs 03/18/10 at 6:25 AM

Alex Pappas in with an update on those resilient health-care protestors:

We covered the Tea Partier’s “Last Hurrah” extensively this week with their storming of the halls of the Congress on Tuesday, but it looks like they’ll be hitting the Hill again this weekend.

Tea Party Patriots will gather for a brief rally on Capitol Hill Saturday at 10 a.m. before dividing up to walk the halls of congress. ….Continue Reading

Natural Born Citizen –

Eligibility lawyer says ‘standing’ a no-brainer

‘How can you deny he’s affecting me?’

Posted: March 17, 2010

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

An attorney handling one of the appellate level challenges to Barack Obama’s occupancy of the White House – under the dispute that involves the Constitution’s demand presidents be a “natural born citizen” and Obama’s unwillingness to document that – says the most common reason judges have used for dismissing cases is just wrong.

Most of the dozens of cases that have been filed over Obama’s eligibility have been dismissed by judges who have cited a lack of “standing” on the part of the plaintiffs. In fact, the government’s most recent filing in the case being handled by Mario Apuzzo argues almost exclusively that it should be dismissed for that reason.

But Apuzzo, whose case is pending before the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and in which he will file a further brief within the next few days, says the federal standard for having standing – a concrete and particularized injury potential imminent for an individual – should be a no-brainer for judges.

“How can you deny he’s affecting me?” he asked during an interview with WND. “He wants to have terror trials in New York. He published the CIA interrogation techniques. On and on. He goes around bowing and doing all these different things. His statements we’re not a Christian nation; we’re one of the largest Muslim nations. It’s all there.” …Continue Reading

ObamaCare –

Well Maybe Obama's Obamacare will save money? But it will suck to be old!

There’s hope that this crap can be defeated. Everyone needs to call, march, honk, email, shout Hell No!

Stephen Lynch warns on health vote

Says procedural move would hurt Congress

By Jay Fitzgerald
Thursday, March 18, 2010

Even one of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s floor whips, U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch, says a proposed parliamentary move to pass health-care reform would be “disingenuous” and harm the credibility of Congress.

In a sign of how tough it’s been for Pelosi to round up votes for the massive bill, Lynch – a South Boston Democrat who supported a House reform package last year – said he’ll probably vote against a key Senate version of the legislation, unless unexpected major changes are made soon.

Lynch, who serves as one of Pelosi’s key vote counters, said he also can’t support a proposed “deem and pass” procedure that would allow Democrats to vote to strip out controversial portions of the Senate bill and then “deem” that the entire package has passed without a second, direct vote….Continue Reading

If Democrats use dishonest method to pass this socialist takeover, there will be millions engaged to say hell no.

Idaho first to sign law aimed at health care plan

By JOHN MILLER (AP) – 13 hours ago

BOISE, Idaho — Idaho took the lead in a growing, nationwide fight against health care overhaul Wednesday when its governor became the first to sign a measure requiring the state attorney general to sue the federal government if residents are forced to buy health insurance.

Similar legislation is pending in 37 other states….Continue Reading

I knew we would be able to count on Mark Levin!

From American Spectator:

Mark Levin Readies Lawsuit on Slaughter Rule

By Jeffrey Lord on 3.18.10 @ 6:08AM

Not so fast.

Democrats poised to use the so-called “deem and pass” strategy to force through a health care bill will have to deal with Mark Levin first.

Levin, known to his fans as one of the most popular talk show hosts in the country, is also both a legal scholar and longtime president of the Landmark Legal Foundation, a nonprofit, public interest law firm A former chief of staff to Reagan Attorney General Edwin Meese III, Levin is the author of two New York Times bestselling books on the Constitution and the judiciary, the last, Liberty and Tyranny, at number one for a dozen weeks.

The lawsuit will name President Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder and “other relevant cabinet members” as defendants. Those cabinet members are Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

Levin’s goal? To stop the government from “instituting this unconstitutional contrivance.” … Continue Reading

And from Michelle Malkin:

CBO: Covering the Backsides of Obamacare-pushers?

By Michelle Malkin • March 18, 2010 09:13 AM

The CBO scoring of the House Demcare bill that the American people have not seen will be released this morning.

