Obama – Gay Cover-Up – Michelle Obama – Larry Sinclair – Censorship – American Mediocrity

The BOPAC Report:

I looks like the latest addition of The Globe is out in some parts of the country!

From Larry Sinclair’s site and also Obambi.com:

Thursday, May 28, 2009

MICHELLE OBAMA :”Thats The Name of The Game, Discredit Larry Sinclair.

Get your copy of the latest issue of Globe Magazine on sale now at a Wal-Mart and Super Market near you for the whole story. Globe Magazine is more accurate in their reporting than the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, etc……

Below are some excerpts from the recent Globe Magazine article concerning Michelle Obama’s campaign to stop the book,

BARACK OBAMA & LARRY SINCLAIR:
Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder?

If Michelle Obama can intimidate book publishing companies with a few phone calls, what will happen when Obama has a like minded individual on the Supreme Court?  I never thought I would see the day when the publishing industry is leading the way to censorship.

Will the internet continue to be a forum for the free expression of opinion?  Maybe not. It seems Judge Sotomayor has little hesitancy in siding with the powerful in their efforts to punish a little girl’s “douche bag” comment on her blog.  Where’s the ACLU?  Will they oppose this nominee?

Sotomayor Ruled in “D-Bag Case” Ruled teen’s blog post created a created “foreseeable risk of substantial disruption”

By YVONNE NAVA and LEANNE GENDREAU

Updated 12:16 PM EDT, Thu, May 28, 2009

President Barack Obama’s nominee to fill a Supreme Court vacancy has yet another tie to Connecticut. She sided against a student in the infamous “douche bag” case, and that has upset some free-speech advocates.

//

In August 2007, Judge Sonia Sotomayor sat on a panel that ruled against an appeal in Doninger v. Niehoff.

Avery Doninger was disqualified from running for school government at Lewis S. Mills High School in Burlington after she posted something on her blog, referring to the superintendent and other officials as “douche bags” because they canceled a battle of the bands she had helped to organize.

The case went to court and in March 2008, Sotomayor was on a panel that heard Doninger’s mother’s appeal alleging her daughter’s free speech and other rights were violated. Her mother wanted to prevent the school from barring her daughter from running.

Sotomayor joined two other judges from the 2nd Circuit in ruling that the student’s off-campus blog remarks created a “foreseeable risk of substantial disruption” at the student’s high school and that the teenager was not entitled to a preliminary injunction reversing a disciplinary action against her, Education Week reports….Continue Reading

Recently, it was reported that mainly Chysler’s car dealerships whose owners donated to Republicans were the ones targeted to close. These actions sound a lot like the work of the mob silencing opponents – silencing political speech.  It seems that  the Obama Administration (with the help of their minions and the media) is continuously making  attacks (direct & indirect) on people who have taken positions opposed to the official narrative or have expressed opinions they want silenced. Larry Sinclair, Stanley Kurtz, Dr. Orly Taitz, Philip Berg, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Carrie Prejean, Justice Clarence Thomas, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, FOX and many others could give first hand experiences with Obama’s efforts to control what the public hears.

A free America… means just this: individual freedom for all, rich or poor, or else this system of government we call democracy is only an expedient to enslave man to the machine and make him like it.
Frank Lloyd Wright

By silencing opinions in opposition, the  masses will likely buy into the rhetoric and gladly put on the yoke of enslavement themselves. Ignorance is bliss, I suppose.  It amazes me that America’s march to enslaving its people by controlling information is being led by publishing companies.

How do they make them like it? Vilify others such as business, Republicans, Conservatives, and those who don’t tow the line – then make these evil “taxpayers” (the vast majority of those paying the bulk of taxes are much fewer in number than voters who receive some type of government handout) support the dependent masses who vote, give voters stimulus checks, hand out temporary government jobs, promise “good” government run health care, grant amnesty to illegals and make voters out of them too, etc.  In other words buy their votes and/or create dependency and help them forget and/or ignore America’s founding principles.  Welcome to the United States of Mediocrity!

Blame others, reward some and create victims.   It works for votes, but it is not sustainable and will bankrupt the country.

Update:  I just saw on Drudge the following headline:

Obama Offers Prime Posts to Those Who Helped Bankroll Campaign...

It fits in perfectly with the blame, reward, and create victims tactics of Chicago Politics. Change my left foot.

Obama – Birth Certificate – Robert Gibbs – FOX News – Larry Sinclair – The Globe – Gay Cover-Up – CitizenWells – Philip Berg – Dr. Orly Taitz

The BOPAC Report:

From Dr. Orly Taitz comes the following:

Obama eligibility on FOX

Finally a little glimmer of hope. Brett Bair reported on the growing buzz on the internet about Obama’s Eligibility! He even posted the forged birth certificate!! Pres secretary Gibbs was asked about it and he said “Obama already posted a copy on the internet.” Reporter said this is not going away!! Thanks every one ( Orly taitz, Rick Biesada, and other talk show folks for their efforts!! Now is the time to elevate e-mails and protests as the door is opening slightly to the media. Most importanly we must not stop we must RAMP IT UP!!!! thanks from Kirk at nobamaforpresident.com

I agree with Dr. Orly. We must RAMP IT UP!

The Steady Drip explains why Mr. Gibbs is blowing smoke…. It is clear that Obama and Gibbs have not provided anything that conclusively establishes that he was born in Hawaii.

Thursday, May 28, 2009
What kinds of birth records does Hawaii provide?
Exactly what kinds of birth records does Hawaii provide?
Posted by Mijgreb on Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:00:00 AM
Generally, folks don’t know that Hawaii law, even in 1961, provided for multiple kinds of birth records, most of which are not what people think of when they think of birth certificates. The following is a description of those, including certificates for people not born in Hawaii. Go figure!

1. In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were three different birth certificates that were obtainable:
a. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
b. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or mid wife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, an adult could, upon testimony, file a “Delayed Certificate”, which required endorsement on the Delayed Certificate of a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing, which evidence must be kept in a special permanent file. The statute provided that the probative value of the Delayed Certificate must be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence. (See Section 57-18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
c. If a child born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult including the subject person) if the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year. (See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
2. In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fourth kind of birth certificate for children born outside of the Territory or State of Hawaii. HRS Chapter 338 was amended to add a new section authorizing the Director of the Department of Health to issue a birth certificate for a person NOT born in Hawaii either as a Territory or State, upon sufficient proof that the legal parents of such individual had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth of such child.
3. The language of the statute clearly applies to births in the days of the Territory of Hawaii, so also births in 1961.
4. A press release concerning numerous questions raised across the country as to whether or not Obama was a natural born citizen was issued on October 31, 2008 by the Hawaii Department of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino.
5. In that very carefully worded press release, Dr. Fukino said that she had “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
6. The intentional ambiguity of that statement raises more questions that it answered.
7. That statement failed to resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation across the country over the issue of Obama’s birth and qualifications for the office of the President of the United States, including:
a. The specific type of certificate was not identified. Could it be the certificate for someone born outside of the State of Hawaii?
b. Being “on record” could mean either that its contents are in the computer database of the department or an actual “vault” original. If the latter, those are the words used to describe what is there. The data base record could have been entered based on a birth record for someone born outside of Hawaii.
c. Therefore, the value as prima facie evidence is limited and easily overcome if any of the allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained and verified with a Court Order.
8. It should also be noted that in the face of all this litigation, the simple presentation of Obama’s vault birth records would put the questions to rest.
9. Obama has not taken this approach to a single one of the cases, but instead has hired legal counsel across the country at no small expense to defend the claims with motions to dismiss on standing and similar procedural grounds.
10. Such response to the request for proof that he is qualified to serve as President of the United States of America only serves to raise more questions about this election.

