Larry Sinclair May Benefit by Newfound ‘Media’ Interest in Scandals – RNC Strip Club Spree May Help – What About Obama’s Drug & Sex Spree With Mr. Sinclair? – Ambassador Alan Keyes – Natural Born Citizen Litigation – Code Pink, Now That’s a Violent Mob – The BOPAC Report

The BOPAC Report

Larry Sinclair’s Journey –

 

Will Larry Sinclair have a Quo Warranto action against Obama?

Well, well, it seems the media is looking under every rock, in every strip club for the possibly of a scandal that will tarnish the image of those who oppose Obama’s policies.   They are looking in the wrong places for a scandal of epic proportions.  Those can only be found in the back of White Limos!

Maybe all this newfound curiosity on the part of the ‘media’ will bring them back to visit the accusations of Larry Sinclair.  If they would actually investigate Larry Sinclair’s claims, they would likely find that his accusations hold water.

I’m not going to hold my breath because everyone knows that the only water the ‘media’ holds is Obama’s. 

Larry Sinclair is still around, his story is still plausible, his statements are still consistent, nothing in the time-line has been refuted, and he’s running for Congress in Florida.  Now that’s a story!

From Right Pundits:

RNC Strip Club Spree Raises Eyebrows, Yawns

By MCCAIN

The cable channel airwaves are awash with news of an RNC strip club spending scandal which was disclosed in the Republican National Committee’s financial report. Must be a slow news day but we will cover this lustful story like a wet blanket because inquiring minds want to know who was there and what exactly happened.

The latest RNC public disclosures indicate that fully $2,000 was spent at an upscale LA strip club in California. As a reporter who worked undercover for years in this field, I can report that two thousand dollars would cover an entry fee for 8 people, 1 drink each, and 1 tip each. Men behaving like men? Stop the presses!

Unenlightened media personalities are taking to calling this not only a strip club, but a “bondage” strip club because a couple of the dancers used leather and whips when dancing the poll. These tea totaling liberals have ne’er witnessed such behavior in their college coffee shops, so what they do not yet know is that all strip clubs in the world are so inclined to entertain their guests with such toys.

Nevertheless the RNC says that it is investigating the expenditure presumably because of the bad publicity this story will generate among their many gay and lesbian supporters. Heh.

The $2,000 was invested at the Voyeur West Hollywood in Los Angeles, which is an expensive nightclub that caters to the rich and famous in Hollywood. Most importantly RNC chairman Michael Steele is reportedly outraged, and says that no, he was not present, no way, Jose for the good times.

An interest in strip clubs is one topic which clearly delineates the average GOP strip club man from Barack Obama himself so we do not believe that the president attended this RNC event. After all Obama did famously find himself in a strip club before his U.S. Senate run apparently just once. Reports are that he quickly headed to the door. Whether our president is disinterested in affairs of the flesh or worried about bad publicity remains a mystery.

Among other rumors drifting about before the presidential election, some of the most fantastic and unbelievable are those made by Larry Sinclair (video below). He is the man who claimed to have had gay sex with Obama when the president was in his formative years as a young man in the late 1990s…Continue Reading

 

Natural Born Citizen Issue –

 

Just like Obama is not Malcolm X - Obama is not a "Natural Born Citizen"! Obama may look like Malcolm X and Obama may be a "Citizen"; but being a "Citizen" does not necessarily mean that Obama is a "Natural Born Citizen"! Joint Chiefs of Staff’s new mottos: Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil & Don’t rock the boat!

There’s still time for the Supreme Court perform their duty to the Constitution.

From World Net Daily:

California ‘had duty’ to examine Obama eligibility

Keyes’ brief cites Supreme Court determination candidates can be removed from ballot

Posted: March 29, 2010
9:58 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

A brief submitted to an appeals court in California explains that elections officials in California had a duty to examine Barack Obama’s eligibility to the office of president during the 2008 election.

WND previously has reported on the case brought by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes and others.

He has argued that a judge’s earlier dismissal of the case ignored significant precedents, that state officials previously removed from the ballot a nominee for president simply because he did not meet constitutional eligibility requirements and in another situation, a court actually removed a government’s chief elected executive from office for not being eligible.