The poor number-crunchers have been working overtime as Speaker Pelosi and the Dems have re-jiggered and re-jiggered to meet farcical fiscal discipline goals. It’s Enron-style accounting and everyone knows it.

James Capretta at The Corner breaks it down:

The Washington Post reports today that CBO now says the latest version of the Democratic plan will no longer cut the deficit as the Democrats have claimed. That’s not surprising. To buy votes, they are upping the subsidies in the exchanges, expanding the Medicare prescription-drug benefit, delaying the Cadillac tax, and buying off countless members with other assorted and unseen deals (where are the C-SPAN cameras when you really need them?). Little wonder that even their phony deficit-reduction claims have now evaporated.

But the game is not over. Even now, they are going back to CBO with another bag full of tricks….

…Continue Reading

ChiBama Politics –

As Aretha Franklin says: You better think

Can this be true? Jack Cafferty? Wow! Watch out for 2010 Turdnados near Washington D.C. “Voters remember this crap for mid term elections” From CitizenWells:

Obama a liar, CNN, Jack Cafferty, Obamacare, Health Care Bill, Secret negotiations, Obama pledged openness, Campaign promise lies, Nancy Pelosi lied in 2006, Voters remember this crap for mid term elections

March 18, 2010 ·

Obama a liar, CNN, Jack Cafferty, Obamacare, Health Care Bill

Jack Cafferty on CNN calls Obama a liar.

“CNN – Liar in the White House”… Continue Reading

Other Team FOCOA News –

(Full of Crap Obama Administration)

Generic Congressional Ballot

Republicans Lead Democrats by 10 in Generic Ballot, Highest Lead Yet

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Tags:2010 Elections, American Spectator, Baltimore Sun, Birthers, CBO, CitizenWells, Cmdr. Tierney Carlos, CNN, Gov. Martin O'Malley, Health Care Reform, Idaho legal action, Immunity, Jack Cafferty, James Capretta, Kerchner, Mario Apuzzo, Mark Levin, Michelle Malkin, Natural Born Citizen, Navy Seals Prosecution, ObamaCare, Pelosi, SEIU, Slaughter Rule, Stimulus funding, Tea Baggers, Tea Party, Turdnado, Unions, USNavySeals.com
Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

CitizenWells Announcement – Larry Sinclair – Help Get Him On Ballot – HillBuzz Revelation – Mario Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner on WGTK 970 Sunday – Second Amendment Wyoming – WND – The BOPAC Report

March 13, 2010

The BOPAC Report

Second Amendment –

Pretty soon only the tyrannical members of our government and criminals will be the ones with guns! Protect the Second Amendment to the Constitution with everything you have!

Every State needs to stand up if they want to have any say about how to live their lives. Good for Wyoming.

State plan fines feds $2,000 over gun rules

2 years in jail also possible for agent enforcing U.S. regulations on firearm

Posted: March 13, 2010
12:20 am Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Wyoming has joined a growing list of states with self-declared exemptions from federal gun regulation of weapons made, bought and used inside state borders – but lawmakers in the Cowboy State have taken the issue one step further, adopting significant penalties for federal agents attempting to enforce Washington’s rules.

According a law signed into effect yesterday by Democratic Gov. Dave Freudenthal, any agent of the U.S. who “enforces or attempts to enforce” federal gun rules on a “personal firearm” in Wyoming faces a felony conviction and a penalty of up to two years in prison and up to $2,000 in fines. …Continue Reading

Natural Born Citizen –

Announcement from Mario Apuzzo – Maybe he will design a tie clip to wear similar to the one above.