SEE: http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/05/please-get-this-straight-aka-obama.html

When the media starts reporting on Obama’s probable lack of eligibility to hold the Office of the Presidency, maybe they will investigate Larry Sinclair’s claims that he and Obama engaged in consensual sex while under the influence of cocaine. Mr. Sinclair also found Robert Gibbs’ remarks to be like dancing on the head of a pin while trying to avoid telling the truth.

Thursday, May 28, 2009
WHITE HOUSE PRESS WIND BAG ROBERT GIBBS PLAYS ON WORDS

Robert Gibbs, the White House Press Secretary who has repeatedly made out right false claims about so many things, today in response to a question about Obama birth certificate puts the Obama spin on it yet again.

You will note that Robert Gibbs states, “the State of Hawaii provided, with a seal a certificate of birth….”

What Gibby failed to say along with failing to say the State of Hawaii provide a “BIRTH CERTIFICATE” is that according to the State of Hawaii a “certificate of birth” IS NOT the same as a BIRTH CERTIFICATE nor does it establish place of birth where required for Hawaii State Identification and/or Hawaii state services.

Obama half-sister Maya Ng has a Hawaii Certificate of Birth yet it is a FACT that she was born in her fathers native homeland of Indonesia. Things that make you go hummmmmmm.

I believe The Globe’s next edition will be talking about Larry Sinclair’s allegations.

CitizenWells gives an update on Philip Berg’s efforts to achieve justice before Obama bankrupts America while trampling the Constitution.

Philip J Berg, Update, May 27, 2009, Press release, Third Circuit Court of Appeals Delays Oral Argument, Berg Appeal regarding No Standing Issue
May 27, 2009 · 32 Comments

From Philip J Berg, May 27, 2009:

For Immediate Release: – 05/27/2009

For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]

Fax (610) 834-7659

philjberg@obamacrimes.com
Third Circuit Court of Appeals Delays Oral Argument on
Berg’s Appeal regarding “No Standing” Issue
But Berg is determined to continue his fight to show that
Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to be President because Obama is “not” natural born as required by our U.S. Constitution
obamacrimes.com is the web site for the truth about Obama

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 05/27/2009) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of Constitutional “qualifications/eligibility” to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that he is totally disappointed that the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has delayed “Oral Argument” in the case of Berg vs. Obama, No. 08 – 4340, the case where Judge Surrick denied Berg’s case on the basis that Berg did not have “standing.”…Continue Reading

Obama – Gay Cover-Up – Globe – Larry Sinclair? – CitizenWells – Right Side of Life – Murray v. Geithner – The BOPAC Report

The BOPAC Report:

The Globe continues to do the heavy lifting for the media. The story the media is trying disparately to hide in order to keep the Obama “Fairy Tale” alive.

Michelle Obama’s Fury

FIRST Lady Michelle Obama is spearheading a shocking White House cover-up, insiders say in a blockbuster GLOBE world exclusive. Sources detail the cunning tactics furious Michelle is using to muzzle the man who claims to have had gay sex and cocaine encounters with the President as she battles to protect her husband’s image. It’s must reading for every American!

Five to one the story is about Larry Sinclair!

CitizenWells is reporting some good news today.

Phil at the Right Side of Life reports:
“Murray v. Geithner: Judge Denies Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss RE: AIG, Sharia Law”

“The Thomas More Law Center had originally filed suit in December of 2008 challenging the constitutionality of a portion of the “Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008” (EESA) that appropriated $40 billion in taxpayer money to fund the federal government’s majority ownership interest in AIG, which engages in Shariah-based Islamic religious activities that the Center considers are “anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Jewish.”

They now report that Federal District Court Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff has denied the Defendant’s (Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the Federal Reserve Board) Motion to Dismiss:”

“In his well-written and detailed analysis issued yesterday, Judge Zatkoff denied the request by the Obama administration’s Department of Justice to dismiss the lawsuit. The request was filed on behalf of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the Federal Reserve Board – the named defendants in the case. In his ruling, the judge held that the lawsuit sufficiently alleged a federal constitutional challenge to the use of taxpayer money to fund AIG’s Islamic religious activities.”…Continue Reading

California’s Dysfunctional Family – Obama – Motivations – Birth Certificate – Tenth Amendment – Larry Sinclair – The BOPAC Report

The BOPAC Report:

California’s Dysfunctional Family -

Obama and Congressional Motivations in Bailing Them Out

Arnold Schwarzenegger is in Washington this week (hiding) participating in some mutual back slapping with Obama while his California’s ballot measures are predicted to go down in flames.  Good, if the measures are defeated and good for the apparent reemergence of common sense in California voters! These revenue raising measures have been correctly identified by voters as more of the “Kabuki dance of dysfunctionality.”  Like Michigan, New York, and other reliably blue “progressive” states with high taxes and crippling budget deficits, the problems with their economies rest with legislatures putting the cart carrying the “I wants” ahead of the “revenue” horse.  Hell, most of the legislators in these states are so inept that they fail to recognize what to feed the “revenue” horse so it will produce revenues.

In California, legislators were hoping to cobble together measures that could help close their 42 billion dollar deficit. However, instead of trying to explain in detail how all this came to be, it may be more useful to analogize California’s Governor and Legislature (and other states whose balance sheets are in such a mess) to dysfunctional parents and compare them to parents in “successful” American families.

What are the modeled, learned and acquired attributes present in families that predict success? I think success comes frequently when family members are trying to live ethically, honestly, lovingly, responsibly, determinedly and compassionately. Success comes where family members are trying to think well about each other and trying to be there when one is down and needs a hand up.  Success comes when people are trying to be as self-sufficient as they can by identifying their resources, needs, wants and responsibilities.  I think success comes when family members are prioritizing and focusing on moving forward (as they wish) towards reaching their individual goals; and at the same time, looking out for and taking into consideration the family’s health and economic well being.

What are the attributes of parents that are more likely to lead to a successful family? Parents need to be the adults, thinking about creating opportunities for success for their kids and each other.  Parents need to be role models of responsibility and self-reliance for their children.  They need to be paying attention to each individual family member and the family as a unit.  They need to identify family resources, needs, wants, and responsibilities.  Parents need to model living within one’s means with responsible prioritizing. Parents need to allow children to acquire independence.  They also need to be able to keep strong willed children from running roughshod over the less aggressive family members.  They need to encourage competition and allow failure from time to time. They must say no when necessary.

What has happened in California? Let’s say that the Governor/Legislative bodies are the parents and that the individual legislators, special interest groups and citizens are the children.