A multitude of cases have been brought over the issue of Obama’s eligibility. Some are by critics who have doubts about whether he was born in Hawaii in 1961 as he has written, and others are from those who question whether the framers of the Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens – Obama’s father was a subject of the British crown at Obama’s birth – from being eligible for the presidency.

The disputes revolve around the Constitution’s demand that the president be a “natural born citizen.” …Continue Reading

ChiBama Politics –

 

Loyalty is Required in the Obama Cult!

Where’s the Media coverage of Code Pink’s violent escapades? 

Code Pink mob shuts down Rove book event

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 30, 2010 02:31 AM

They’re baaaaaack in full force. The speech-stifling, original angry mob of Code Pinkos shouted down Karl Rove during a book tour event in Beverly Hills tonight — forcing him to cut his remarks short and leave before attendees could get their books signed. Code Pink co-founder/terror-coddler/Obama funder Jodie Evans pulled her old “citizens’ arrest” prank and stormed right up to Rove with handcuffs. She and other members tried to incite the crowd with shouts of “war criminal.”

….Continue Reading

Other Team FOCOA News –

(Full of Crap Obama Administration)

The Permanant Handout Herd is Leading America to Slaughter! Everyone Needs a Hand Up from Time to Time, but Expecting it to be a Permanent Fixture is Distructive to America!

 

Here’s a must see post!

March 29th, 2010 12:27 pm

Searchlight vs. L.A.: Rival Rallies Reveal Stark Right/Left Divide

On March 27, 2010, thousands of people gathered in the small town of Searchlight, Nevada, for a political rally.

Just 250 miles away and seven days earlier, there was another political rally of similar size in Los Angeles on March 20, 2010.

The Searchlight rally was generally oriented toward the political “right.”

Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Albert Einstein

 

The Los Angeles rally was generally oriented toward the political “left.”……

Obama, Money Laundering, Acorn, FEC, Article at NOQUARTER

This important article is from NOQUARTER:

______________________________________________________________

Note. This article makes serious assertions. Therefore each statement of fact is supported by external sources or references, listed at the end of the article.
______________________________________________________________

Is This a Money Laundering Scandal?

Is the Obama Campaign falsifying its FEC disclosure reports by using a front company to disguise its relationship with ACORN, a controversial group?

By Eastan McNeal on August 20, 2008

Less than one month after admitting that it had received over $30,000 in illegal contributions from Gaza it seems the Obama for America campaign is facing yet another damaging issue related to campaign finance. This time the infraction emerges from potentially shady expenditures or expenditure reporting. It is, however, highly unlikely that the campaign can write this disclosure pattern off as a “technical glitch” or a “clerical error” as the firms involved are much more than just casually linked, and the misrepresentations occur on eleven separate documents.

Why is Barack Obama spending nearly $1,000,000 on a business housed here?According to Federal Election Commission (FEC) financial disclosure reports filed by the campaign earlier this year, between February 25th and May 17th Obama paid $832,598 to Citizens Services, Inc. (CSI), one of the nearly seventy Not-for-Profit companies registered at the ACORN New Orleans headquarters on 1024 Elysian Fields Avenue [SEE IMAGE OF THE NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS of CSI as well as 20 other businesses.]. CSI now also shares an office with ACORN in Chicago at 209 W. Jackson St., home of the SEIU (Service Employees International Union).

On the surface, the 11 separate payments to CSI appear to be for services typically useful to a campaign. However, as confirmed by one of its directors, CSI does not offer the services listed on the Obama campaign expense reports. According to the director, and as found in various disclosure reports from other candidates, CSI specializes in field operations, specifically grass roots organizing for get out the vote efforts. The Obama expense reports list the following payments to CSI: $564,342 for Stage, Sound, Lighting, $138,000 for Advance Work, $18,417 for Polling and $98,451 for Travel/Lodging. There is no “get out the vote” expenditure to CSI in the reports.