Friday, March 12, 2010

Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner will be on Les Naiman Show, WGTK 970, Louisville KY, hosted by Les Naiman, Sunday 14 Mar 2010 10:30 PM EST

Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner will be the featured guests on the Les Naiman radio show, WGTK 970 in Louisville KY, hosted by Les Naiman, on Sunday, 14 March 2010, 10:30 PM EST. Some topics to be discussed:

~The defendant’s (Obama & Congress et al) Opposition Brief recently filed with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA for the Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al lawsuit and the forthcoming appellant’s (Kerchner et al) Reply Brief.
~Continuing efforts by the Plaintiffs to educate the public and promote knowledge about the merits and constitutional legal issues involved in this lawsuit in the national print media via full page ads placed in the Washington Times National Weekly edition. See examples at: http://www.protectourliberty.org …Continue Reading

Awakenings –

Both my parents were Democrats. However they would not recognize what has happened to their Party. The folks a Hill Buzz have made a hard but necessary decision. Where are the ‘centrist Democrats’ reclaiming their Party? Today’s Democratic Party is not a Party to debate with – it’s a Party to STOP!

If you are reading this, you are the Resistance

Posted by hillbuzz under Uncategorized

It’s a very emotional day here at Buzzquarters.

Not sure what triggered it, but we fully accept today that the current government in Washington is completely mad and hellbent on destroying this country.

We do not believe it’s possible for the Left to ram their Healthcare Rationing bill through Congress, but we believe they will indeed try every insane trick they can conjure to attempt it.

Absolute all-out political war needs to be declared on every Democrat in office if they do not rise up against the madness of their own party and put a stop to this immediately.

A national, coast-to-coast, Resistance needs to form and mobilize in this country, rising up from the Tea Party movement itself and take back this government at the ballot box in November….Continue Reading

Larry Sinclair’s Journey –

Obama Dreams About Government Run Health Care, Larry Sinclair, Birth Certificates, Natural Born Citizens While America Lives in a Nightmare.

Special Announcement from CitizenWells about Larry Sinclair!

Larry Sinclair for Congress, Update, March 13, 2010, For want of a nail, For want of a dollar, Obama and Sinclair, Truth about Obama, Obama thugs, Florida district 24 election……



…..March 2010
For want of a messenger.

Whether or not you believe Larry Sinclair’s allegations of a drug and sex encounter with Obama in November 1999 (and how could you possibly not believe it now). Whether or not you like or agree with Larry Sinclair. Larry Sinclair was a huge catalyst for questioning Obama at a time when Obama was getting little scrutiny.
Larry Sinclair is running for Congress, unaffiliated, in Florida District 24. Larry Sinclair has done as much as anyone on this planet to expose the truth about Barack Obama. Sinclair has not backed down from incessant attacks and death threats from the Obama camp. Sinclair has had his Social Security Disability benefits threatened twice and was even arrested on trumped up charges by Joe Biden’s son, Beau. The arrest happened at the conclusion of Larry Sinclair’s press conference at the National Press Club in 2008.

For Want of a Nail
For want of a few dollars.
I spoke to Larry Sinclair last night.
He sent me the following:
“If I pay the $6,960.00 by the deadline I WILL be on the ballot and then our message will be covered. The media is not going to give much coverage to any candidate until the qualifing for the ballot is met.

The two companies that process campaign contributions for us charge 6% from each contribution. I am ready to take on Kosmas and any Republican candidate in this Congressional race, but if we do not get the support we need to meet the requirements to get on the ballot I will not be able to.

People say they are tired of the career politicians. A simple fact of life is the career politicians and political parties have all the money they need to pay fee’s to get their candidates on the ballot.”

2010 Qualifying Dates
Noon, April 26 – Noon, April 30, 2010
*Note: Qualifying papers will be accepted beginning April 12, 2010, pursuant to Section 99.061(8), F.S.
U.S. Senator
Representative in Congress (all districts)
Judicial
State Attorney
Public Defender
The following fee’s are for 2010 candidates.

Office

Partisan                                        No Party Affiliation

U.S. Senator                              $ 10,400                                                         $ 6,960

U.S. Representative



I know that you all are weary of being solicited for money. I understand. That is why this needs to remain a grassroots movement. If 4,000 people only give $ 2.00, the goal will be achieved. I am asking for your time. Help spread the word. Let’s get thousands, if not millions of people involved. Tea party folks, I am asking for your help. Larry Sinclair will continue to help keep Obama accountable. He will also help keep government accountable.
http://larrysinclairforcongress2010.victorydiy.com/

Tags:2010 Election, CitizenWells, Democrats, Florida District 24, Gun Control, HillBuzz, Joe Biden, Kerchner, Larry Sinclair, Les Naiman, Mario Apuzzo, National Press Club, Second Amendment, Tea Party, The BOPAC Report, wgtk 970
Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