I was living in Los Angeles when Arnold was first elected, and at that time he seemed very responsible and determined to set California on a road to fiscal responsibility. It was amazing that it seemed most people were on board and hoping for positive change. Then when spending cuts were proposed – the teachers unions, the media and others threw their money, weight and voices behind blocking everything Arnold was trying to do. The Terminator was effectively castrated by the unions and their friends. Now Governor Schwarzenegger seems to have given up on real fiscal responsibility and has been reduced to a parent negotiating and pleading with strong willed children (legislators beholding to teacher’s unions, environmental groups and other special interests) to be liked and survive.

These groups in California are so strong and selfish that neither the Governor nor the Legislature can do anything that bumps up against their interests or wants without throwing them something.   They stomp their feet and scream that they want THAT toy NOW or scream NO that’s mine. The regular non-governmental citizens/taxpayers are the less aggressive children who are being run over by selfish bullies in the family and being asked to sacrifice (pay taxes) for their greed.  The parents (the Governor and Legislature) are unwilling (afraid) to say no to the bullies or take care of the other less aggressive children. The possibility of not being reelected is clouding the duty of these “parents” to create economic stability.

The parents are certainly aware that they have resources that could go a long way towards getting them through their financial crisis. They could cut taxes on businesses and corporations to try to attract jobs and increase revenue to the state.  They could start the ball rolling on reviving the nuclear power industry, creating good jobs and providing clean energy. California also has lots of oil just off the coast seeping out naturally and the ability to solve a lot of their water problems with simple solutions but their obstinate children continue to stand opposed, tying up projects and solutions that could help the “family.”

So is Governor Schwarzenegger now in Washington just to soak up the applause of the left with his support of much higher national CAFE standards that will hasten the demise of the American auto industry?   Or is Governor Schwarzeneggar there to cement some type of federal bond guarantee/bailout from the Grand Parents – Obama and the Federal Government?  Is he shaking hands with the devil or following a Siren steering America and her Constitution to the rocks? (These new standards will add about 1,300 dollars to the cost of each new American car. America/California needs to be accelerating research to find ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere and use/store it, instead of ways to slow our economy with cap and trade nonsense that will only make a certain few rich beyond measure. China and India are not signing on to forced reductions of CO2; and therefore, we will only accomplish damaging the competitiveness of American businesses and sending American jobs packing. Yesterday, NPR had a piece on reverse migration for India – a brain drain from the U.S.  For most of middle/rural America, all the government incentives Congress can print won’t make it economically feasible for most to pay what these cars are going to cost. When Obama gets his $5.00 a gallon gas price established, it will only serve to drive rural Americans and America’s businesses over the cliff. )

Hasn’t Schwarzenegger seen that with everything Obama has touched so far, there are tentacles attached that are intended to keep control with our incompetent Congress?  Does he really think that Obama is not going to cause some part of California’s sovereignty to slip away?  Will something Governor Schwarzenegger agrees to cause every state’s sovereignty to erode?  Will the Terminator terminate the protection afforded California through the 10^th Amendment for 30 (billion) pieces of silver?

Amendment 10 – Powers of the States and People

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

This “Grandparent” has a closet full of skeletons poised to bust the door down if the media ever starts acting like journalists instead of cheerleaders.  There are numerous lawsuits challenging the eligibility of Obama to hold the Office of President of the United States.  Many in the United States Military and several state legislators have joined these actions as Plaintiffs – but not a word from the media. However, if one judge remembers that his or her oath was not to Obama but was to the Constitution of the United States and the Rule of Law, then Obama’s time in the Oval Office will probably be over soon.  If discovery is allowed to proceed and Obama is forced to produce his long form birth certificate, college records and other requested documents; we all may see exactly why Obama has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees to keep these documents from the public.  The reason is that he may not be a “natural born citizen” as required under the Constitution.  (See Philip Berg, Dr. Orly Taitz, CitizenWells, Mario Apuzzo and the Right Side of Life for information about the eligibility issue.)

Another skeleton that might slide under Obama’s door may be his association(s) with the community group, ACORN.  Regrettably, the only nationally known person acting at all like a real journalist this year and investigating ACORN is the self-described opinion guy, Glenn Beck. Nevertheless, a preliminary indication from what Mr. Beck has reported is that ACORN is looking like a snake pit of corruption.  On cue, it turns out that the New York Times apparently squashed an Obama/ACORN/corruption story prior to the election because it might have looked bad for him.  Imagine that. The media’s manipulation/non-reporting of the news is the main problem facing America today because people cannot tell what the truth is and they don’t have the time or energy to dig for it.  America’s problems can’t be solved effectively if we don’t have all the information.

Even though Rezko, Ayers, Rev. Wright, Alinsky, Odingo, Farrakhan, and Larry Sinclair reflect different verses to Obama’s Song, the media fails to report family secrets. For Governor Schwarzenegger to approach Obama the “grandparent” looking for a handout is like a parent approaching the child-molesting grandparent for help and giving them more access to his family.

Governors across America had better be paying attention when these dysfunctional families/states seek to shift the results (debt) of their lack of fiscal responsibility onto the backs of residents of states that are not sinking and how such efforts could affect our rights under the 10^th Amendment. It is not right – but it will not be a surprise when citizens of responsible states are forced to bear the burden of paying for dysfunctional (blue) states’ drunken spending.  The Obama Administration is not going to let California’s crisis go to waste and miss the opportunity to further consolidate power in their ever growing Federal Government.

“The world is a dangerous place not because of those who do evil but because of those who look on and do nothing” Albert Einstein

I believe Texas Governor Perry should contact Dr. Orly Taitz or Philip Berg and join their efforts seeking enforcement/protection of the United States Constitution and the Rule of Law. With Nancy Pelosi daily undermining the CIA efforts to keep America safe and Obama making huge strides towards creating his “central” government, time is increasingly short.

Update: California measures all failed except the single good one.  Watch for the Governator’s hand reaching for your wallet vis-à-vis Obama!

Obama – Philip Berg Update – Steady Drip – Michael Savage – Rush – Hannity – Beck – Larry Sinclair – The BOPAC Report

The BOPAC Report:

Phil Berg has an update on his site.  The following copy of the update comes from The Steady Drip.

Monday, May 18, 2009

Phil Berg’s Latest News Release – 5/17/09

For Immediate Release: – 05/17/2009
For Further Information Contact:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659

philjberg@obamacrimes.com
Berg states the Obama’s give Commencement Addresses but fail to be honest with the graduates about who they really are.
Barack Obama is really Barry Soetoro, an illegal alien, an Usurper who is Constitutionally “ineligible” to be President of the United States.
Michelle Obama is a “disbarred” attorney in Illinois – how and why ?
Why does the public not know the backgrounds of the phonies in the White House ?
Obama is the biggest “HOAX” against the United States in over 230 years !

Time to e-mail !

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 05/17/2009) -
Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of Constitutional “qualifications/eligibility” to serve as President of the United States and has three [3] cases that are still pending in the Federal Court system, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al, announced today that he is asking everyone to e-mail the messages below to DEMAND THE OBAMA’S to release the “truth” about their backgrounds.

The purpose of our President is to protect our Country, the U.S.A. and “We The People”, not to leave us with doubts and fears. If “We The People” and our Country, the United States of America, are important to Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama, he would do everything in his power to put all doubts and fears to rest. It is a very easy solution; all he has to do is provide his Constitutional eligibility credentials and records. Yes, transparency and openness as promised by Obama !