After retrieving a copy of CSI’s business registration form from the Louisiana Secretary of State’s office, on July 24th one of our researchers contacted Sunday Alabi, the first Director listed on the corporate filing. Our caller asked Mr. Alabi if CSI could provide Stage, Sound and Lighting for a campaign. Mr. Alabi’s response was that those services are not the nature of CSI’s business and that our caller would need to contact ACORN. The same response was given when questioned about polling and campaign advance work. But those are the services listed by Obama on the FEC reports. Services supposedly performed by CSI.

CSI is supposedly totally independent of ACORN. However, Jeff Robinson, who reportedly heads the company, is listed in his LinkedIn public profile as the National Deputy Political Director-Campaigns and Elections at ACORN and the Political Director at Communities Voting Together which, by the way, contributed $60,000 to CSI. In May of this year he publicly endorsed the Bob Blumenfield campaign by way of his position as a Director of ACORN. Furthermore, all of CSI’s directors are in ACORN leadership. One should ask why there appears to be so much deception and misdirection surrounding a tiny storefront not-for-profit organization from New Orleans.

Do you pay a fast food restaurant to set a broken bone? That is, incredibly, how absurd these election reports are. A brief conversation with an enforcement officer at the FEC, using hypothetical names, yielded the following response.

According to the FEC, in a situation where a campaign committee reports that they paid a company for services that the company says they do not provide, there is reason to be suspicious. It was irregular. And, it was inappropriate. To wit in 1997 Congresswoman Mary Rose Oakar (OH) was prosecuted by the U.S. Justice Department for conspiracy to deceive the FEC as to the true nature of the campaign contributions and expenditures that she was required to report. Falsifying federal disclosure reports is a serious matter and it is a crime. If the FEC chooses to exercise equal enforcement then Senator Obama could very well be subject to prosecution….Read the rest of this article at NOQUARTER

Larry Sinclair, Obama, More Inappropriate Usage of Presidential Seal

This is from CitizenWells:

Larry Sinclair in Chicago, Obama doll, Presidential Seal, Obama home for sale, Indictment, Prison, Larry Sinclair article, Did I miss the Presidential Election

August 12, 2008 · No Comments

Larry Sinclair made a stop in Chicago. He noticed two things. An Obama doll with the presidential seal and Obama’s home for sale. Is Obama expecting an indictment? Is Obama expecting expulsion from the Senate? Does Obama have a new home in prison? Here is the article from Larry Sinclair:

“Did I miss the Presidential Election
While in Chicago this evening I came across an interesting item being sold in Obamaland.  According to the packaging of this Obama doll “HE IS ALREADY PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES” I find it unacceptable that Barack Obama is using “The Seal of The President of The United States” to sell dolls of his big ears and his forked tongue.  This is an outright illegal and unauthorized use of the Presidential Seal.  I also found something else interesting while in Chicago.  Barack and Michelle Obama seem to have put their Chicago area home up for sale.  I will be posting a new blog article later on Tuesday when I have returned to Duluth on this and what I plan to do to demand Obama admit his acts of crack smoking, cheating on Michelle (who by the way is featured on the cover of Ebony Magazine in an airbrushed photo) and his involvement with Donald Young.”

Read more from Larry Sinclair here:

http://larrysinclair0926.com

Make sure you visit the Petition to Impeach Senator Obama site:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Obama, Media, Jounalists Trampling on the Sacrifice of Our Fathers, Mothers, Sisters, Brothers

American Journalists are Trampling the Sacrifice of Our Fathers, Mothers, Sisters and Brothers

(Unfortunately, the Journalists taking part in this travesty far outnumber the headstones at Normandy)

Whether it is because the Journalist cherishes the idea of breaking a barrier such as electing a person of color (possibly their own), or the Journalist simply wants to be a part of facilitating such a history making event, or the Journalist is desperate for a change of party (possibly to their own), or the Journalist is just taking sides, or the Journalist fears criticizing the candidate out of fear of being labeled racist, or the Journalist fears repercussions from their bosses, or the Journalist fears repercussions from their community, or the Journalists fears hurting their 12 year olds feelings if they criticize the 12 year old’s candidate – if a Journalist could lay claim to all of these reasons, they would still fall incredibly short of justifying the decision to not fully undertake their professional responsibilities owed to general public during the election process for President of The United States of America.