Larry Sinclair to Attend Congressional Candidates Meet & Greet – Natural Born Citizen – Dual Citizen Gov. Granholm Thinks She Qualifies – Update on Kerchner v Obama – Navy Seals Prosecution – Glenn Beck Hypocrisy – CitizenWells – The BOPAC Report

February 23, 2010

The BOPAC Report:

Larry Sinclair’s Journey –

Teleprompter holds Whitehouse Protocol Classes. Will Obama bow at Larry Sinclair's meet and greet in Florida?

Larry Sinclair’s Campaign for the 24^th Congressional District seat in Florida is coming right along.

First from CitizenWells:

WDBO, Orlando FL, Candidate: I AM a crook!, Larry Sinclair, District 24, Congressional seat, Suzanne Kosmas, Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine Sex Lies & Murder?

February 22, 2010

WDBO, Orlando FL, Candidate: I AM a crook!

I spoke to Larry Sinclair a few minutes ago, he told me about the following article on the WDBO, Orlando blog.

From WDBO, Hazen’s News Blog, February 22, 2010.

“Candidate: I AM a crook!”

“Republicans have been licking their chops for the past year to find a candidate who can win back the District 24 Congressional seat from Suzanne Kosmas. But they’re also going to have to face off with one “no party affiliation” guy who is laying it all out there.

Allow me to introduce you to Larry Sinclair (that’s him in the picture to the left). He lives in Port Orange, and wants you to know a couple of things.

Per his website:

I have criminal convictions between 1981 thru 1986 for ‘Theft’ based on writing bad checks; ‘Forgery’ for signing former Youth Counselors names to checks, and ‘Unauthorized use of a Financial Transaction Device’ from using a credit card number by phone to pay a hotel stay in 1986.”

“And you have to love his motto.

“I have served my time, now it’s time I serve my Country.””

“The allegations Larry Sinclair makes in this book about our current president should be sending shock-waves through our national media. Consider that on November 6 & 7, 1999 Sinclair claims that he engaged in homosexual acts with then-Illinois Senator Barack Obama, who during these trysts not only procured cocaine for the author, but also smoked crack cocaine while being fellated. Although relatively unknown outside his home state at the time, Obama hit the national stage in 2004 by delivering a keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention. Sinclair realized only then that he’d engaged in sex with an up-and-coming political superstar.”

Read more:

http://wdbo.com/blogs/hazens_news_blog/2010/02/candidate-i-am-a-crook.html

Harry Potter's Mirror of Erised is in Obama Oval Office! Will Obama go to Larry Sinclair's meet and greet in Florida?

Mr. Sinclair is also going to have an opportunity to do a meet and greet in a local restaurant.

Eat dinner – and question congressional candidates for dessert
2010 election, Alan Grayson, Suzanne Kosmas — posted by orlandosentinel on February, 22 2010 12:20 PM

UPDATE: Diana Evans says she’s heard from Sandy Adams, Karen Diebel, Deon Long, Larry Sinclair, Ed Dedelow and Heinie Heintzelman – all Republicans running for the District 24 nomination — have said they’ll be at her next “Eat and Greet.” She said she’s not had an answer yet from GOP candidate Jim Foster or incumbent U.S. Rep. Suzanne Kosmas, D-New Smyrna Beach.

Not long ago, a voter named Diana Evans set up the “Red, White and Blue Team” — herself and four friends — to try to introduce Central Florida voters to the literally dozens of candidates who are running for office in the region. They called their idea “Eat and Greet” — they’d set up at a local restaurant, invite the candidates to make two-minute presentations and then let them circulate to tables for “speed-dating” with constituents…

…It’s this Thursday, Feb. 25th, from 6-8 PM at the Perkins on 11662 University Blvd., near UCF…..Continue Reading

I wish I could be there! Go Larry!!!

Natural Born Citizen Issue-

Obama's New Commander-In-Chief Uniform to Battle Low Morale in Military! Will Obama wear it to Navy Seals Prosecution?