Our country is in a financial crisis, BUT WORSE, a “Constitutional Crisis” as Obama is not “Constitutionally eligible/qualified” to be President.

Send one [1] e-mail to the following: The White House, Vice President Biden – http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/; Nancy Pelosi – AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov; ASSOCIATED PRESS – traum@ap.org; New York Times – letters@nytimes.com, oped@nytimes.com, editorial@nytimes.com, nytnews@nytimes.com, executive-editor@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com, news-tips@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com, washington@nytimes.com; Washington Post – letters@washpost.com, national@washpost.com, sundaysource@washpost.com; Washington Times – oped@washingtontimes.com, yourletters@washingtontimes.com; Los Angeles Times – Tim.Garrison@latimes.com, Michael.Owen@latimes.com, Tenny.Tatusian@latimes.com, David.Johnson@latimes.com, Marc.Olson@latimes.com, Michael.Muskal@latimes.com, Roger.Smith@latimes.com, Ashley.Dunn@latimes.com, Steve.Padilla@latimes.com, Mark.Barabak@latimes.com, Connie.Stewart@latimes.com, Robin.Abcarian@latimes.com, Bob.Drogin@latimes.com; The Chicago Tribune – tips@tribune.com, bdold@tribune.com, ctc-editor@tribune.com, JHirt@tribune.com, JWinnecke@tribune.com, KAlleynemorris@tribune.com, Rxbecker@tribune.com, SBenzkofer@tribune.com; The Sacramento Bee – oped@sacbee.com, letters@sacbee.com: ATLANTA JOURNAL – CONSTIUTION – bsteiden@ajc.com, cwarmbold@ajc.com, cynthia@ajc.com, gmathis@ajc.com, hklibanoff@ajc.com, hpost@ajc.com, jmallory@ajc.com, jbookman@ajc.com, jdwallace@ajc.com, letters@ajc.com, insideajc@ajc.com, pgast@ajc.com, rnarayanan@ajc.com, rhenry@ajc.com; BOSTON GLOBE – goodman@globe.com, kcooper@globe.com, johnson@globe.com, letter@globe.com, brelis@globe.com, oliphant@globe.com; BUSINESS WEEK – lettersbwol@businessweek.com, richard_dunham@businessweek.com; ABC – netaudr@abc.com, nightline@abcnews.com, 2020@abc.com; CBS – evening@cbsnews.com, earlyshow@cbs.com, 60minutes@cbsnews.com, 48hours@cbsnews.com, ftn@cbsnews.com; NBC – today@nbc.com; FOX News – comments@foxnews.com, Special@foxnews.com, Foxreport@foxnews.com, Oreilly@foxnews.com, Hannity@foxnews.com, Colmes@foxnews.com, Ontherecord@foxnews.com; CNN and CNN Headline News – http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form1.html?6, http://www.cnn.com/feedback/; aaron.brown@turner.com, andrea.koppel@turner.com, bill.schneider@turner.com, bruce.morton@turner.com, candy.crowley@turner.com; MSNBC, dateline@nbc.com, hardball@msnbc.com, joe@msnbc.com, nightly@nbc.com; CNBC – info@cnbc.com; PBS – newshour@pbs.org; NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO – ombudsman@npr.org; THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW – ElRushbo@eibnet.com; SEAN HANNITY SHOW – phil.boyce@citcomm.com;

“To Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Soetoro and Michelle Obama: As your administration is to be “open and transparent,” why will you not divulge your backgrounds? I know why.
As both of you are addressing graduates of college, you are being dishonest to all of them as you fail to tell them about your backgrounds. What a disgrace !

Because both of you are putting on the biggest “HOAX” in our country in over 230 years.
Barack or rather Barry [Soetoro], you know you are an illegal alien, not only “Constitutionally ineligible/unqualified” to be President, but also it was illegal for you to have served as a United States Senator from Illinois for 3 ½ years.

Michelle, just be honest ! You are being honored as First Lady without explaining to the citizens of our country that you were “disbarred” from being an attorney in 1993 – why ? The public has a right to know.

Michelle and Obama, you both know that you are putting forth this great “HOAX,” that is so dangerous to all of us, the people of this great nation.

Reveal yourselves and Obama resign, as President “now” as everything you do is void or voidable. Why are you putting our nation through this turmoil ?

Thank you,
Respectfully,

__________________________ [your name]”

For copies of all Press Releases and Court Pleadings, go to:
obamacrimes.com

Dr. Orly Taitz gives results of a study that seems about right given that in the Obama/Napolitano world – conservative America is suspected of being domestic terrorists.

US is the 6th worst police state in the world

To:

me@glennbeck.com, hannity@foxnews.com, oreilly@foxnews.com, tammyblog@yahoo.com, writemalkin@gmail.com, dr_taitz@yahoo.com, info@actforamerica.org, AdminForWeb@saf.org, goamail@gunowners.org

This would probably be very valuable to report. Would wake a lot of people up and hopefully move the country away from being such a police state. Interesting how the country can be such a police state while simultaneously compromising national security to such an extent as to condone terrorism within its own borders (promoting Sharia Law within the U.S. legal system, permitting terrorist training camps in 35 states, naming American streets after infamous terrorists (Sheik Gulani), funding relocation of terrorist “refugees” from Middle East to live in the U.S. on taxpayer dollars, Gitmo fiasco, waterboarding is “torture” (when it’s a training method on our own troops, etc.).

Please help! Thank you.

Police State Study Ranks U.S. As 6th Worst In The World

UK in 5th, behind only the most ardent dictatorships
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Tuesday, May 12, 2009

A study designed to rank countries in terms of how aggressively they monitor their populations electronically, has placed the US as 6th and the UK as 5th on a global index.

The two countries lag behind only China, North Korea, Belarus and Russia in terms of governmental surveillance.

The report, titled The Electronic Police State, (PDF link) was compiled from information available from different organizations such as the Electronic Privacy Information Center, Reporters Without Borders, Freedom House, the Ludwig von Mises Institute and The Heritage Foundation.

52 countries were rated on 17 criteria with regard to how far down the line they are toward a total electronic police state….Continue Reading

I see that Larry Sinclair, the man who alleges that he and Obama did some drugs and engaged in consensual sex in 1999, is advertising Michael Savage’s book, Psychological Nudity. I like Savage and wish him success in getting his name off Great Britain’s terrorists who are banned from entry list.  Anyone who listens to Savage knows that his inclusion on such a list is rediculous and is an assault on free speech worldwide.  I hope Rusl Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck will give more public support for Michael Savage’s plight. It won’t be long before Pelosi and Obama will be coming after talk radio.

Marriage is the Domain of the Church and God – Obama – Gay Marriage – Glenn Beck – Church – Market Risk – Stock Market – Federal Deficit – Social Security – The BOPAC Report

Marriage is the Domain of the Church and God -

Market Risk is the Domain of Individuals and Business -

Neither is the Domain of the Federal Government.