During election years, the duty or trust owed to the public is at its highest and should be undertaken vigilantly by the Journalist. It is the duty to truthfully and comprehensively inform. So when the voter goes into the voting booth, he or she can feel confident that they have as much accurate information about the candidates as one could reasonably expect. It is a high standard that the Journalist must meet. If a Journalist is doing their job, it sometimes will hurt when information is discovered that lessens their own candidate’s chances. However, the good Journalist would disclose it as fairly and accurately as they could even though it hurt.

Why does the Journalist need to disclose damaging information about a candidate? To put it simply, it is the job of the Journalist and it sometimes requires courage. The more meaningful reason is that since the birth of this Nation, we have faced peril at home and aboard. Our Freedoms exist today because American’s of all ages, genders, colors, and ethnicities have answered when called and stood tall to defend these Freedoms. No matter what political party, or what ethnicity, or color, or gender a Journalist fits into, every Journalist stands in liberty upon the shoulders of those who have answered the call. The soldiers, the diplomats, the cooks, the farmers, the mechanics, the riveters, the men, the women, families, and yes, the Journalists – all have made extraordinary sacrifices when our Freedoms have been threatened in the past.

We would not have free and fair elections if it were not for those courageous individuals who have come before. Free & Fair are the operative words that underpin the process, it is what turns a process into one of our Freedoms. Therefore, as a Freedom, our election process surely must be protected. As we all have experienced or read in history books, the process has needed protection in years past and it will need protecting in the years to come. Fair and committed Journalists are on the front line in protecting this vital Freedom, our elections.

I realize that when I about freedoms, liberties, and other ideals that come to mind when talking about America, it can sound a bit preachy. I am not a preacher. (Depending on the issue is being discussed; I may come down right, left, center or some combination of the three.) I am however a Veteran and I have also served in other positions with government. So when I talk about service to country – it is a broad inclusive concept. For this topic though, shame is probably the only thing that has even a remote possibility of reaching our Journalists today; and even that won’t work for the one with the leg tingling issue. Regrettably, it also seems that attempting to shame someone can sound preachy. However, since this is a critically important election, so I’ll continue.

In this election, it is almost impossible to argue with a straight face, that Senators Obama and McCain are receiving the same attention, scrutiny, and criticism by the media. Senator McCain has been vetted for 20 plus years by Journalists. Senator Obama is the man of the moment who is filling a pair of shoes poised to cross into the history books. To many in the media, it doesn’t appear to matter what the Senator is actually saying. (Many fairly bizarre statements come out when he doesn’t have a script.) Journalists are not seeing, listening, or most importantly, they are not investigating. They only seem to care that this particular pair of shoes cross the line with someone in them.

When good Journalist’s do their jobs correctly, they keep their senses keen in order to discover relevant information, facts, and their implications. They investigate, probe, question, analyze, and compile findings. Finally, they report the findings fairly and accurately about the candidates. It should not matter what party a candidate is from to a good Journalist. At press conferences, they ask fair, but hard questions of the candidates regarding their findings. They don’t fall in love with either the politician or the idea of a historic event. Attraction does not matter in regards to a Journalist’s responsibility to the voters.

If rumors, facts, or allegations point to something important that voters need to know, the good Journalist must investigate and ask the questions as long as questions remain. It is not the answer so much as the asking, investigation, and verification that are critical to maintain free and fair elections.

In Senator Obama’s case, a great many substantial questions remain either unanswered, inadequately answered, or have never been properly investigated. Some of the questions that beg for a good Journalist’s skills regard: The Senator’s experience; his voting record in Illinois concerning major issues; the development and influences affecting his ideology (Marxist/Socialist?); his past associations (Wright, Farrakhan, Ayers and company, Rezko and company, etc.) and their impact on him; all possible financial arrangements, obligations, fund transfers or favors regarding Rezko and company; the allegations of Larry Sinclair involving gay sex and drug use with the Senator in 1999; the allegations of improper loans, grants or transfers of monies from any organization for which the Senator served on the board ( Woods Fund); the issues that could be reveled, clarified or resolved relating to the Senator’s failure to release his birth certificate, Illinois Bar application, medical records; etc. etc. etc.