I watched this occur on Fox News Sunday and Chris Wallace’s lack of correction points out that FOX and others are not going to attempt to set the record straight. Being a natural born citizen requires a candidate to be born in the U.S. to parents who were U.S. citizens at the time of his or her birth.

It is very disappointing that it seems the courts are going to allow politicians and the media to effectively amend the Constitution of the United States.

Canadian citizenship hurdle to be U.S. president?

Michigan governor pooh-poohs concern over dual allegiances

Posted: February 22, 2010
11:26 pm Eastern

© 2010 WorldNetDaily

The governor of Michigan has pooh-poohed concern over her allegiance to Canada – she was born there and has dual citizenship in the United States and Canada – and whether that would impact her candidacy if she chose to run for president.

“Come on,” Jennifer Granholm said while being interviewed, along with Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, by Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday.”

The discussion was about what’s going on in Washington and how it impacts states. At the end of the interview, Wallace asked Granholm about her plans.

“Your two terms are up at the end of this year. Do you have any interest in moving here to Washington and working in the administration?” he asked.

“Are you offering me a job? No, I …” she said.

“Yes, because I’m a conduit for the Obama White House. Exactly,” Wallace joked.

“No, I’m totally focused this year on creating every single job I can until the last moment,” Granholm said. “December 31st at midnight is when I’ll stop. So I have no idea what I’m going to do next, but I’m not going to run for president. I can tell you that.”

Wallace then pointed out that she would be unqualified to run, anyway.

“We should point out Gov. Granholm is a Canadian and cannot run for president,” he said.

“I’m American. I’ve got dual citizenship,” Granholm corrected him….Continue Reading

Dalai Lama has advice for Obama! America Must Demand Proof or Face the Consequences!

From Mario Apuzzo comes news regarding Kerchner v Obama.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Court Grants Motion for Leave to File Overlength Brief in Kerchner Appeal

On January 19, 2010, I filed the Appellants’ Opening Brief in the appeal of Kerchner et al. v. Obama et al. which is currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. In that appeal, we maintain that the New Jersey Federal District Court erred in dismissing our case by ruling that plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge Obama’s alleged eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military and that our case presents a non-justiciable political question. In our case, we have provided the Founder’s and Framers’ definition of an Article II “natural born Citizen” which is a child born in the country to citizen parents. We maintain that Obama is not an Article II “natural born Citizen” because he lacks unity of citizenship and allegiance from birth which is obtained when a child is born in the United States to a mother and father who are both United States citizens at the time of birth. Obama’s father was only a temporary visitor to the United States when Obama was born and never even became a resident let alone a citizen. Not being an Article II “natural born Citizen,” Obama is not eligible to be President and Commander in Chief.…Continue Reading

Ji’Obama’had –

Tomb of Unknow Soldiers! WTF is the Obama Administration Doing Prosecuting Our Navy Seals? It's all part of Obama's script in the tiresome and dangerous play - “How can I F%@K the military again today?”

Update on Obama’s prosecution of three Navy Seals. Maybe the Navy Seals should state in open court that if any violation of the UCMJ occurred, it would have been the result of unlawful orders issued by the Usurper-In-Chief.

5 potential witnesses could support SEALs accused of abuse

By Kate Wiltrout
The Virginian-Pilot
© February 20, 2010

NORFOLK

Five sailors could offer testimony contradicting the government’s main witness in the controversial prosecution of three Navy SEALs accused of mistreating a suspected Iraqi terrorist.

But whether they’ll take the stand is in question after the government denied their requests for immunity on Friday.

Attorney Charles Gittins represents the five potential witnesses, including two officers who led the SEAL detachment that captured Ahmed Hashim Abed in Fallujah in September. Abed is the alleged mastermind of the murders of four Blackwater contractors in Fallujah in 2004.

Gittins said his clients’ testimony would be inconsistent with some or all of the statements made by Petty Officer 3rd Class Kevin Demartino, the Navy master-at-arms who claimed to have seen a SEAL hit Abed while he was being held in a U.S. detainee facility after his capture….Continue Reading

Glenn Beck Hypocrisy –

Like you Glenn but instead of ridiculing those questioning Obama's eligibility - question Jindal's eligibility. Take an enema and come back to the light!