This morning I heard Glenn Beck talking briefly about gay marriage, civil unions and the possibility that triad couples (between more than 2 people) could soon start demanding the same rights. After I finished rolling my eyes, I began thinking about the issue and quickly came to the same opinion that I hold concerning gay marriages and marriage in general.  Marriage is an issue for the church, consenting adults, and God.  If there are some churches that recognize gay marriages, fine (as long they are between freely consenting adults).  If there are some churches that recognize marriage between more than two people or communal families, fine (as long as they are between freely consenting adults).  I’m not in the religion or morality business as long as actions don’t hurt others or infringe upon their rights.

Why in the world is the government, any government, state or federal, in the business of sanctifying or recognizing any marriage?  It has always been clear to me that when government makes it possible for people who are “married” to have benefits and rights (social security or medical decision making) different from “non-married” people, it is a violation of both the equal protection clause (14^th Amendment to the Constitution) and the prohibition respecting the establishment of religion (1^st Amendment to the Constitution).

Social Security benefits accruing to surviving spouses are probably the main reason people are upset about the federal government not recognizing gay marriage in general.  I agree completely that gay and single couples both have a legitimate right to be upset.  Where does the idea and definition of marriage come from?  It comes from the church. (Particularly churches of the Judea/Christian tradition.)

In this country, the Christian church’s biblical interpretation that marriage is only between one man and one woman is engrained in literature and history as the rule.  However today, there are churches that recognize and perform marriages between couples of the same sex, transgender persons, and even between a man and a woman.  So, when official government process bestows benefits to those individuals who are in “traditional marriages”, the definition of which was establish by the Judea/Christian beliefs, there is clearly a preference being made for one religion’s or church’s definition of marriage over those found in other religions or churches.

When government goes down the “we benefit you, but not you” path; it sure seems like government is either involved in establishing  a particular religion or government is not providing equal protection and opportunity for “single” individuals who wish to consolidate and share their resources as “partners” or “significant others” the same as “traditionally married” people.  Government should either benefit people equally or don’t benefit anyone.

If Joe and Mary, or Joe and Sam, or Joe, Mary, & Jane said to the government that we want to pool our social security contributions from this date forward, then every participant’s individual social security contributions would be pooled and the sum would be divided by the number of people involved and that amount would be credited to each person’s individual social security earnings account.

This would allow the stay-at-home mom or dad to make contributions to their individual social security account as if they were “working” (half of the family’s income would be credited to each person in the relationship).  It would work the same way for gay couples or communal families.  Each person in such an arrangement would have some measure of protection vis-à-vis social security.  There would be no surviving spouse benefit because they would have their own social security. Primary income earners or those with a bigger income could direct part of their social security contributions to another’s account because they are committed to the other person (or people) and/or recognize the value of another person(s) non-monetary contributions such as raising children, gardening or taking care of the house.

I would think that most people would not have a problem with such a restructuring of Social Security because the government would be recognizing the limits of its power by saying we are not going to involve ourselves with the definition of the term marriage.  Marriage is within the domain of the church, the consenting individual(s), and their God.

It amazes me that the government doesn’t try harder to stay out of the business of limiting the rights of individuals more.  It seems like politicians want division so they can play each side off the other and maintain their grip on power.  Every time the government and politicians get involved in anything they create fear and uncertainty; and then use that uncertainty to their own advantage.  One only needs to look at the current financial mess that the economy is in.

Obama likes to say that he inherited the mess and he is only doing what has to be done.  However, the truth is that he and many Democrats in Congress share a great deal of the blame for the economic mess and Obama is using this crisis to get his political objectives accomplished.  The entire mess can be traced back to when government (mostly Democrats, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd) decided it wanted to get into the business of setting up regulations that created opportunities for groups like ACORN to pressure banks into lending to people who were not able to afford mortgages. This led to many of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s problems; which coupled with packaging these sub-prime assets into financial bundles and selling them round the world; it caused the global house of cards to collapse.

The government was trying to manipulate business RISK principles and it backfired.  Banks wound up being in the position of making risky loans that could be sold to the government (or guaranteed) and the bank’s RISK of losing its own money was greatly diminished.  It’s a lot easier to play fast and loose with other people’s money.

Market Risk is the Domain of Individuals and Business.

Now, people are getting excited that the stock market appears to be signaling the end of the crisis.  Think again.  The news of the past few days paints a much bleaker picture.  Consider the following:

With passage of Obama’s budget, the government will have to borrow almost 50 cents for every dollar it spends this year.

The Federal deficit will be greater than 1.8 trillion dollars this year.

Social Security and Medicare financial projections have been revised to reflect that they are going broke sooner than expected.  Medicare is already losing money by the truckloads and Social Security will be sending out payments faster than money coming in by 2016. That’s only 7 years away! Congress is not only spending money like drunken sailors but they are also so afraid of risking the votes of senior citizens that they are unwilling to effectively address the Social Security/Medicare problem.  (That’s the problem with creating dependency for voter loyalty, the bill always comes due. Then it comes down to who can be blamed.  With the American media’s proclivity for supporting Democrats, blame usually finds it way to Republicans regardless of facts to the contrary.)

Last week, the Treasury auction went poorly and Treasury yields soared.  This means that the government has to pay much more interest on the amounts they are borrowing.

This week, the government was buying their own securities to bring the yields back down some.  Where are the funds coming from to for the Fed to do all this buying? They have the printing presses running overtime.  This will, in the not too distant future, damage severely the value of the dollar and cause a substantial rise in inflation.  The price of everything will go up and foreign countries will be reluctant to purchase our debt to keep the charade going.

China, who holds a great deal of our debt, will be looking for treasuries paying higher interest in order to entice them to purchase more debt.

The more the government prints money out of thin air, the more the dollar’s value will be affected.  There will more money available to buy the same number of goods – causing inflationary pressure. Demand will likely take a downturn once consumers figure out they need to be protecting bank balances.  However, with a decline in dollar’s value, it means that many goods will cost more to produce because the materials required for production will cost more. Therefore producers will either need to raise prices, lower profit margins, lower labor costs (lower wages and/or cut jobs), and/or relocate to areas where the costs of production (taxes etc.) are lower.  However, even with these actions, consumers may not buy at higher prices (or even current prices) and businesses will go under.

So why are stock going up? I believe that many people are being led to think the crisis is ending by Obama and the media and they want to be in on the bull market.  I also believe that many people are moving out of U.S. Securities because the yields are relatively low right now, some stocks price/earnings ratios look attractive comparatively and some investors are starting to believe that Treasuries are too risky and could collapse in the future.  I think people are buying stocks because they feel like they are buying something tangible like buildings, machinery, etc. I bet buyers are looking at companies that don’t have high debt to equity ratios.  Stocks just look better than most of the other choices right now.  Now is the operative word because once interest rates on government securities are forced to rise to 6 or 7%, a lot of investors will shift back trying to stay ahead of the calamity that’s nearly certain to come.  This amount of debt and planned taxation is not sustainable.

This crisis can only be overcome by returning to sound economic principles now. Congress and Obama must stop trying to spend and tax our way out of this. The media needs to be telling the story of how to work toward healthy long term economic fundamentals and not just promoting Obama’s plan.  Obama’s massive stimulus is a short-term feel good illusion; but like social security, the bill will come due.

