Larry Sinclair continues to ask a most basic question regarding the murder of Donald Young (former Obama lover?) and continues to get no answer.
Written By: Larry – Jan• 18•11
“Has there been an arrest made in the Donald Young murder?”
Seems like that would be a very straightforward question that Chicago Police could easily answer with a simple yes or no. But that is not the case here. In fact today Chicago Police Area 2 Detective Buis or Bois (? spelling) decided to show the professionalism Chicago is known for and hang up the phone rather than answer the simple question.
I submitted a FOIA request to the Chicago Police Department which was logged into their FOIA log on January 7, 2011. Today I received the reply from the Chicago Police Departments Public Information Officer. I have linked my original FOIA request here, and the Chicago Police Departments FOIA response. The redacted report the Chicago Police Departments Public Information officer released can be seen here… Continue Reading
Lt. Col. Lakin’s Journey –
An interesting development in a NY case concerning the eligibility of Obama to sit in the Oval Office occurred in the case of Strunk v Paterson on January 11th at a motion for leave to file an amended complaint hearing. This case appears to focus completely on Obama’s dual citizenship as a bar to his obtaining the status of a Natural Born Citizen under the Constitution. Plaintiffs even go so far as to accept (for now) the controversial ‘fact-checked’ document Obama relies on as prima facie proof of a birth in Hawaii. (The document could be challenged later as to what exactly it might prove if authenticated.) I like that approach. Keep the argument targeted! The case is one about defendants’ breach of a fiduciary duty for equal treatment regarding ballot access.
Lt. Col. Lakin remains a political prisoner of the BOPAC Administration while evidence continues to mount that Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen, eligible to hold the position of Commander in Chief of America’s Armed Forces.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Via Chris Strunk; The first time anywhere in the USA since 1824, that any Judge has opined on what Natural Born citizen is and concluding that BHO Jr. is not NBC….
….5. The Court asked if Plaintiff is seeking to obtain a copy of Barack Hussein Obama Jr.’s (BHO Jr.) Certified Birth record herein; to wit Plaintiff responded “NO”. Plaintiff seeks a decision by the Court as to whether or not the Candidate(s) are eligible for Office of President of the United States (POTUS) as required with the United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 as required as a regulation by the New York State Board of Elections including inter alias based upon the Certificate of Live Birth published August 21, 2008 by Annenberg Political Fact Check at FactCheck.org http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (see Exhibit A); and that as a prima facie matter Plaintiff seeks a Court decision herein as to whether or not Obama in fact has Dual Allegiance, is not a Natural Born Citizen per se but merely a Native-Born citizen if that; because BHO Jr.’s father, BHO Sr., is a British subject with a student visa at that time, and is shown to be the purported father of BHO Jr. by both the newspaper announcement and the COLB shown by Fact Check.org; and therefore, at best BHO Jr. is only a “Native” born citizen, if that, with only one U.S. Citizen parent mother as a minor at his birth, and that without two U.S. Citizen parents – BHO Jr. is NOT a “Natural” born citizen at best is “Native” born.
6. The Court asked to know Plaintiff’s understanding of the difference between “Native” and “Natural” born citizen, to wit Plaintiff explained on a blood and soil basis as of the Law of Nations as related to the 1961, 1963 and 1969 Vienna Convention Treaty matters as to citizenship status as with the children of diplomats and tourists who were not certified admitted by the U.S. Customs Service; and
7. Plaintiff provided the Court with a copy of the SCOTUS decision in McCreery’s Lessee v Somerville 22 US 354 (1824) (see Exhibit B), and
8. That the Court responded favorably to Plaintiff’s argument and contention expressing familiarity with the difference between the Natural and Native born, as there is within Jewish law similar precedent and commented that the Court agreed there is a difference and would read the SCOTUS decision Plaintiff provided….Continue Reading
The following related update is from the ObamaReleaseYourRecords blog site:
Chris Strunk said…
I am awaiting the entered order from the NYS AG and with it I will file for reconsideration within ten days for Justice Schmidt to review cure to the procedural matters accordingly.