During Presidential elections, when people who hold themselves out as professional journalists fail to do their jobs, we are all cheated and our democracy is weakened. I really don’t understand how such people, who owe both their Freedoms and professions to the courageous upon whose shoulders they stand, can look in the mirror each day.

When I think about my father’s service as an Infantryman in Patton’s 3^rd Army fighting in the Battle of the Bulge, and latter as a guard at the Nuremberg War Trials of some of the Germans responsible for the Holocaust, and the effects his service had on him; I appreciate him even more. Partly because of his service, I try never to take for granted all the blessings we have just by virtue of being lucky enough to have been born in this country. There are millions of people like my father who have sacrificed for all of us. I thank them.

Then when I watch today’s Journalists swoon over, protect, fail to report damaging information, toss softball questions, and/or fail to investigate legitimate issues regarding a candidate for the Presidency; I worry that many Journalists and Americans don’t really care if our democracy continues.

And that my friend makes me sad.

Okay now I will be preachy. Remember Billy Graham events. At the end, when the guy with the nice deep voice would sing, and Rev. Graham would fold his hands and pray. Okay. That’s the scene. One difference, the audience is made up only of the Journalist’s I’ve been talking about. Rev. Graham speaks: You who are seated and feel the pull of your responsibility. You know who you are. I want you to get up right now and COME. Don’t worry about the people around you. They’ll wait. COME. I want you to come right now – down front because you can’t accept your responsibility in the dark. You must accept it in public. The Voters have been waiting on you to accept your responsibility for months now. Now is the time. Answer the call, COME. Down front you will find some Voters who you can share your information with and your commitment to do the best you can from this moment. COME. You folks seeing this on your computer screen. You need to encourage the Journalists you see making their way down the isles. Reward them with your attention. Amen

Donald Young murder, Jeremiah Wright, Larry Sinclair new post, OBAMA PASTOR JEREMIAH WRIGHT ANNOUNCES YOUNG DEATH BEFORE YOUNG IS PRONOUNCED DEAD!

This is from CitizenWells Site:

July 19, 2008 · No Comments

Larry Sinclair has a new post up. Sinclair has compared information on the death certificate of Donald Young to the announcement of Young’s death by Jeremiah Wright. Sinclair also provides information on the death of Nate Spencer and Larry Bland.

“OBAMA PASTOR JEREMIAH WRIGHT ANNOUNCES YOUNG DEATH BEFORE YOUNG IS PRONOUNCED DEAD!

Posted by Larry Sinclair on July 18th, 2008

Certified Copies of Death Certificates Raise even More Questions

Below is the Chicago Television News report on the murder of Trinity United Christian Church Choir Director and openly gay lover of presumptive Democratic Presidential Nominee Barack Obama.

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=5854125

Now I have the following questions to ask based on fact, not fiction as has been claimed by the Obama internet warrior.

1.   Jeremiah Wright announced Donald Young’s death at either the 7:30 AM or 11:00 AM Service. Based on the Certified copy of Chicago Death Certificate on Donald Young, Young was “found shot at 7:30 am,” but was not pronounced dead in his apartment from multiple gunshot wounds by Medical Examiner until 12:10 PM, Sunday December 23, 2007.

How did Jeremiah Wright already know Donald Young was dead?  Who told him?

The following information is also provided to demonstrate that which I have always stated was my knowledge, instead of the pro Obama factions making claims I have accused Obama of being involved in multiple murders.

I have always stated that while Larry Bland was indeed the victim of murder (Bland was pronounced dead by Medical Examiner of Multiple gun shot wounds November 17, 2007 at 8:40 AM) I have always stated it was my belief Young’s murder was intentionally made to appear to have been committed by the same killer of Bland.

Nate Spencer was not murdered, and in fact the information that I posted and informed people was my understanding is in fact verified based on the certified copy of the Death Certificate of Nate Spencer.  Nate Spencer pronounced dead of natural causes, “septicemia, pneumonia, HIV December 26, 2007 at 6:31 AM”

I repeat my above question:  How did Jeremiah Wright already know Donald Young was dead?  Who told Wright that Young was dead well before Donald Young was pronounced dead?”

Read more about this story here:

http://larrysinclair0926.com/