The media should encouraging Tea Parties instead of attacking them.  The media needs to tell the truth about Obama and his real objectives.  The media needs to investigate & report factually about Obama’s eligibility issue, Rezko, Ayers, Larry Sinclair’s allegations, Obama’s associations with ACORN, and the numerous other issues and scandals from Obama’s past. Before America can come together, these questions must be addressed fully. The media generated Obama “fairy tale” must stop because America’s future is at stake. The media needs to tell the truth and report the news.

We need to support companies like Ford who are not feeding off tax payers and taking direction from self-serving politicians.  Boycott companies like GM, Chrysler, Citigroup and others who undermine ingenuity and lead America to mediocrity.

Neither marriage nor market risk should be within the domain of the Federal Government.

Notre Dame Seniors Boycott Obama – Boycott GM and Chyrsler – BUY FORD – CitizenWells – Norman Mattoon Thomas – Larry Sinclair – The BOPAC Report

The BOPAC Report:

This is the kind of Community Organizing that Obama should be proud of but probably will not even notice (like he didn’t notice the Tea Parties).  I hope all of the graduating class of Notre Dame boycotts Obama’s attendance.

Some Notre Dame Seniors Say No to Graduation

Because of President Obama’s appearance and speech at Notre Dame this Sunday, some seniors will not attend their own graduation ceremony and instead join a University prayer service on the grounds at Notre Dame. No indication yet as to how many seniors will forgo the graduation ceremony.

The student group behind this effort, ND Response, has made this wild hollywood style video showcasing their displeasure with Notre Dame and the President. I must say the production value is extremely high and I feel like I’m watching a trailor for some sort of hollywood blockbuster movie. Watch it here.

Continue Reading

Maybe these Notre Dame Seniors will organize a boycott of GM and Chrysler for their unseemly acquiescence to Obama’s marching America to socialism.  BUY Ford!

CitizenWells has an excellent post up that says it all!

Norman Mattoon Thomas

Leading American socialist

Six time Socialist Party of America presidential candidate

Norman Thomas, 1962

From a 1944 Norman Thomas speech:

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism.

But, under the name of “liberalism”,

they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program,

until one day America will be a socialist nation,

without knowing how it happened.”

“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party.

The Democratic Party has adopted our platform.”

A  Comment on Larry Sinclair’s Site gives a small glimmer of hope that the Media’s Baby-Pooh Yellow Wall of Silence is showing a few cracks.  Time will tell.  The Comment is in response to Larry’s post-

I AM CALM IN THE WAKE OF THE OBAMA INTERNET THUG ATTACKS BECAUSE I KNOW THEY WILL BE EXPOSED -

Anonymous said… I think your going to win it Larry. My neighbor’s daughter came to visit for Mother’s Day and we had a surprising talk. Turns out she is a senior in journalism at Missouri, and is interning at a major midwest newspaper. Believe it or not, she has been secretly interviewing people from…Continue Reading

Obama – National Press Club – Geraldo Rivera – Dr. Orly Taitz – Larry Sinclair – The BOPAC Report

The BOPAC Report:

Last night by chance, I had the opportunity watch a little of Geraldo Rivera’s show, Geraldo At Large.  One of the segments was about John Edwards’ affair and Elizabeth Edwards’ new book “Resilience.”  As part of the discussion, Geraldo explained that the National Enquirer broke the John Edwards story long before the main stream media started covering it and that they (the National Enquirer) were usually “right” about such things.  Panelist, John Fund, jumped in and indicated that the media should have been pursuing the story all along.

I agree with both assertions.  The National Enquirer usually does get the celebrity/politician fooling around stories right and the main stream media should have covered the story much earlier.   But as we all know, the main stream media will only cover the politician caught with their pants down story quickly if the rascal is a Republican, conservative or it’s so blatant that they can’t ignore it.

Case in point, last year Larry Sinclair came forth with allegations that he and Obama had used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex a couple of times in 1999 and the media did everything they could do to keep from investigating or reporting on the story.  The media was (is) so protective of their guy, Obama, that they wouldn’t even try to disprove the story by attempting to establish that then Sen. Obama was not in Chicago or available to Mr. Sinclair during the week in question.  So far, neither the version of events nor the time line as alleged by Larry Sinclair have been refuted by any credible means.

As far as I know, the media that broke this story first was Globe Magazine. Globe is part of American Media, Inc., which also owns The National Enquirer and as Geraldo indicated, they usually get these kind of stories right.

To date, Larry Sinclair has not shown any sign of giving up his effort to get his story out to the American public.  He has withstood countless attacks by Obama supporters and has even been arrested; yet, he keeps coming. Fortunately, Mr. Sinclair has written a book about his story and it should be out soon.  Mr. Sinclair’s book should stand in stark contrast to the Obama “fairy tale” put out by the media.

I do have a suggestion for Mr. Sinclair.  On May 21^st at the National Press Club, Elizabeth Edwards will be discussing her new book “Resilience.”   Maybe Larry Sinclair should attend, compare notes about his resilience and exchange books.  Hopefully this time, Mr. Sinclair will not be arrested.

Time: 6:30 PM  Event Type: NPC Book Event  Sponsored by: Book & Author Committee  Event Location: Ballroom  Details:

Elizabeth Edwards Discusses Her New Book “Resilience”
Thursday, May 21 at 6:30 PM
Bestselling author Elizabeth Edwards shares her inspirational message on the challenges and blessings of coping with adversity in her newest book Resilience on Thursday, May 21 at 6:30 PM. She will be welcomed by National Press Club President, Donna Leinwand.

On the surface, Elizabeth Edwards seems to have led a charmed life with a beautiful family, thriving career, supportive friendships and a loving marriage. But she’s no stranger to adversity. Many know of the strength she has shown after her son, Wade, was killed in a freak accident when he was only sixteen years old. She would exhibit this remarkable grace and courage again when the very private matter of her husband’s infidelity became public fodder. And, her own life has been on the line. Days before the 2004 presidential election — when her husband, John, was running for vice president — she was diagnosed with breast cancer. After rounds of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation the cancer went away — only to reoccur in 2007 in an incurable form. A short, powerful, inspirational book, Resilience will resonate with anyone dealing with difficulties in their life, who seeks to find peace in knowing they are not alone, and the promise that things can get better.

1. This event is open to the press and the public free of charge, however, space is limited and reservations are required. RSVP at opus@press.org. Resilience will be available for purchase ($23.00) and signing by Mrs. Edwards at the event. As a fundraiser for the Eric Friedheim National Journalism Library, outside books are not permitted.

Contact: Nicole Nottingham
(202) 662-7523
opus@press.org

The National Press Club might also offer Dr. Orly Taitz an opportunity that could help her courageous efforts to protect the Constitution.

The Commandant if the United States Marine Corps will be appearing at a luncheon at the National Press Club on June 11^th.  Maybe the General can explain why he has not looked into the allegations that Obama is not a “natural born citizen” and is therefore ineligible to serve as President/Commander in Chief.   With over 50 lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility, it seems that the General would surely be aware of the issue and would want to make sure that he and his troops are in fact following “lawful orders.”  If Obama is not eligible, how can he issue any lawful orders?

Time: 12:30 PM  Event Type: NPC Luncheon  Sponsored by: Speakers Committee  Event Location: Ballroom  Details:

General James Conway, Commandant, U.S. Marine Corps will address a Luncheon on June 11.