I do like Glenn Beck but he is half full of poop when it comes to the ‘natural born citizen’ issue. I’ve stopped watching Glenn because he even though he says it’s the Constitution that’s the blueprint to follow, he can’t seem to bring himself to utter the words ‘natural born citizen’ – much less explain it. I wish Mr. Beck would call CitizenWells for his scolding. Maybe we should go to Washington in August to Glenn’s ‘Restore America’ rally and see if we can have a minute.

Glenn Beck CPAC speech, Glenn Beck hypocrisy, Citizen Wells waiting on call, Beck insults Americans, You can disagree with me, Glenn Beck quotes Constitution attacks concerned Americans, Beck fair?

February 22, 2010

Glenn Beck CPAC speech, Glenn Beck hypocrisy

“There is an epidemic of shooting messengers in this country.”…Citizen Wells

Glen Beck spoke to the CPAC gathering on Saturday, February 20, 2010.
I was moved by the speech.
I do not dislike Glenn Beck. I despise his hypocrisy.

The words that Glenn Beck spoke were great. What prevents those words from going down in history as a great speech is that Glenn Beck spoke those words as platitudes and not his creed.

Glenn Beck, many months ago, I told those around me that I would love to meet you. Not because I am star struck, I most assuredly am not. But because I respected what you were saying and accomplishing. Now I still want to meet you, but for a different reason. To give you a scolding, to grab you by the collar, shake some sense into you and to tell you to shut up and listen….Continue Reading

Tags:Chris Wallace, CitizenWells, Fox News Sunday, Glenn Beck, Kerchner, Larry Sinclair, Mario Apuzzo, Navy Seals Prosecution, UCMJ
Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

Afghanistan – “Unlawful Orders” – “Natural Born Citizen” – Kerchner – Mario Apuzzo – CitizenWells – The BOPAC Report

December 1, 2009

The BOPAC Report:

“Natural Born Citizen”≠ “Citizen” –

It seems that some in the public have fallen prey to the media’s assertion/implication that if Obama was born in Hawaii then of course he is a “natural born citizen”. No so.

Mario Apuzzo gives a complete analysis of the misconceptions.

Monday, November 30, 2009

United States v. Low Hong, 261 F.73 (5th Cir. 1919) Is No Precedent on the Question of What is an Article II “Natural Born Citizen”

There are some blogs that are citing the case of United States v. Low Hong, 261 F.73 (5th Cir. 1919), http://books.google.com/books?id=lnU4AAAAIAAJ&dq=%22Low%20Hong&as_brr=1&client=firefox-a&pg=PA73#v=onepage&q=&f=false, as the latest word on what a “natural born Citizen” is. Their position is that this case proves that a child born in the United States even to alien parents is a “natural born Citizen.” The issue that was before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals was whether a petitioner was entitled to be discharged from immigration custody on his habeas corpus petition when he showed that the government was holding him in custody pending a deportation hearing before the Secretary of Labor (who handled immigration matters then) under the Immigration Act, § 17 (Comp. St. 1918, § 4289 1/4ii), and other sections relating to excluding and deporting persons from the country, which is expressly applicable only to aliens. Affirming the judgment of the district court which granted the petition and his release, the Court held that since the government had admitted that the petitioner was a citizen (which the government did not), it could not hold him in immigration custody and had to release him.

Low Hong alleged in his amended habeas petition that he was born in the United States and that he was a citizen thereof. The government did not deny his allegation that he was born in the United States. But it also did not admit that he was a citizen. The government’s position was that there was no factual dispute and that the case dealt with only a legal question as to petitioner’s citizenship which was not properly before the Court on a habeas corpus petition which it said petitioner filed prematurely. The Court ruled that the government did not dispute that petitioner was born in the United States. It therefore also ruled that the government admitted petitioner was a citizen. The Court also ruled that the statute allowing excluding and deporting aliens applied only to aliens. The Court found that the government’s admission that Low Hong was a citizen was also an admission by the government that he could not be held in immigration custody pending a deportation hearing before the Secretary of Labor. The Court said that since the government admitted Low Hong was a citizen, the Secretary of Labor had no jurisdiction or authority to detain him in immigration custody pending his deportation hearing. Low Hong therefore had to be released.