In the NYS CPLR 3215 (c) as to the matter raised by the court in regards to failure to file a motion for default would be subject to “unless sufficient cause [is] shown why the complaint should not be dismissed.”
Crossing the “sufficient cause” hurdle along with the CPLR 306-b service ordered by the Court with the attached CPLR 307 service upon the state; and as for the referenced “vague” portions of the verified complaint and or the proposed FAC I have within ten days to cure the vagueness after the order of entry is had with a more definite statement with CPLR 3024.
In regards to particularity, CPLR 3016 (b) and the vagueness referenced by the court in re the cause of action for “sediton treason and conspiracy” as not being a civil action, I regard each as part of the proximate cause of injury as part of a scheme to defraud that has a 6 year statutory limit with CPLR 213(8) “an action based upon fraud; the time within which the action must be commenced shall be the greater of six years from the date the cause of action accrued (from collusion in re NBC on or about December 2005) or two years from the time the plaintiff or the person under who plaintiff claims discovered the fraud (DOS FOIA release July 29 2010), or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it.”
The court question as to why a new complaint could not be filed is now under consideration.
However, my motion for reconsideration will include a reworked Amended Complaint as welll as the Amended Summons.
Natural Born Citizen –
Well, well. What do we have here? No long form birth certificate for Obama?
The following is a post from Ulster Man on Facebook:
BIRTHER ALERT!!It would appear the new Gov. of Hawaii is having trouble locating actual birth cert. of a certain someone. Go to the bottom of article. Quote: “You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plans to release more information regarding Pres. Obama’s birth certificate. How is that comin…g?” “…it has a political implication for 2012 that we simply cannot have.” Whoa.
Hawaii’s leading news source for Hawaii news. Honolulu Star-Advertiser provides nonstop breaking news in Honolulu, Hawaii. With expanded photo coverage of Hawaii sports and insightful business news coverage.
Quote from WND:
…For seemingly the first time, Abercrombie frankly acknowledged that presidential politics motivated his search for Obama birth records, implying that failure to resolve the questions that remain unanswered about the president’s birth and early life may damage his chance for re-election….
AND Col. Lakin remains a political prisoner of Obama.
In support of Lt. Col. Lakin’s courage in seeking the ‘Truth’ (and as a former In-Flight Tech in the Navy), I urge all who have served or have friends/family in the military to ask the following question of those currently serving.
Brothers and Sisters in the Military, when are you going to demand Obama establish that he is a Natural Born Citizen, eligible to serve as Commander In Chief?
The military is the only government organization that I continue to have respect for and it pains me criticize those serving. And I understand the consequences of challenging Obama’s eligibility directly, but the continuing attacks against our Constitution by the left cannot be allowed to pass without objection in some form or another. Acquiescence is not the only option.
Consider this please. What if every serviceman or woman went to his or her Chaplin, stated their concerns and provided the basic evidence (direct and circumstantial, links, former statements by NPR etc. indicating a Kenyan birth, etc., etc.) that would cause most reasonable persons to have legitimate questions about Obama’s lack of eligibility to serve and issue lawful orders? What if requests were made to each Chaplin instructing them to pass these concerns up the Chain of Command? Would there come a point, a number of requests that would cause the leadership to demand proof of eligibility?
Maybe military leadership could utilize the following provision?
§ 935. Art. 135. Courts of inquiry
(a) Courts of inquiry to investigate any matter may be convened by any person authorized to convene a general court-martial or by any other person designated by the Secretary concerned for that purpose, whether or not the persons involved have requested such an inquiry.
If the Oath to protect the Constitution is not important today, why don’t we just change the oath of allegiance to reflect our current level of commitment?
I, _______, do solemnly swear to protect ME and I will try to defend the Constitution as long as it doesn’t adversely impact the aforementioned ‘ME’.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Official Disclosure – Just to be clear, my graphics depict almost all members of the BOPAC Administration as being full of crap. They do not actually look like turds – one needs special ‘full of crap’ glasses to be able to see the core of those who continually feed America BS. I treat everyone equally – when Glenn Beck goes off on those who reasonably question Obama’s eligibility, he gets a half-full of crap depiction.