For copies of this luncheon event, please contact the NPC Archives -
Phone: 202-662-7598
E-mail: archives@press.org

Submit a Question

A Wink and Nod to Torture – Spain – Obama – Misdirection – Transnationalism – The BOPAC Report

The BOPAC Report:

A Wink & Nod to Torture –

Will Spain Genuflect to Obama’s Misdirection?

Recently, I wrote an article concerning the Democratic left’s (Obama & Harold Koh) misguided infatuation with transnationalism, its undermining of American sovereignty and how transnationalism vis-à-vis unforeseen international actions/prejudices could jeopardize Obama’s precarious hold on the Presidency.   I basically warned Mr. Obama that he should be careful what he wished for because he might just get it. Now, the transnational view from the Oval Office reveals more thunder clouds gathering several hundred miles behind the Azores in Spain.

In the Obama Transnational Irony, I recounted…a news article that indicated that “Criminal proceedings have begun in Spain against six senior officials in the Bush administration for the use of torture against detainees in Guantánamo Bay. “  The action appears to be based in part on the fact that the United States is a signatory to the 1984 UN Convention against Torture that requires states to investigate allegations of torture committed on their territory or by their nationals, or extradite them to stand trial elsewhere.  The argument goes that because these six officials were giving critical advice to President Bush, without which “it would have been impossible to structure a legal framework that supported what happened [in Guantánamo]“, they can be held criminally liable.

If Spain does issue arrest warrants for Alberto Gonzales, David Addington, Douglas Feith, William Haynes, John Yoo or Jay Bybee and subsequently seeks extradition, Obama is going to be put in a fairly difficult position.

…If Obama orders or causes a real criminal investigation of these individuals or extradition, surely he will be opening himself up to Dr. Orly Taitz’s eligibility dragon raising its head and talons coming to the aid of these defendants.  Dr. Orly Taitz is one of a number of attorneys across the country who have brought over 50 lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States….

If Obama is in fact not eligible to serve, he cannot legally order extradition and his appointment of Mr. Holder would also be invalid. To date no judge has allowed an evidentiary hearing on the merits of the basic allegation that Obama is not a “natural born citizen” under the Constitution.  However, given that the rights of the criminally accused to be heard, confront their accusers and to due process are paramount in American Jurisprudence that might have to change.

A day or two after writing the Obama Transnational Irony, it began to look like Obama had managed, either through luck or some sort of backroom wheeling and dealing, to avoid the possibility that his probable lack of eligibility to serve as President of the United States would be raised as a defense in a criminal proceeding.  The Attorney General of Spain was recommending that matter be dropped.

However, this week it appears that Spain is continuing on its crusade against anything – anywhere that has even a hint of coerciveness to it, regardless of the views of their Attorney General.  It seems Spain might be suffering from some sort of internalized guilt from their history during the Spanish Inquisition and under Francisco Franco’s rule; and now, they’re assuming the role of Don Quixote de la Mancha.  In my opinion, Don Quixote had a much better grasp of reality and dangers faced in the world than the modern day Spanish judges, who appear only to pander to public opinion of ostridges.   One Spanish judge has recently made a procedurally required inquiry to U.S. authorities seeking to find out if their targets were currently the subjects of judicial inquiry.  A different Spanish judge has started another probe into torture allegations at Gitmo and a third is asking to interrogate eight Chinese officials concerning deaths and/or disappearance of hundreds/thousands of Tibetans.   (I’m only going to address the torture aspect involving Americans.)

Earlier, I had suggested a few options available to Mr. Obama to try to avoid Spain’s pesky transnational interference with the limits of what advisors to the President should be allowed to proffer.  Obama’s Administration has added a clever twist one of these.

…He will need to either start a criminal investigation here in the United States or deal with an extradition request from Spain.   It might be possible for him, with a wink and a nod, to start an investigation and conclude the accused were simply giving advice that every President needs to govern and end it; or he might start an investigation and drag it out until he’s out of office.  I believe the wink and nod would have to be there for Obama to pull that off….

Obama has been in the uncomfortable position of having to placate his mostly irrational Democratic left, trying to keep some level of CIA intelligence coming in from those who do the interrogating, and trying to show Spain that he is handling the matter (providing political cover) so they will drop their investigations.

First, Obama tried to float the let’s just move on argument that it would serve no purpose to pursue criminally members of the Bush Administration. We want to look forward and not back. That blew a fuse with the far left. Moveon.org said move back and think again.

Then, in less than 24 hours, Obama came out and said that the CIA interrogators would not be pursued if they acted within the four corners of the interrogation documents.  But as for others in the Bush Administration, he would leave it up to Holder.  This sent a chill through the CIA and increases the likelihood that we will not be able to discover as many terrorist plots because we now have a gun shy CIA.  (In the Art of War, Sun Tzu expresses his deep awareness that foreknowledge is a critical factor for success in war and that foreknowledge cannot be elicited from spirits.  It comes from people.)

…Those in intelligence are “gong to become increasingly wary about doing dangerous things,” Lowenthal said. “They feel at the end of the day they won’t be covered. It’s not irreparable right now, but it’s problematic.”…

Now, Obama is allowing the release of many more troubling photographs and refusing to provide any memos/documentation showing how successful these interrogation techniques have been.  In fact, these interrogation techniques have provided critical information that prevented a 9/11 type attack in Los Angeles and another planned attack against the Brooklyn Bridge saving many lives.

Of course, Obama has given several speeches condemning torture, apologizing to the world, saying that Churchill never condoned “torture.”  However, he was totally mistaken.

And finally, we find out that Mr. Holder is not likely to prosecute these former Bush officials, but may try to get several of these individuals (Yoo & Bybee of California) disciplined by their respective Bar Associations.  Disbarment is in fact a very fairly sever punishment for an attorney or Judge.  Lucky for Mr. Gonzales, he is from Texas and Texans seem to use more “common sense” when balancing interrogation and preventing the possible deaths of thousands, if not millions, of Americans.  (This Justice Department inquiry may be released in the coming weeks.)

All of these self-serving actions put America’s security and her troops in greater danger by telegraphing to our enemies just how far we will go (allowing enemies to prepare against our interrogation attempts) and by casting a disparaging light on our military and CIA personnel (undermining moral and resolve). Obama epitomizes the President who looks at the issues of interrogation, “torture”, and war through the lens of one beholding to the people who got him elected.   To appease his supporters and cover his liabilities, Obama seems willing to do whatever he can as quickly as possible.

However, the group most culpable for endangering America’s security is the American media.  Their Bush hating war reporting during the last eight years has emboldened our enemies and caused a concurrent lack of resolve in the American people. The media’s gushing support for and failure to vet candidate Obama brought to power the most divisive and extreme person ever to sit in the Oval Office.  (Rezko, Ayers, Socialism, Larry Sinclair, ACORN, campaign funding issues and lack of “natural born citizen” status should have derailed Obama’s candidacy early on.)

Will America’s enemies respond positively to Obama’s apologies and showings of weakness?  I doubt it and the damage can’t be undone easily.

Will this last step of hoping bar discipline to allow Obama to once again sidestep answering the allegations that he is not a “natural born citizen”- and is therefore ineligible to hold the Office of the Presidency?  Maybe so, since Holder vis-à-vis Obama would not be involved. (Passing the buck to protect the golden goose?)