There are two errors with the Low Hong decision. First, the government never admitted that petitioner was a citizen. Rather, it only admitted that he was born in the United States and took the position that the status of his citizenship was “nothing but a question of law” yet to be decided. While the decision does not make any mention of petitioner’s parents, they were probably Chinese aliens who could not naturalize in the United States because of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 (among other things, made Chinese immigrants who were in the United States permanent aliens by prohibiting them from becoming citizens through naturalization) which were not repealed until the 1943 Magnuson Act which permitted Chinese who were already in the United States to naturalize and thereby become United States citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment. We also do not know if petitioner’s parents met the same factual scenario as did the parents of Wong Kim Ark in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) (the Court decided the case based only “upon the facts agreed by the parties” and that the “necessary effect” of its decision was to declare “a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States”). Id. 169 U.S. at 705. Hence, the Court on its own took the conceded fact that the petitioner was born in the United States and added that the government also conceded that he was a citizen.

The second error that the Court made is in declaring the petitioner a “natural-born citizen” on the record that it had before it. In Low Hong, the issue was not whether the petitioner was an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Rather, the issue was whether he could be held in immigration detention pending deportation if he was an admitted citizen as the Court perceived the government to have conceded. The Court in dicta then said that “[t]he averments of the amended petition show that the appellee is a natural-born citizen of the United States,” citing United States v. Wong Kim, 169 U.S. 649 (1898). The reference to “natural-born citizen” was dicta because the question of whether Low Hong was a “natural born Citizen” was not before the Court. Without any opportunity for the government to even address the issue, the Court concluded that Low Hong was a citizen because the government did not contest the petitioner’s allegation that he was born in the United States. Low Hong only needed to be a born United States citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment or some Congressional Act to avoid detention and deportation. There was no need for Low Hong to also be declared an Article II “natural born Citizen.”

The Low Hong Court’s citing Wong Kim Ark also does not make the decision a precedent for the meaning of Article II “natural born Citizen.” Wong Kim Ark, also presented with a person born in the United States to alien Chinese parents, did not declare Wong a “natural born citizen” but rather only a “citizen” of the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Wong Kim Ark Court never connected Wong’s citizen status to an Article II “natural born Citizen.” The Court also did not say that there was no difference between a Fourteenth Amendment born citizen and an Article II “natural born Citizen.”

The Low Hong Court did not explain what made Low Hong a “natural born citizen” as opposed to just a plain “citizen” which is what he alleged in his amended habeas petition. Hence, the Court’s gratuitous statement that Low Hong was a “natural-born citizen” was not only not addressed by the parties or analyzed in any way by the Court but also has no basis in law or fact. In Low Hong, the Court did not even perceive citizenship to be in issue. We surely cannot use the decision for any precedent on the meaning of an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Its conclusory statement regarding Low Hong being a “natural- born citizen” is therefore not binding on any court.

The Constitution, Congressional Acts, United States Supreme Court decisions, and the Fourteenth Amendment itself also show that the Low Hong court was wrong in declaring the petitioner a “natural born Citizen.” We cannot reasonably deny that the Constitution makes a distinction between a “citizen” and a “natural born Citizen.” Article II itself, in specifying the eligibility requirements, clearly spells out that there is a difference between a “citizen” and a “natural born Citizen,” for the former was grandfathered eligible to be President up to the time of the adoption of the Constitution and the latter represented the new standard for Presidential eligibility for births after the adoption of the Constitution. The “Citizen” grandfather clause is now obsolete. The Constitution at Article I, III, IV and at Amendment XI, XIV, XV, XIX, XXIV, and XXVI also mentions “Citizen” and not “natural born Citizen.” Hence, the only place that the Constitution refers to a “natural born Citizen” is in Article II, Section 1, clause 5.

Even Congress, throughout our history has distinguished between a “Citizen” and a “natural born Citizen.” ….Continue Reading

I urge everyone to read Mario Apuzzo’s explanation in its entirety.

CitizenWells gives a concise summary of the issues that need be addressed by America’s Court system if Americans can continue to have faith that no one is above the law and Constitution.