Will the self-righteous left be placated?  Seems unlikely to me.

However, the bigger question is – Will Spain be placated by this result and submissively genuflect to Obama because he’s basically one of them, a transnationalist, who has gotten himself into a pickle with this whole birth certificate/eligibility mess? It depends if Spanish judges, looking at Obama’s wink and nod of political cover, believe it is sufficient for them.

It’s probably appropriate to share my opinion/bias about war and interrogation.

I am strongly opposed to torture.

But-

With the exception of water-boarding being used only when “ABSOLUTELY” necessary, the interrogation techniques that were described in the memos that Obama released do not constitute “torture during war” if the individuals subjected were legitimately believed to have actionable intelligence that could prevent loss of life at the hands of terrorists and the methods were carefully monitored.  I realize that this is a broad harsh statement and arguments are always present concerning who is defining who a “terrorist” is, what a “legitimate belief” is, what “careful monitoring” is, and what our ethics are.

Interrogations are not pleasant and they certainly should bother everyone involved – the interrogator and the people interrogators are trying to protect.  Harsh interrogation must never become common place; but it must be recognized that under certain circumstances, circumstances where lives are at stake, we must have interrogators who can do what we and they hate.  (I do believe that if an interrogator truly enjoys the rough stuff, they need find some other way to serve.)

Rough techniques, much rougher than those described in the memos, have been used by almost all countries when lives are at stake.  I certainly believe that Obama would try to get CIA interrogators to utilize every technique if people he loved were in imminent danger.  However, considering the recent political actions of Obama regarding interrogation techniques and possible prosecutions, it is possible that interrogators would refuse out of fear Obama would send the Justice Department after them at some later date.

Interrogations are not nice and wars are horrific.  Wars are horrific so as to be avoided if at all possible. However, sometimes both are unavoidable.  It would be great if Obama could get information from terrorists with foot rubs and Jacuzzis; and fight wars with paint balls.  However, when fighting a determined adversary, the only thing such thinking will accomplish is defeat, loss of liberty and even greater loss of life.  We don’t live in a politically correct world and we can’t fight wars that are politically correct on one side and hope to remain free or even survive in the face of the Sharia world as envisioned by people such as the President of Iran.

There is a differentiation between the ethics we have when survival is at stake and those when we are at peace. There are basic survival instincts that shape and compromise our abilities to hold high and ideal ethics. There are also desperate situations that call upon individuals to bend society’s ethics for the moment, regretfully, but resolutely. If your children are hungry or seriously ill, the ethics of taking a loaf of bread that you can’t pay for pales in comparison.  Ethics are struggle. They are not black or white – in life or war.  (Unless you’re a politician or in the main stream media, then your ethics can seemingly go as far as you can get away with.) What would you parents do to keep your daughter from being forced to wear a burka? What would you parents do to keep your son from be forced to change his religion to suit Sharia law? What would you parents do to keep your children alive? Would you say to the interrogator please do what you need to do to stop this – I thank and forgive you?  The interrogators hopefully understand that your children are in jeopardy, that their lives, freedoms and futures are at stake.  Hopefully, with your forgiveness, their own, and their God’s – they will make it though the days remaining to them.

I do realize that there are some who genuinely believe that it is better to perish rather than lift a hand in anger or self defense, and they live that way. Are they walking unattached in this world, unattached to this world, unattached to country, unattached even unto themselves? Christ like? I don’t know. However, it seems that such a position takes a lot of courage and awareness.  I suspect their numbers are very few; and that for most who profess such belief, it is more or less a notion that has not been put to the test. Regarding the far, far left, it seems me that they are mainly dominated by self-righteous, intolerant, arrogant, America bashing elitists. One thing that’s for certain, America can’t count on them to protect our friends, family, freedoms or Constitution.

My thanks go to the United States Military and militaries of our allies.

Unless a person is one of the very few as described above, the following quote sums up my feelings on defense of family, freedom, America and her Constitution:

A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
John Stuart Mill

My fear is that one day many may come to believe that under Obama’s ideology and control, America has ceased to be something that is worth fighting for.  If the people who Janet Napolitano believes could be domestic terrorists won’t fight for America, who will? Barney Frank? Chris Dodd? Nancy Pelosi? Harry Reid? Chris Matthews? Katie Couric? ACORN? The extreme left? The Media? George Soros?

We are not there yet, but our rights and freedoms are being quickly eroded by the Obama Administration and Congress.  We need to organize and vote out people who are not fiscally responsible, vote out people who do not adhere to the Constitution, and vote out people who are more concerned with their own power than the people’s power.  We need to boycott companies like GM, Chrysler, Citigroup and others who are acting as parasites clinging to the nation’s teat.  We need to buy from companies like Ford who reject government control of business.

If America ever does become something, whose ideals and values are not worth fighting for, the only advice I can give is to sell your stock in Anheuser-Busch, iron your burkas and grow your beards because life is a changing – for the WORSE!

Obama – CitizenWells – Larry Sinclair – Looking Behind The Curtain

The BOPAC Report:

Today CitizenWells has an excellent post up about Larry Sinclair and how Mr. Sinclair caused many, myself included, to begin to look behind the curtain of the “Obama Fairy Tale.”  What one finds in Obama’s life is mostly – Vilification, Manipulation and Distraction.

From CitizenWells:

“Barack Obama and Larry Sinclair Cocaine, Sex, Lies and Murder”

Larry Sinclair book

Larry Sinclair story

I wrote the following about 6 months ago:

“The Larry Sinclair story was the catalyst for me and many others to begin questioning
the character and background of Barack Obama, a candidate that most of us knew little about.
Mr. Sinclair’s allegations appeared preposterous at first but captured my curiousity.
I began by examining the Official Illinois State Senate records for the period of November 3 – 8,
1999. I discovered that Obama was missing on November 4, 1999. I thought, “interesting.”
I then read the transcripts from the Tim Russert, Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun-Times.
All three interviews regarded asking Obama about his records during his tenure in the Illinois
Senate. Obama was consistently vague and evasive in his answers. This piqued my curiousity more.
One thing led to another and within a few days I knew that we had a problem with Obama. I had reached
the point of no return and could not in good conscience abandon my efforts. I continued to follow
the Larry Sinclair story and watched it play out in detail. I got to know Larry and we achieved
a level of mutual trust that soon became a precious commodity.

The Larry Sinclair story evolved into at least four large separate stories:
1. The initial encounter with Obama in 1999.
2. The Donald Young controversy.
3. The attacks made on Larry Sinclair, those following his story and anyone questioning
the “messiah” Obama.
4. The changing and withholding of internet information and attempts to prevent Larry Sinclair
and others from reporting the truth.

I have come to know Larry Sinclair as a person and not just a story. I admire Larry for his persistence in the face of incredible odds, his integrity and his patriotism.

Citizen Wells”
I would like to add the following:

How many of you would be willing to go to jail and risk your life for your country and your beliefs?
How many of you would persist against forces out to destroy you and your reputation, forces with unlimited resources and forces that ultimately gained the power of the US Presidency?
How many of you would have refused to make money off of enormous web site traffic despite the fact that you were fighting a battle with limited resources

Larry Sinclair has done so….Continue Reading