INTERNET BILLBOARD

Article II, Sec. 1, cl. 5 of the US Constitution

“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President. . .”

From the 20th Amendment to the US Constitution.

“or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until
a President shall have qualified;”

December 1, 2009

Attention: Congress, Courts, Media

It is not a conspiracy theory. Using the term “birther” in a condescending, Orwellian manner to discredit decent, hard working Americans who believe that the US Constitution is the law of the land, will not be tolerated.

1. Barack Obama has employed a legion of private and government attorneys to prevent revealing his country of birth. Innocent and eligible persons seeking the office of president do not do that.

2. Barack Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya and a British citizen. “natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution” was explicitly written to deal with the issue of foreign allegiances at the time of the writing of the US Constitution.

3. Barack Obama’s citizenship and allegiance was further tainted when he was adopted by his stepfather Lolo Soetoro and Obama became an Indonesian citizen.

4. Some combination of the above allowed Obama to travel to Pakistan in 1981 when travel there was restricted to US citizens.

5. The only document presented by the Obama camp is a Hawaii COLB. There has been no substantiation that it is authentic and it does not establish country of birth. As Lou Dobbs stated, “It is a piece of paper that refers to another piece of paper.”

6. All other documentation, all school records, that would establish country of birth have been kept hidden and restricted.

7. No authentic documentation has been presented to establish that Barack Obama was born in the US.

8. The records of all hospitals in Hawaii have been searched. There is no record of Stanley Ann Obama ever having given birth to a child.

9. Barack Obama’s paternal grandmother in Kenya has stated on multiple occasions that she was present at Obama’s birth in Mombasa.

10. Others have stated, including multiple family members, officials and press, that Obama was born in Kenya.

This has been presented in a manner that a fifth grader can understand. However, if you have any questions, please contact me on this blog.

Failure to learn more about and understand this critical issue and take appropriate measures can only be construed as apathy, ignorance or having an un American agenda. This includes the Mainstream Media and the Fox network.

This is not a fringe movement. It’s the Constitution, stupid.

Many of those alarmed by the constitutional crisis created by Barack Obama’s avoidance of proof of eligibilty are in the US Military….

It is this last sentence should cause any judge worth his/her salt to step up to the political heat and allow the facts to be established in an open court. Our military is fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan while Obama has spent the last several months dithering. What kind of Judge could allow reasonable doubts to remain in the minds of our soldiers concerning the possibility of following “unlawful orders”?

The entire Obama Administration is proving on a daily basis that it is full of poop to its core.

Tags:Afghanistan, CitizenWells, Crap, Defeat in Afghanistan, Full of Poop, Iraq, Kerchner, Mario Apuzzo, Media bias, Natural Born Citizen, Navy Seals, Obama, Rush Limbaugh, Surge, The BOPAC Report, Truth
Posted in 1 | Leave a Comment »

Posts Tagged ‘Kerchner’

Natural Born Citizen -

Journolist Truth Assassins –

Commentary -

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters. Albert Einstein

Other News:

Obama’s Health Care Deform –

Natural Born Citizen Issue –

Ji’Obama’had –

2010 Year of the Turdnado –

Ji’Obama’had –

ObamaCare(Mess) –

Natural Born Citizen Issue –

Good Luck Commander!

Navy Seals Prosecution –

ObamaNomics &

States Stimulus Crutch –

Tea Party Health Care Takeover Protests –

Natural Born Citizen –

ObamaCare –

ChiBama Politics –

March 18, 2010 ·

Second Amendment –

Natural Born Citizen –

Awakenings –

Larry Sinclair’s Journey –

Larry Sinclair’s Journey –

February 22, 2010

Natural Born Citizen Issue-

Ji’Obama’had –

Glenn Beck Hypocrisy –

“Natural Born Citizen”≠ “Citizen” –

The entire Obama Administration is proving on a daily basis that it is full of poop to its core.

Blogroll

Obama Lawsuits

Organized Resistance

Sites Documenting

Source of Allegations

Pages

Follow “The BOPAC Report & Larry Sinclair's Allegations”

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Albert Einstein